diff mbox series

[2/2] gpio: tegra: Convert to gpio_irq_chip

Message ID 20201127140852.123192-3-thierry.reding@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series gpio: tegra: Convert to gpio_irq_chip | expand

Commit Message

Thierry Reding Nov. 27, 2020, 2:08 p.m. UTC
From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

Convert the Tegra GPIO driver to use the gpio_irq_chip infrastructure.
This allows a bit of boiler plate to be removed and while at it enables
support for hierarchical domains, which is useful to support PMC wake
events on Tegra210 and earlier.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c | 218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 146 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

Comments

Bartosz Golaszewski Dec. 1, 2020, 3:08 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 3:09 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

>

> Convert the Tegra GPIO driver to use the gpio_irq_chip infrastructure.

> This allows a bit of boiler plate to be removed and while at it enables

> support for hierarchical domains, which is useful to support PMC wake

> events on Tegra210 and earlier.

>

> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

> ---


This looks good to me but Linus is much better versed in hierarchical
domains so I'll let him take a look before picking it up.

Bartosz
Linus Walleij Dec. 5, 2020, 9:33 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 3:09 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

>

> Convert the Tegra GPIO driver to use the gpio_irq_chip infrastructure.

> This allows a bit of boiler plate to be removed and while at it enables

> support for hierarchical domains, which is useful to support PMC wake

> events on Tegra210 and earlier.

>

> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>


The patch didn't apply to my "devel" branch for some reason
so have a look at that, seems gpio-tegra.c has some changes not
in my tree.

>  struct tegra_gpio_soc_config {

> @@ -93,12 +91,12 @@ struct tegra_gpio_soc_config {

>  struct tegra_gpio_info {

>         struct device                           *dev;

>         void __iomem                            *regs;

> -       struct irq_domain                       *irq_domain;

>         struct tegra_gpio_bank                  *bank_info;

>         const struct tegra_gpio_soc_config      *soc;

>         struct gpio_chip                        gc;

>         struct irq_chip                         ic;

>         u32                                     bank_count;

> +       unsigned int                            *irqs;


So this is hierarchical with several IRQs.

>  static int tegra_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)

>  {

>         unsigned int gpio = d->hwirq, port = GPIO_PORT(gpio), lvl_type;

> -       struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);

> -       struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = bank->tgi;

> +       struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);

> +       struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);

> +       struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank;

>         unsigned long flags;

> -       u32 val;

>         int ret;

> +       u32 val;

> +

> +       bank = &tgi->bank_info[GPIO_BANK(d->hwirq)];


So the general idea is to look up the bank from the IRQ offset.

But...

> -       return 0;

> +       if (d->parent_data)

> +               ret = irq_chip_set_type_parent(d, type);

> +

> +       return ret;


I don't quite get this. This makes sense if there is one parent IRQ
per interrupt, but if one of the users of a GPIO in a bank sets the
IRQ type to edge and then another one comes in and set another
of the lines to level and then the function comes here, what type
gets set on the parent? Whichever comes last?

Normally with banked GPIOs collecting several lines in a cascaded
fashion, the GPIO out of the bank toward the GIC is level triggered.

I don't understand how this GPIO controller can be hierarchical,
it looks cascaded by the definition of the document
Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Thierry Reding Dec. 18, 2020, 2:49 p.m. UTC | #3
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 10:33:24PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 3:09 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:

> 

> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

> >

> > Convert the Tegra GPIO driver to use the gpio_irq_chip infrastructure.

> > This allows a bit of boiler plate to be removed and while at it enables

> > support for hierarchical domains, which is useful to support PMC wake

> > events on Tegra210 and earlier.

> >

> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

> 

> The patch didn't apply to my "devel" branch for some reason

> so have a look at that, seems gpio-tegra.c has some changes not

> in my tree.

> 

> >  struct tegra_gpio_soc_config {

> > @@ -93,12 +91,12 @@ struct tegra_gpio_soc_config {

> >  struct tegra_gpio_info {

> >         struct device                           *dev;

> >         void __iomem                            *regs;

> > -       struct irq_domain                       *irq_domain;

> >         struct tegra_gpio_bank                  *bank_info;

> >         const struct tegra_gpio_soc_config      *soc;

> >         struct gpio_chip                        gc;

> >         struct irq_chip                         ic;

> >         u32                                     bank_count;

> > +       unsigned int                            *irqs;

> 

> So this is hierarchical with several IRQs.

