| Message ID | 20170419091326.11226-3-linus.walleij@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | None | expand |
On Wed 19 Apr 02:13 PDT 2017, Linus Walleij wrote: > The RPM clocks were missing for MSM8660/APQ8060. For this to be > completed we need to add a special fixed rate RPM clock that is used > for the PLL4 on these SoCs. The rest of the clocks are pretty > similar to the other supported platforms. > > The "active" clock pattern is mirrored in all the clocks. I guess > that the PLL4 that clocks the LPASS is actually never used as > "active only" since the low-power audio subsystem should be left > on when the system suspends, so it can be used as a stand-alone > MP3 player type of device. > > As we do not have firmware for the LPASS we will probably only use > this clock when the system is up and running (not suspended) for now, > so that will be using the "active" clock. > Note that "active" vs "sleep" is not related to the Linux suspend state, but rather the CPU idle state; at the bottom of the CPU idle path the RPM will react and reconfigure resources to their sleep state (if one is configured) and then reconfigured based on the active state before returning from the idle. The PLL4 seems to be enabled only on behalf of the booting LPASS Hexagon - which will cast its own vote once its booted - and as such we only configure the active state (meaning both states will have same configuration). The result is that PLL4 will be on from prepare() to unprepare() regardless of what the application CPU does. > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > ChangeLog v1->v2: > - Add the small hunk to the clk_rpm_handoff() function that just > skip over this for the fixed PLL4 clock. This accidentally > ended up in another patch. > --- > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c > index df3e5fe8442a..61c67e93bea3 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c > @@ -56,6 +56,30 @@ > }, \ > } > > +#define DEFINE_CLK_RPM_FIXED(_platform, _name, _active, r_id, r) \ Is there a reason why you don't use DEFINE_CLK_RPM_PXO_BRANCH() for PLL4? Looking at the downstream code PLL4 is explicitly handled differently and is only exposing one state. So if you're seeing issues with reusing the PXO_BRANCH() I think you should slim this down further and only register a single clk_rpm from this. > + static struct clk_rpm _platform##_##_name = { \ > + .rpm_clk_id = (r_id), \ > + .rate = (r), \ > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ \ > + .ops = &clk_rpm_fixed_ops, \ > + .name = #_name, \ > + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "pxo_board" }, \ > + .num_parents = 1, \ > + }, \ > + }; \ > + static struct clk_rpm _platform##_##_active = { \ > + .rpm_clk_id = (r_id), \ > + .peer = &_platform##_##_name, \ > + .active_only = true, \ > + .rate = (r), \ > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ \ > + .ops = &clk_rpm_fixed_ops, \ > + .name = #_active, \ > + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "pxo_board" }, \ > + .num_parents = 1, \ > + }, \ > + } > + [..] > @@ -348,6 +412,46 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_rpm_branch_ops = { > .recalc_rate = clk_rpm_recalc_rate, > }; > > +/* MSM8660/APQ8060 */ > +DEFINE_CLK_RPM_FIXED(msm8660, pll4_clk, pll4_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_PLL_4, 540672000); My OCD wants this at the bottom of the list... > +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, afab_clk, afab_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_APPS_FABRIC_CLK); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, sfab_clk, sfab_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_SYS_FABRIC_CLK); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, mmfab_clk, mmfab_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_MM_FABRIC_CLK); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, daytona_clk, daytona_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_DAYTONA_FABRIC_CLK); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, sfpb_clk, sfpb_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_SFPB_CLK); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, cfpb_clk, cfpb_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_CFPB_CLK); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, mmfpb_clk, mmfpb_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_MMFPB_CLK); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, smi_clk, smi_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_SMI_CLK); > +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, ebi1_clk, ebi1_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_EBI1_CLK); Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 