Message ID | 20220602053250.62593-1-chanho61.park@samsung.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | support secondary ufs for Exynos Auto v9 SoC | expand |
On 02/06/2022 07:32, Chanho Park wrote: > Drop "ufs0-" label name usage of ufs phy and hci nodes. > Regarding the comments of reg properties, we don't need to illustrate here > because we can find the description from the dt-binding doc. > > Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com> This does not apply. Can you rebase and send the DTS patches as separate patchset? Best regards, Krzysztof
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 14:32:48 +0900, Chanho Park wrote: > Drop "ufs0-" label name usage of ufs phy and hci nodes. > Regarding the comments of reg properties, we don't need to illustrate here > because we can find the description from the dt-binding doc. > > Applied, thanks! [4/6] arm64: dts: exynosautov9: adjust DT style of ufs nodes https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/283d046406c22409d45b3ab31a4c93fe94b66349 Best regards,
On 07/06/2022 07:21, Chanho Park wrote: >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: exynosautov9: adjust DT style of >> ufs nodes >> >> On 02/06/2022 07:32, Chanho Park wrote: >>> Drop "ufs0-" label name usage of ufs phy and hci nodes. >>> Regarding the comments of reg properties, we don't need to illustrate >>> here because we can find the description from the dt-binding doc. >>> >>> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com> >> >> This does not apply. Can you rebase and send the DTS patches as separate >> patchset? > > I forgot to point the baseline of this patchset. I stacked this patch on top of below patch. > If you do not apply below patch or put this separate branch, I'll rebase this patchset without below patch. > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20220526204323.832243-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/ Oh, thanks! Unfortunately it helped for the patch #4 (first of DTS) but not for the next one. Maybe some other patch caused the hunks to differ. Please rebase remaining two DTS patches. Best regards, Krzysztof