> 

> >  static int tegra_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)

> >  {

> >         unsigned int gpio = d->hwirq, port = GPIO_PORT(gpio), lvl_type;

> > -       struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);

> > -       struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = bank->tgi;

> > +       struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);

> > +       struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);

> > +       struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank;

> >         unsigned long flags;

> > -       u32 val;

> >         int ret;

> > +       u32 val;

> > +

> > +       bank = &tgi->bank_info[GPIO_BANK(d->hwirq)];

> 

> So the general idea is to look up the bank from the IRQ offset.

> 

> But...

> 

> > -       return 0;

> > +       if (d->parent_data)

> > +               ret = irq_chip_set_type_parent(d, type);

> > +

> > +       return ret;

> 

> I don't quite get this. This makes sense if there is one parent IRQ

> per interrupt, but if one of the users of a GPIO in a bank sets the

> IRQ type to edge and then another one comes in and set another

> of the lines to level and then the function comes here, what type

> gets set on the parent? Whichever comes last?

> 

> Normally with banked GPIOs collecting several lines in a cascaded

> fashion, the GPIO out of the bank toward the GIC is level triggered.

> 

> I don't understand how this GPIO controller can be hierarchical,

> it looks cascaded by the definition of the document

> Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst


This is basically the same implementation that we've used in the
gpio-tegra186 driver. The goal here is to support wake events, which are
a mechanism for the PMC (which, among other things control wakeup of the
CPU complex from sleep). Wake events are a somewhat non-trivial concept
and I keep second-guessing this myself everytime I look at it...

So basically with these wake events we have a selected number of GPIOs
that are routed to the PMC and which can wake the system from sleep. To
make this work, the PMC IRQ domain becomes the parent of the GPIO IRQ
domain, so what we're forwarding the ->set_type() and ->set_wake()
operations to here is the PMC parent, rather than the parent IRQs which
are, I suppose, somewhat unfortunately named for this particular use-
case.

I suppose given the definition in the documentation the GPIO controller
is both hierarchical (it's a child of the PMC IRQ domain) and cascaded
(sets of GPIOs routed to a number of "parent" interrupts).

What usually helps me in understanding this better is to look at GPIO
and IRQ functionality as separate things. The GPIO controller is
cascaded from the point of view of the GPIOs and how the Linux virtual
interrupts are mapped to physical interrupts. On the other hand the GPIO
controller is hierarchical from an IRQ domain point of view because some
of the GPIO interrupts also have a parent interrupt in the PMC.

I hope that clarifies things a little bit. More specifically the
irq_chip_set_type_parent() isn't actually going to cause the type to be
set on the cascaded interrupts that go to the GIC, but on the parent
interrupts within the PMC (i.e. the wake events) which have separate
registers to program the type and wake enables.

Note that because not all GPIOs may have a corresponding wake event
(i.e. no parent, hierarchically speaking) that's also why we first
check for data->parent_data. See this email thread for a bit more
background information from Marc, who added proper support for this
recently:

	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201007124544.1397322-1-maz@kernel.org/

Thierry
Bartosz Golaszewski Jan. 6, 2021, 10:59 a.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 3:49 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> >

> > I don't quite get this. This makes sense if there is one parent IRQ

> > per interrupt, but if one of the users of a GPIO in a bank sets the

> > IRQ type to edge and then another one comes in and set another

> > of the lines to level and then the function comes here, what type

> > gets set on the parent? Whichever comes last?

> >

> > Normally with banked GPIOs collecting several lines in a cascaded

> > fashion, the GPIO out of the bank toward the GIC is level triggered.

> >

> > I don't understand how this GPIO controller can be hierarchical,

> > it looks cascaded by the definition of the document

> > Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst

>

> This is basically the same implementation that we've used in the

> gpio-tegra186 driver. The goal here is to support wake events, which are

> a mechanism for the PMC (which, among other things control wakeup of the

> CPU complex from sleep). Wake events are a somewhat non-trivial concept

> and I keep second-guessing this myself everytime I look at it...

