| Message ID | b3a976f9a497296a3cecd524931f1e8ea048489f.1526944475.git.denys@ti.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Package upgrades | expand |
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:17 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote: > From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com> > > Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com> > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb > index a0e1cf7..97a3e0c 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb > @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ inherit autotools pkgconfig update-alternatives > DEPENDS = "zlib lzo e2fsprogs util-linux" > RDEPENDS_mtd-utils-tests += "bash" > > -PV = "2.0.1+${SRCPV}" > +PV = "2.0.2+${SRCPV}" > > -SRCREV = "9c6173559f95e939e66efb2ec3193d6f3618cf69" > +SRCREV = "bc63d36e39f389c8c17f6a8e9db47f2acc884659" > SRC_URI = "git://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git \ > file://add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch \ Hi Denys, I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and is still marked as pending. Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember? Just curious... Cheers Andrea [1] Denys Dmytriyenko 2009-03-17 http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/log/recipes/mtd/mtd-utils/add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch > " > -- > 2.7.4 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> wrote: > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and > is still marked as pending. > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember? Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it: commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26 Author: Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com> Date: Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000 Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline option to -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and mtd-utils-native, respectively. Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a BitKeeper clone to mine... Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and > > is still marked as pending. > > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember? > > Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it: > > commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26 > Author: Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com> > Date: Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000 > > Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline option to > -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and mtd-utils-native, > respectively. > > Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a > BitKeeper clone to mine... So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged? -- Denys -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used in image generation anywhere) would be good. Ross On 20 June 2018 at 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >> On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and >> > is still marked as pending. >> > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember? >> >> Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it: >> >> commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26 >> Author: Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com> >> Date: Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000 >> >> Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline option to >> -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and mtd-utils-native, >> respectively. >> >> Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a >> BitKeeper clone to mine... > > So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged? > > -- > Denys -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8? With current master I'm seeing: super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the last format character [-Werror=format-truncation=] On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33 PM Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote: > Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a > follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used > in image generation anywhere) would be good. > > Ross > > On 20 June 2018 at 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote: > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > >> On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and > >> > is still marked as pending. > >> > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you > remember? > >> > >> Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it: > >> > >> commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26 > >> Author: Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com> > >> Date: Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000 > >> > >> Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline > option to > >> -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and mtd-utils-native, > >> respectively. > >> > >> Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a > >> BitKeeper clone to mine... > > > > So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged? > > > > -- > > Denys > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > <div dir="ltr">Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8?<div><br></div><div>With current master I'm seeing:</div><div>super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the last format character [-Werror=format-truncation=]<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33 PM Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a<br> follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used<br> in image generation anywhere) would be good.<br> <br> Ross<br> <br> On 20 June 2018 at 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko <<a href="mailto:denis@denix.org" target="_blank">denis@denix.org</a>> wrote:<br> > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:<br> >> On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <<a href="mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com" target="_blank">andrea.adami@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> >> > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and<br> >> > is still marked as pending.<br> >> > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you remember?<br> >><br> >> Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it:<br> >><br> >> commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26<br> >> Author: Chris Larson <<a href="mailto:clarson@kergoth.com" target="_blank">clarson@kergoth.com</a>><br> >> Date: Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000<br> >><br> >> Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline option to<br> >> -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and mtd-utils-native,<br> >> respectively.