04/19, Linus Walleij wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c > index df3e5fe8442a..61c67e93bea3 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c > @@ -56,6 +56,30 @@ > }, \ > } > > +#define DEFINE_CLK_RPM_FIXED(_platform, _name, _active, r_id, r) \ > + static struct clk_rpm _platform##_##_name = { \ > + .rpm_clk_id = (r_id), \ > + .rate = (r), \ > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ \ > + .ops = &clk_rpm_fixed_ops, \ > + .name = #_name, \ > + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "pxo_board" }, \ Parent should be pxo, not pxo_board. > + .num_parents = 1, \ > + }, \ > + }; \ > + static struct clk_rpm _platform##_##_active = { \ > + .rpm_clk_id = (r_id), \ > + .peer = &_platform##_##_name, \ > + .active_only = true, \ > + .rate = (r), \ > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ \ > + .ops = &clk_rpm_fixed_ops, \ > + .name = #_active, \ > + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "pxo_board" }, \ ditto. > + .num_parents = 1, \ > + }, \ > + } > + > #define DEFINE_CLK_RPM_PXO_BRANCH(_platform, _name, _active, r_id, r) \ > static struct clk_rpm _platform##_##_active; \ > static struct clk_rpm _platform##_##_name = { \ > @@ -143,6 +167,13 @@ static int clk_rpm_handoff(struct clk_rpm *r) > int ret; > u32 value = INT_MAX; > > + /* > + * The vendor tree simply reads the status for this > + * RPM clock. > + */ > + if (r->rpm_clk_id == QCOM_RPM_PLL_4) > + return 0; > + I can't recall what that was all about. Handoff code came later than when this PLL was supported, so perhaps we just missed handoff here. Really it probably doesn't matter because sounds aren't being played in the bootloader and/or the PLL isn't enabled that early. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 05/27, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Wed 19 Apr 02:13 PDT 2017, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > The RPM clocks were missing for MSM8660/APQ8060. For this to be > > completed we need to add a special fixed rate RPM clock that is used > > for the PLL4 on these SoCs. The rest of the clocks are pretty > > similar to the other supported platforms. > > > > The "active" clock pattern is mirrored in all the clocks. I guess > > that the PLL4 that clocks the LPASS is actually never used as > > "active only" since the low-power audio subsystem should be left > > on when the system suspends, so it can be used as a stand-alone > > MP3 player type of device. > > > > As we do not have firmware for the LPASS we will probably only use > > this clock when the system is up and running (not suspended) for now, > > so that will be using the "active" clock. > > > > Note that "active" vs "sleep" is not related to the Linux suspend state, > but rather the CPU idle state; at the bottom of the CPU idle path the > RPM will react and reconfigure resources to their sleep state (if one is > configured) and then reconfigured based on the active state before > returning from the idle. > > The PLL4 seems to be enabled only on behalf of the booting LPASS Hexagon > - which will cast its own vote once its booted - and as such we only > configure the active state (meaning both states will have same > configuration). The result is that PLL4 will be on from prepare() to > unprepare() regardless of what the application CPU does. > > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > --- > > ChangeLog v1->v2: > > - Add the small hunk to the clk_rpm_handoff() function that just > > skip over this for the fixed PLL4 clock. This accidentally > > ended up in another patch. > > --- > > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c > > index df3e5fe8442a..61c67e93bea3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c > > @@ -56,6 +56,30 @@ > > }, \ > > } > > > > +#define DEFINE_CLK_RPM_FIXED(_platform, _name, _active, r_id, r) \ > > Is there a reason why you don't use DEFINE_CLK_RPM_PXO_BRANCH() for > PLL4? > > Looking at the downstream code PLL4 is explicitly handled differently > and is only exposing one state. So if you're seeing issues with reusing > the PXO_BRANCH() I think you should slim this down further and only > register a single clk_rpm from this. True. Except we would need a slight variant on PXO_BRANCH, because PXO_BRANCH would be better if it returned the parent rate from recalc_rate(), by just not having a recalc rate op set. The parent is pxo_board/cxo_board and that will have the correct rate for the board we're running on. In the PLL4 case, we want to return the magic frequency that we know the PLL is running at because that was the only configuration supported. So we would need a special recalc op for that one clk here. But otherwise yes it should be able to use most of the other code. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed 19 Apr 02:13 PDT 2017, Linus Walleij wrote: >> The "active" clock pattern is mirrored in all the clocks. I guess >> that the PLL4 that clocks the LPASS is actually never used as >> "active only" since the low-power audio subsystem should be left >> on when the system suspends, so it can be used as a stand-alone >> MP3 player type of device. >> >> As we do not have firmware for the LPASS we will probably only use >> this clock when the system is up and running (not suspended) for now, >> so that will be using the "active" clock. >> > > Note that "active" vs "sleep" is not related to the Linux suspend state, > but rather the CPU idle state; at the bottom of the CPU idle path the > RPM will react and reconfigure resources to their sleep state (if one is > configured) and then reconfigured based on the active state before > returning from the idle. > > The PLL4 seems to be enabled only on behalf of the booting LPASS Hexagon > - which will cast its own vote once its booted - and as such we only > configure the active state (meaning both states will have same > configuration). The result is that PLL4 will be on from prepare() to > unprepare() regardless of what the application CPU does. OK I copy/pasted some of this into my commit message and cut the "active" clock from PLL4. >> +#define DEFINE_CLK_RPM_FIXED(_platform, _name, _active, r_id, r) \ > > Is there a reason why you don't use DEFINE_CLK_RPM_PXO_BRANCH() for > PLL4? So it is (I think as concluded from the other mail) a pretty hardwired PLL that can only be turned on and off. #define DEFINE_CLK_RPM_PXO_BRANCH(_platform, _name, _active, r_id, r) This macro presupposes an _active variant, so it's not really working :/ Nothing in the driver is using this macro however, it seems like it was defined for some missing piece. How do you feel about if I simply update that macro and cut the _active version then? Or should I create a new DEFINE_CLK_RPM_PXO_BRANCH_FIXED()? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c index df3e5fe8442a..61c67e93bea3 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c @@ -56,6 +56,30 @@ }, \ } +#define DEFINE_CLK_RPM_FIXED(_platform, _name, _active, r_id, r) \ + static struct clk_rpm _platform##_##_name = { \ + .rpm_clk_id = (r_id), \ + .rate = (r), \ + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ \ + .ops = &clk_rpm_fixed_ops, \ + .name = #_name, \ + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "pxo_board" }, \ + .num_parents = 1, \ + }, \ + }; \ + static struct clk_rpm _platform##_##_active = { \ + .rpm_clk_id = (r_id), \ + .peer = &_platform##_##_name, \ + .active_only = true, \ + .rate = (r), \ + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ \ + .ops = &clk_rpm_fixed_ops, \ + .name = #_active, \ + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "pxo_board" }, \ + .num_parents = 1, \ + }, \ + } + #define DEFINE_CLK_RPM_PXO_BRANCH(_platform, _name, _active, r_id, r) \ static struct clk_rpm _platform##_##_active; \ static struct clk_rpm _platform##_##_name = { \ @@ -143,6 +167,13 @@ static int clk_rpm_handoff(struct clk_rpm *r) int ret; u32 value = INT_MAX; + /* + * The vendor tree simply reads the status for this + * RPM clock. + */ + if (r->rpm_clk_id == QCOM_RPM_PLL_4) + return 0; + ret = qcom_rpm_write(r->rpm, QCOM_RPM_ACTIVE_STATE, r->rpm_clk_id, &value, 1); if (ret) @@ -269,6 +300,32 @@ static void clk_rpm_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw) mutex_unlock(&rpm_clk_lock); } +static int clk_rpm_fixed_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct clk_rpm *r = to_clk_rpm(hw); + u32 value = 1; + int ret; + + ret = qcom_rpm_write(r->rpm, QCOM_RPM_ACTIVE_STATE, + r->rpm_clk_id, &value, 1); + if (!ret) + r->enabled = true; + + return ret; +} + +static void clk_rpm_fixed_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct clk_rpm *r = to_clk_rpm(hw); + u32 value = 0; + int ret; + + ret = qcom_rpm_write(r->rpm, QCOM_RPM_ACTIVE_STATE, + r->rpm_clk_id, &value, 1); + if (!ret) + r->enabled = false; +} + static int clk_rpm_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate) { @@ -333,6 +390,13 @@ static unsigned long clk_rpm_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, return r->rate; } +static const struct