>

> So basically with these wake events we have a selected number of GPIOs

> that are routed to the PMC and which can wake the system from sleep. To

> make this work, the PMC IRQ domain becomes the parent of the GPIO IRQ

> domain, so what we're forwarding the ->set_type() and ->set_wake()

> operations to here is the PMC parent, rather than the parent IRQs which

> are, I suppose, somewhat unfortunately named for this particular use-

> case.

>

> I suppose given the definition in the documentation the GPIO controller

> is both hierarchical (it's a child of the PMC IRQ domain) and cascaded

> (sets of GPIOs routed to a number of "parent" interrupts).

>

> What usually helps me in understanding this better is to look at GPIO

> and IRQ functionality as separate things. The GPIO controller is

> cascaded from the point of view of the GPIOs and how the Linux virtual

> interrupts are mapped to physical interrupts. On the other hand the GPIO

> controller is hierarchical from an IRQ domain point of view because some

> of the GPIO interrupts also have a parent interrupt in the PMC.

>

> I hope that clarifies things a little bit. More specifically the

> irq_chip_set_type_parent() isn't actually going to cause the type to be

> set on the cascaded interrupts that go to the GIC, but on the parent

> interrupts within the PMC (i.e. the wake events) which have separate

> registers to program the type and wake enables.

>

> Note that because not all GPIOs may have a corresponding wake event

> (i.e. no parent, hierarchically speaking) that's also why we first

> check for data->parent_data. See this email thread for a bit more

> background information from Marc, who added proper support for this

> recently:

>


It's clear to me that I need to finally educate myself more on
hierarchical IRQs. I don't want to block this patch though until that
happens. I trust that Thierry knows what he's doing here and so I've
applied it for next.

Bart
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
index e19ebff6018c..b8a4fd07c559 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@  struct tegra_gpio_info;
 
 struct tegra_gpio_bank {
 	unsigned int bank;
-	unsigned int irq;
 
 	/*
 	 * IRQ-core code uses raw locking, and thus, nested locking also
@@ -81,7 +80,6 @@  struct tegra_gpio_bank {
 	u32 dbc_enb[4];
 #endif
 	u32 dbc_cnt[4];
-	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi;
 };
 
 struct tegra_gpio_soc_config {
@@ -93,12 +91,12 @@  struct tegra_gpio_soc_config {
 struct tegra_gpio_info {
 	struct device				*dev;
 	void __iomem				*regs;
-	struct irq_domain			*irq_domain;
 	struct tegra_gpio_bank			*bank_info;
 	const struct tegra_gpio_soc_config	*soc;
 	struct gpio_chip			gc;
 	struct irq_chip				ic;
 	u32					bank_count;
+	unsigned int				*irqs;
 };
 
 static inline void tegra_gpio_writel(struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi,
@@ -274,17 +272,10 @@  static int tegra_gpio_set_config(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
 	return tegra_gpio_set_debounce(chip, offset, debounce);
 }
 
-static int tegra_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
-{
-	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
-
-	return irq_find_mapping(tgi->irq_domain, offset);
-}
-
 static void tegra_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
-	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = bank->tgi;
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
 	unsigned int gpio = d->hwirq;
 
 	tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, 1 << GPIO_BIT(gpio), GPIO_INT_CLR(tgi, gpio));
@@ -292,8 +283,8 @@  static void tegra_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
 
 static void tegra_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
-	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = bank->tgi;
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
 	unsigned int gpio = d->hwirq;
 
 	tegra_gpio_mask_write(tgi, GPIO_MSK_INT_ENB(tgi, gpio), gpio, 0);
@@ -301,8 +292,8 @@  static void tegra_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
 
 static void tegra_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
-	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = bank->tgi;
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
 	unsigned int gpio = d->hwirq;
 
 	tegra_gpio_mask_write(tgi, GPIO_MSK_INT_ENB(tgi, gpio), gpio, 1);
@@ -311,11 +302,14 @@  static void tegra_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
 static int tegra_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
 {
 	unsigned int gpio = d->hwirq, port = GPIO_PORT(gpio), lvl_type;
-	struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
-	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = bank->tgi;
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+	struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	u32 val;
 	int ret;
+	u32 val;
+
+	bank = &tgi->bank_info[GPIO_BANK(d->hwirq)];
 
 	switch (type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
 	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
@@ -367,13 +361,16 @@  static int tegra_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
 	else if (type & (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING))
 		irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_edge_irq);
 