<br> >><br> >> Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a<br> >> BitKeeper clone to mine...<br> ><br> > So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged?<br> ><br> > --<br> > Denys<br> -- <br> _______________________________________________<br> Openembedded-core mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" target="_blank">Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core</a><br> </blockquote></div> -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Master builds fine for me, but interestingly I don't see that in my mtd-utils unpack. Do you have patches? Ross On 21 June 2018 at 12:10, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote: > Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8? > > With current master I'm seeing: > super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the last > format character [-Werror=format-truncation=] > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33 PM Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote: >> >> Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a >> follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used >> in image generation anywhere) would be good. >> >> Ross >> >> On 20 June 2018 at 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >> >> On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and >> >> > is still marked as pending. >> >> > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you >> >> > remember? >> >> >> >> Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it: >> >> >> >> commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26 >> >> Author: Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com> >> >> Date: Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000 >> >> >> >> Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline >> >> option to >> >> -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and >> >> mtd-utils-native, >> >> respectively. >> >> >> >> Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a >> >> BitKeeper clone to mine... >> > >> > So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged? >> > >> > -- >> > Denys >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
It might be DEBUG_BUILD enabled in my builds, let me check. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:20 PM Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote: > Master builds fine for me, but interestingly I don't see that in my > mtd-utils unpack. Do you have patches? > > Ross > > On 21 June 2018 at 12:10, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote: > > Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8? > > > > With current master I'm seeing: > > super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the > last > > format character [-Werror=format-truncation=] > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33 PM Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a > >> follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used > >> in image generation anywhere) would be good. > >> > >> Ross > >> > >> On 20 June 2018 at 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote: > >> > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > >> >> On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] > and > >> >> > is still marked as pending. > >> >> > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you > >> >> > remember? > >> >> > >> >> Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it: > >> >> > >> >> commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26 > >> >> Author: Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com> > >> >> Date: Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000 > >> >> > >> >> Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i > cmdline > >> >> option to > >> >> -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and > >> >> mtd-utils-native, > >> >> respectively. > >> >> > >> >> Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a > >> >> BitKeeper clone to mine... > >> > > >> > So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged? > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Denys > >> -- > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Openembedded-core mailing list > >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > <div dir="ltr">It might be DEBUG_BUILD enabled in my builds, let me check.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:20 PM Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Master builds fine for me, but interestingly I don't see that in my<br> mtd-utils unpack. Do you have patches?<br> <br> Ross<br> <br> On 21 June 2018 at 12:10, Martin Jansa <<a href="mailto:martin.jansa@gmail.com" target="_blank">martin.jansa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> > Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8?<br> ><br> > With current master I'm seeing:<br> > super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the last<br> > format character [-Werror=format-truncation=]<br> ><br> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33 PM Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br> >><br> >> Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a<br> >> follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used<br> >> in image generation anywhere) would be good.<br> >><br> >> Ross<br> >><br> >> On 20 June 2018 at 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko <<a href="mailto:denis@denix.org" target="_blank">denis@denix.org</a>> wrote:<br> >> > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:<br> >> >> On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <<a href="mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com" target="_blank">andrea.adami@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> >> >> > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and<br> >> >> > is still marked as pending.<br> >> >> > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you<br> >> >> > remember?<br> >> >><br> >> >> Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it:<br> >> >><br> >> >> commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26<br> >> >> Author: Chris Larson <<a href="mailto:clarson@kergoth.com" target="_blank">clarson@kergoth.com</a>><br> >> >> Date: Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000<br> >> >><br> >> >> Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline<br> >> >> option to<br> >> >> -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and<br> >> >> mtd-utils-native,<br> >> >> respectively.<br> >> >><br> >> >> Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a<br> >> >> BitKeeper clone to mine...<br> >> ><br> >> > So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged?<br> >> ><br> >> > --<br> >> > Denys<br> >> --<br> >> _______________________________________________<br> >> Openembedded-core mailing list<br> >> <a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" target="_blank">Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a><br> >> <a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core</a><br> </blockquote></div> -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