clk_ops clk_rpm_fixed_ops = { + .prepare = clk_rpm_fixed_prepare, + .unprepare = clk_rpm_fixed_unprepare, + .round_rate = clk_rpm_round_rate, + .recalc_rate = clk_rpm_recalc_rate, +}; + static const struct clk_ops clk_rpm_ops = { .prepare = clk_rpm_prepare, .unprepare = clk_rpm_unprepare, @@ -348,6 +412,46 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_rpm_branch_ops = { .recalc_rate = clk_rpm_recalc_rate, }; +/* MSM8660/APQ8060 */ +DEFINE_CLK_RPM_FIXED(msm8660, pll4_clk, pll4_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_PLL_4, 540672000); +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, afab_clk, afab_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_APPS_FABRIC_CLK); +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, sfab_clk, sfab_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_SYS_FABRIC_CLK); +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, mmfab_clk, mmfab_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_MM_FABRIC_CLK); +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, daytona_clk, daytona_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_DAYTONA_FABRIC_CLK); +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, sfpb_clk, sfpb_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_SFPB_CLK); +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, cfpb_clk, cfpb_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_CFPB_CLK); +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, mmfpb_clk, mmfpb_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_MMFPB_CLK); +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, smi_clk, smi_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_SMI_CLK); +DEFINE_CLK_RPM(msm8660, ebi1_clk, ebi1_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_EBI1_CLK); + +static struct clk_rpm *msm8660_clks[] = { + [RPM_PLL4_CLK] = &msm8660_pll4_clk, + [RPM_PLL4_A_CLK] = &msm8660_pll4_a_clk, + [RPM_APPS_FABRIC_CLK] = &msm8660_afab_clk, + [RPM_APPS_FABRIC_A_CLK] = &msm8660_afab_a_clk, + [RPM_SYS_FABRIC_CLK] = &msm8660_sfab_clk, + [RPM_SYS_FABRIC_A_CLK] = &msm8660_sfab_a_clk, + [RPM_MM_FABRIC_CLK] = &msm8660_mmfab_clk, + [RPM_MM_FABRIC_A_CLK] = &msm8660_mmfab_a_clk, + [RPM_DAYTONA_FABRIC_CLK] = &msm8660_daytona_clk, + [RPM_DAYTONA_FABRIC_A_CLK] = &msm8660_daytona_a_clk, + [RPM_SFPB_CLK] = &msm8660_sfpb_clk, + [RPM_SFPB_A_CLK] = &msm8660_sfpb_a_clk, + [RPM_CFPB_CLK] = &msm8660_cfpb_clk, + [RPM_CFPB_A_CLK] = &msm8660_cfpb_a_clk, + [RPM_MMFPB_CLK] = &msm8660_mmfpb_clk, + [RPM_MMFPB_A_CLK] = &msm8660_mmfpb_a_clk, + [RPM_SMI_CLK] = &msm8660_smi_clk, + [RPM_SMI_A_CLK] = &msm8660_smi_a_clk, + [RPM_EBI1_CLK] = &msm8660_ebi1_clk, + [RPM_EBI1_A_CLK] = &msm8660_ebi1_a_clk, +}; + +static const struct rpm_clk_desc rpm_clk_msm8660 = { + .clks = msm8660_clks, + .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8660_clks), +}; + /* apq8064 */ DEFINE_CLK_RPM(apq8064, afab_clk, afab_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_APPS_FABRIC_CLK); DEFINE_CLK_RPM(apq8064, cfpb_clk, cfpb_a_clk, QCOM_RPM_CFPB_CLK); @@ -386,6 +490,8 @@ static const struct rpm_clk_desc rpm_clk_apq8064 = { }; static const struct of_device_id rpm_clk_match_table[] = { + { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8660", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8660 }, + { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-apq8060", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8660 }, { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-apq8064", .data = &rpm_clk_apq8064 }, { } };
The RPM clocks were missing for MSM8660/APQ8060. For this to be completed we need to add a special fixed rate RPM clock that is used for the PLL4 on these SoCs. The rest of the clocks are pretty similar to the other supported platforms. The "active" clock pattern is mirrored in all the clocks. I guess that the PLL4 that clocks the LPASS is actually never used as "active only" since the low-power audio subsystem should be left on when the system suspends, so it can be used as a stand-alone MP3 player type of device. As we do not have firmware for the LPASS we will probably only use this clock when the system is up and running (not suspended) for now, so that will be using the "active" clock. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> --- ChangeLog v1->v2: - Add the small hunk to the clk_rpm_handoff() function that just skip over this for the fixed PLL4 clock. This accidentally ended up in another patch. --- drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+) -- 2.9.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html