-	return 0;
+	if (d->parent_data)
+		ret = irq_chip_set_type_parent(d, type);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void tegra_gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
-	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = bank->tgi;
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
 	unsigned int gpio = d->hwirq;
 
 	tegra_gpio_irq_mask(d);
@@ -382,13 +379,25 @@  static void tegra_gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
 
 static void tegra_gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
-	unsigned int port, pin, gpio;
+	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
+	struct irq_domain *domain = tgi->gc.irq.domain;
+	unsigned int irq = irq_desc_get_irq(desc);
+	struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank = NULL;
+	unsigned int port, pin, gpio, i;
 	bool unmasked = false;
-	u32 lvl;
 	unsigned long sta;
-	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
-	struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
-	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = bank->tgi;
+	u32 lvl;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < tgi->bank_count; i++) {
+		if (tgi->irqs[i] == irq) {
+			bank = &tgi->bank_info[i];
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (WARN_ON(bank == NULL))
+		return;
 
 	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
 
@@ -411,14 +420,44 @@  static void tegra_gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
 				chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
 			}
 
-			generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(tgi->irq_domain,
-							    gpio + pin));
+			irq = irq_find_mapping(domain, gpio + pin);
+			if (WARN_ON(irq == 0))
+				continue;
+
+			generic_handle_irq(irq);
 		}
 	}
 
 	if (!unmasked)
 		chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
+}
+
+static int tegra_gpio_child_to_parent_hwirq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int hwirq,
+					    unsigned int type, unsigned int *parent_hwirq,
+					    unsigned int *parent_type)
+{
+	*parent_hwirq = chip->irq.child_offset_to_irq(chip, hwirq);
+	*parent_type = type;
 
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void *tegra_gpio_populate_parent_fwspec(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int parent_hwirq,
+					       unsigned int parent_type)
+{
+	struct irq_fwspec *fwspec;
+
+	fwspec = kmalloc(sizeof(*fwspec), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!fwspec)
+		return NULL;
+
+	fwspec->fwnode = chip->irq.parent_domain->fwnode;
+	fwspec->param_count = 3;
+	fwspec->param[0] = 0;
+	fwspec->param[1] = parent_hwirq;
+	fwspec->param[2] = parent_type;
+
+	return fwspec;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
@@ -497,14 +536,13 @@  static int tegra_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
 
 static int tegra_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int enable)
 {
-	struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+	struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank;
 	unsigned int gpio = d->hwirq;
 	u32 port, bit, mask;
-	int err;
 
-	err = irq_set_irq_wake(bank->irq, enable);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
+	bank = &tgi->bank_info[GPIO_BANK(d->hwirq)];
 
 	port = GPIO_PORT(gpio);
 	bit = GPIO_BIT(gpio);
@@ -515,10 +553,41 @@  static int tegra_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int enable)
 	else
 		bank->wake_enb[port] &= ~mask;
 
+	if (d->parent_data)
+		return irq_chip_set_wake_parent(d, enable);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif
 
+static int tegra_gpio_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *dest,
+				       bool force)
+{
+	if (data->parent_data)
+		return irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(data, dest, force);
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static int tegra_gpio_irq_request_resources(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+
+	tegra_gpio_enable(tgi, d->hwirq);
+
+	return gpiochip_reqres_irq(chip, d->hwirq);
+}
+
+static void tegra_gpio_irq_release_resources(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+
+	gpiochip_relres_irq(chip, d->hwirq);
+	tegra_gpio_enable(tgi, d->hwirq);
+}
+
 #ifdef	CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
@@ -568,14 +637,18 @@  static const struct dev_pm_ops tegra_gpio_pm_ops = {
 	SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(tegra_gpio_suspend, tegra_gpio_resume)
 };
 
-static struct lock_class_key gpio_lock_class;
-static struct lock_class_key gpio_request_class;
+static const struct of_device_id tegra_pmc_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra210-pmc", },
+	{ /* sentinel */ },
+};
 
 static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi;
 	struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank;
-	unsigned int gpio, i, j;
+	struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi;
+	struct gpio_irq_chip *irq;
+	struct device_node *np;
+	unsigned int i, j;
 	int ret;
 
 	tgi = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*tgi), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -604,7 +677,6 @@  static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	tgi->gc.direction_output	= tegra_gpio_direction_output;
 	tgi->gc.set			= tegra_gpio_set;
 	tgi->gc.get_direction		= tegra_gpio_get_direction;
-	tgi->gc.to_irq			= tegra_gpio_to_irq;
 	tgi->gc.base			= 0;
 	tgi->gc.ngpio			= tgi->bank_count * 32;
 	tgi->gc.parent			= &pdev->dev;
@@ -619,6 +691,9 @@  static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 	tgi->ic.irq_set_wake		= tegra_gpio_irq_set_wake;
 #endif
+	tgi->ic.irq_set_affinity	= tegra_gpio_irq_set_affinity;
+	tgi->ic.irq_request_resources	= tegra_gpio_irq_request_resources;
+	tgi->ic.irq_release_resources	= tegra_gpio_irq_release_resources;
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tgi);
 
@@ -630,11 +705,9 @@  static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!tgi->bank_info)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	tgi->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pdev->dev.of_node,
-						tgi->gc.ngpio,
-						&irq_domain_simple_ops, NULL);
-	if (!tgi->irq_domain)
-		return -ENODEV;
+	tgi->irqs = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, tgi->bank_count, sizeof(*tgi->irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!tgi->irqs)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < tgi->bank_count; i++) {
 		ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
@@ -643,8 +716,34 @@  static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 		bank = &tgi->bank_info[i];
 		bank->bank = i;
-		bank->irq = ret;
-		bank->tgi = tgi;
+
+		tgi->irqs[i] = ret;
+
+		for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
+			raw_spin_lock_init(&bank->lvl_lock[j]);
+			spin_lock_init(&bank->dbc_lock[j]);
+		}
+	}
+
+	irq = &tgi->gc.irq;
+	irq->chip = &tgi->ic;
+	irq->fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(pdev->dev.of_node);
+	irq->child_to_parent_hwirq = tegra_gpio_child_to_parent_hwirq;
+	irq->populate_parent_alloc_arg = tegra_gpio_populate_parent_fwspec;
+	irq->handler = handle_simple_irq;
+	irq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
+	irq->parent_handler = tegra_gpio_irq_handler;
+	irq->parent_handler_data = tgi;
+	irq->num_parents = tgi->bank_count;
+	irq->parents = tgi->irqs;
+
+	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, tegra_pmc_of_match);
+	if (np) {
+		irq->parent_domain = irq_find_host(np);
+		of_node_put(np);
+
+		if (!irq->parent_domain)
+			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
 	}
 
 	tgi->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
@@ -660,33 +759,8 @@  static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &tgi->gc, tgi);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		irq_domain_remove(tgi->irq_domain);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	}
-
-	for (gpio = 0; gpio < tgi->gc.ngpio; gpio++) {
-		int irq = irq_create_mapping(tgi->irq_domain, gpio);
-		/* No validity check; all Tegra GPIOs are valid IRQs */
-
-		bank = &tgi->bank_info[GPIO_BANK(gpio)];
-
-		irq_set_chip_data(irq, bank);
-		irq_set_lockdep_class(irq, &gpio_lock_class, &gpio_request_class);
-		irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &tgi->ic, handle_simple_irq);
-	}
-
-	for (i = 0; i < tgi->bank_count; i++) {
-		bank = &tgi->bank_info[i];
-
-		irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(bank->irq,
-						 tegra_gpio_irq_handler, bank);
-
-		for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
-			raw_spin_lock_init(&bank->lvl_lock[j]);
-			spin_lock_init(&bank->dbc_lock[j]);
-		}
-	}
 
 	tegra_gpio_debuginit(tgi);