I'm sorry, it's one of those days where "mtd-utils" and "mdadm" look exactly the same to me - yeah both are in oe-core, both start with m and are related to block devices. And the build failure with mdadm is reproducible with DEBUG_BUILD, -O2 and above work fine thanks to -ftree-vrp (similarly like systemd gcc8 issue fixed in http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=b0fdaedc6e9c233f357022b0fb706cb19757f5c4 ) On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:30 PM Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote: > It might be DEBUG_BUILD enabled in my builds, let me check. > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:20 PM Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> > wrote: > >> Master builds fine for me, but interestingly I don't see that in my >> mtd-utils unpack. Do you have patches? >> >> Ross >> >> On 21 June 2018 at 12:10, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8? >> > >> > With current master I'm seeing: >> > super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the >> last >> > format character [-Werror=format-truncation=] >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33 PM Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a >> >> follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used >> >> in image generation anywhere) would be good. >> >> >> >> Ross >> >> >> >> On 20 June 2018 at 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >> >> >> On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] >> and >> >> >> > is still marked as pending. >> >> >> > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you >> >> >> > remember? >> >> >> >> >> >> Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it: >> >> >> >> >> >> commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26 >> >> >> Author: Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com> >> >> >> Date: Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000 >> >> >> >> >> >> Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i >> cmdline >> >> >> option to >> >> >> -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and >> >> >> mtd-utils-native, >> >> >> respectively. >> >> >> >> >> >> Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a >> >> >> BitKeeper clone to mine... >> >> > >> >> > So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged? >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Denys >> >> -- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> > <div dir="ltr">I'm sorry, it's one of those days where "mtd-utils" and "mdadm" look exactly the same to me - yeah both are in oe-core, both start with m and are related to block devices.<div><br></div><div>And the build failure with mdadm is reproducible with DEBUG_BUILD, -O2 and above work fine thanks to -ftree-vrp (similarly like systemd gcc8 issue fixed in <a href="http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=b0fdaedc6e9c233f357022b0fb706cb19757f5c4">http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=b0fdaedc6e9c233f357022b0fb706cb19757f5c4</a> )</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:30 PM Martin Jansa <<a href="mailto:martin.jansa@gmail.com">martin.jansa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">It might be DEBUG_BUILD enabled in my builds, let me check.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:20 PM Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Master builds fine for me, but interestingly I don't see that in my<br> mtd-utils unpack. Do you have patches?<br> <br> Ross<br> <br> On 21 June 2018 at 12:10, Martin Jansa <<a href="mailto:martin.jansa@gmail.com" target="_blank">martin.jansa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> > Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8?<br> ><br> > With current master I'm seeing:<br> > super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the last<br> > format character [-Werror=format-truncation=]<br> ><br> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33 PM Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br> >><br> >> Sorry, no it doesn't. I've just picked this in ross/mut but a<br> >> follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used<br> >> in image generation anywhere) would be good.<br> >><br> >> Ross<br> >><br> >> On 20 June 2018 at 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko <<a href="mailto:denis@denix.org" target="_blank">denis@denix.org</a>> wrote:<br> >> > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:<br> >> >> On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <<a href="mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com" target="_blank">andrea.adami@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> >> >> > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009 [1] and<br> >> >> > is still marked as pending.<br> >> >> > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you<br> >> >> > remember?<br> >> >><br> >> >> Make that at least 2004. This commit in oe-classic touches it:<br> >> >><br> >> >> commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26<br> >> >> Author: Chris Larson <<a href="mailto:clarson@kergoth.com" target="_blank">clarson@kergoth.com</a>><br> >> >> Date: Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000<br> >> >><br> >> >> Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline<br> >> >> option to<br> >> >> -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and<br> >> >> mtd-utils-native,<br> >> >> respectively.<br> >> >><br> >> >> Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a<br> >> >> BitKeeper clone to mine...<br> >> ><br> >> > So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged?<br> >> ><br> >> > --<br> >> > Denys<br> >> --<br> >> _______________________________________________<br> >> Openembedded-core mailing list<br> >> <a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" target="_blank">Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a><br> >> <a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core</a><br> </blockquote></div> </blockquote></div> -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb index a0e1cf7..97a3e0c 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ inherit autotools pkgconfig update-alternatives DEPENDS = "zlib lzo e2fsprogs util-linux" RDEPENDS_mtd-utils-tests += "bash" -PV = "2.0.1+${SRCPV}" +PV = "2.0.2+${SRCPV}" -SRCREV = "9c6173559f95e939e66efb2ec3193d6f3618cf69" +SRCREV = "bc63d36e39f389c8c17f6a8e9db47f2acc884659" SRC_URI = "git://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git \ file://add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch \ "