Message ID | 20240109091708.66977-1-akhilrajeev@nvidia.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add Tegra Security Engine driver | expand |
> On 09/01/2024 10:17, Akhil R wrote: > > Add DT binding document for Tegra Security Engine. > > The AES and HASH algorithms are handled independently by separate > > engines within the Security Engine. These engines are registered > > as two separate crypto engine drivers. > > > > ... > > > +required: > > + - compatible > > + - reg > > + - clocks > > + - iommus > > + > > +additionalProperties: false > > + > > +examples: > > + - | > > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > > This does not look used. > > > + #include <dt-bindings/memory/tegra234-mc.h> > > + #include <dt-bindings/clock/tegra234-clock.h> > > + > > + crypto@15820000 { > > + compatible = "nvidia,tegra234-se-aes"; > > + reg = <0x15820000 0x10000>; > > + clocks = <&bpmp TEGRA234_CLK_SE>; > > + iommus = <&smmu TEGRA234_SID_SES_SE1>; > > + dma-coherent; > > + }; > > +... > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/nvidia,tegra234-se- > hash.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/nvidia,tegra234-se- > hash.yaml > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..7fb32568756d > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/nvidia,tegra234-se- > hash.yaml > > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/crypto/nvidia,tegra234-se-hash.yaml# > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > + > > +title: NVIDIA Tegra Security Engine for HASH algorithms > > + > > +description: > > + The Tegra Security HASH Engine accelerates the following HASH functions - > > + SHA1, SHA224, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA3-224, SHA3-256, SHA3-384, > SHA3-512 > > + HMAC(SHA224), HMAC(SHA256), HMAC(SHA384), HMAC(SHA512) > > + > > +maintainers: > > + - Akhil R <akhilrajeev@nvidia.com> > > + > > +properties: > > + compatible: > > + const: nvidia,tegra234-se-hash > > + > > + reg: > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + clocks: > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + iommus: > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + dma-coherent: true > > + > > +required: > > + - compatible > > + - reg > > + - clocks > > + - iommus > > + > > +additionalProperties: false > > + > > +examples: > > + - | > > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > > This does not look used. > > > + #include <dt-bindings/memory/tegra234-mc.h> > > + #include <dt-bindings/clock/tegra234-clock.h> > > + > > With both above fixed: > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > > --- > > This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags > are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do > not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended). > If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new > versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when > provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 > can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add > the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the > version they apply. > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5- > rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 > Thanks. Noted. Will update them. Best Regards, Akhil