diff mbox series

glibc: Do not use thumb1 ISA on armv6

Message ID 20181012202823.4003-1-raj.khem@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series glibc: Do not use thumb1 ISA on armv6 | expand

Commit Message

Khem Raj Oct. 12, 2018, 8:28 p.m. UTC 
This does not work and is unsupported so lets compile glibc in ARM mode
always on armv6 SOCs

Fixes [YOCTO #12929]

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

---
 meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

-- 
2.19.1

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Comments

Andre McCurdy Oct. 12, 2018, 8:56 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> This does not work and is unsupported so lets compile glibc in ARM mode

> always on armv6 SOCs


Note the comments in glibc-collateral.inc:

  # This needs to match with glibc.inc, otherwise glibc-scripts and glibc-locale
  # will fail to find main glibc, for details see
  # http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-January/100679.html
  ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm"
  ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv5 = "arm"

Either the two recipes need to be kept in sync or the comment no longer applies?

> Fixes [YOCTO #12929]

>

> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

> ---

>  meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc | 1 +

>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

>

> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc

> index ddf0c6b80e..99c92ce46e 100644

> --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc

> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc

> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"

>  # http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-January/100679.html

>  ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm"

>  ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv5 = "arm"

> +ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv6 = "arm"

>

>  # glibc uses PARALLELMFLAGS variable to pass parallel build info so transfer

>  # PARALLEL_MAKE into PARALLELMFLAGS and empty out PARALLEL_MAKE

> --

> 2.19.1

>

> --

> _______________________________________________

> Openembedded-core mailing list

> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org

> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Khem Raj Oct. 12, 2018, 9:13 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:56 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

> > This does not work and is unsupported so lets compile glibc in ARM mode

> > always on armv6 SOCs

>

> Note the comments in glibc-collateral.inc:

>

>   # This needs to match with glibc.inc, otherwise glibc-scripts and glibc-locale

>   # will fail to find main glibc, for details see

>   # http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-January/100679.html

>   ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm"

>   ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv5 = "arm"

>

> Either the two recipes need to be kept in sync or the comment no longer applies?


I think we can delete comment in a followup

>

> > Fixes [YOCTO #12929]

> >

> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

> > ---

> >  meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc | 1 +

> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

> >

> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc

> > index ddf0c6b80e..99c92ce46e 100644

> > --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc

> > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc

> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"

> >  # http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-January/100679.html

> >  ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm"

> >  ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv5 = "arm"

> > +ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv6 = "arm"

> >

> >  # glibc uses PARALLELMFLAGS variable to pass parallel build info so transfer

> >  # PARALLEL_MAKE into PARALLELMFLAGS and empty out PARALLEL_MAKE

> > --

> > 2.19.1

> >

> > --

> > _______________________________________________

> > Openembedded-core mailing list

> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org

> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Richard Purdie Oct. 12, 2018, 9:42 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 14:13 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:56 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>

> wrote:

> > 

> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

> > wrote:

> > > This does not work and is unsupported so lets compile glibc in

> > > ARM mode

> > > always on armv6 SOCs

> > 

> > Note the comments in glibc-collateral.inc:

> > 

> >   # This needs to match with glibc.inc, otherwise glibc-scripts and

> > glibc-locale

> >   # will fail to find main glibc, for details see

> >   # 

> > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-January/100679.html

> >   ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm"

> >   ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv5 = "arm"

> > 

> > Either the two recipes need to be kept in sync or the comment no

> > longer applies?

> 

> I think we can delete comment in a followup


Looking at the link I'd have said that issue still applies?

Cheers,

Richard

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Khem Raj Oct. 12, 2018, 9:47 p.m. UTC | #4 
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:42 PM Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>

> On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 14:13 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:

> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:56 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

> > > wrote:

> > > > This does not work and is unsupported so lets compile glibc in

> > > > ARM mode

> > > > always on armv6 SOCs

> > >

> > > Note the comments in glibc-collateral.inc:

> > >

> > >   # This needs to match with glibc.inc, otherwise glibc-scripts and

> > > glibc-locale

> > >   # will fail to find main glibc, for details see

> > >   #

> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-January/100679.html

> > >   ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm"

> > >   ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv5 = "arm"

> > >

> > > Either the two recipes need to be kept in sync or the comment no

> > > longer applies?

> >

> > I think we can delete comment in a followup

>

> Looking at the link I'd have said that issue still applies?

>


I am not 100% sure, thats why I wanted
to check and come back with followup
if update was needed.

> Cheers,

>

> Richard

>

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Andre McCurdy Oct. 12, 2018, 10:10 p.m. UTC | #5 
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:42 PM Richard Purdie

> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

>>

>> On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 14:13 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:

>> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:56 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>

>> > wrote:

>> > >

>> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

>> > > wrote:

>> > > > This does not work and is unsupported so lets compile glibc in

>> > > > ARM mode

>> > > > always on armv6 SOCs

>> > >

>> > > Note the comments in glibc-collateral.inc:

>> > >

>> > >   # This needs to match with glibc.inc, otherwise glibc-scripts and

>> > > glibc-locale

>> > >   # will fail to find main glibc, for details see

>> > >   #

>> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-January/100679.html

>> > >   ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm"

>> > >   ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv5 = "arm"

>> > >

>> > > Either the two recipes need to be kept in sync or the comment no

>> > > longer applies?

>> >

>> > I think we can delete comment in a followup

>>

>> Looking at the link I'd have said that issue still applies?

>>

>

> I am not 100% sure, thats why I wanted

> to check and come back with followup

> if update was needed.


If you're not sure then it's better to respect the comment and keep
the two recipes in sync.
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc
index ddf0c6b80e..99c92ce46e 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc.inc
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@  INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
 # http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-January/100679.html
 ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm"
 ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv5 = "arm"
+ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv6 = "arm"
 
 # glibc uses PARALLELMFLAGS variable to pass parallel build info so transfer
 # PARALLEL_MAKE into PARALLELMFLAGS and empty out PARALLEL_MAKE