| Message ID | 6d867f8f-c7b9-42e9-1764-6f802d6b1e96@huawei.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:37:10AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > > > On 2016/11/17 22:22, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 03:32:26PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > >> There is a common SMP boot message in generic code on all arches, > >> kill "SMP: Total of %d processors activated." in smp_cpus_done() > >> on arm64. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> > >> --- > >> Boot message on qemu. > >> [ 0.375116] smp: Brought up 1 node, 8 CPUs > >> [ 0.383749] SMP: Total of 8 processors activated. > >> > >> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 1 - > >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c > >> index cb87234..9db4a95 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c > >> @@ -428,7 +428,6 @@ static void __init hyp_mode_check(void) > >> > >> void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus) > >> { > >> - pr_info("SMP: Total of %d processors activated.\n", num_online_cpus()); > >> setup_cpu_features(); > >> hyp_mode_check(); > >> apply_alternatives_all(); > > > > Why? Are you proposing the same change to other architectures? Are you paid > > per patch? > > The message provides no further information than the generic code, so kill it. > Or show BogoMIPS like arm32? Ha! No, I don't think printing the BogoMIPS is the right solution. I just think that, if you insist on removing the harmless print, then you should also consider doing the same thing for all the other architectures that print the same message. Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:18:26AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:37:10AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > > The message provides no further information than the generic code, so kill it. > > Or show BogoMIPS like arm32? > > Ha! No, I don't think printing the BogoMIPS is the right solution. I just > think that, if you insist on removing the harmless print, then you should > also consider doing the same thing for all the other architectures that > print the same message. Note that I'd removed the redundant message from ARM a long time ago, until Linus reverted the patch due to the /proc/cpuinfo part. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c index cb87234..6bb33cd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c @@ -428,7 +428,17 @@ static void __init hyp_mode_check(void) void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus) { - pr_info("SMP: Total of %d processors activated.\n", num_online_cpus()); + int cpu; + unsigned long bogosum = 0; + + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) + bogosum += loops_per_jiffy; + + pr_info("SMP: Total of %d processors activated " + "(%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS).\n", + num_online_cpus(), + bogosum / (500000/HZ), + (bogosum / (5000/HZ)) % 100); setup_cpu_features(); hyp_mode_check(); apply_alternatives_all()