diff mbox series

[v26,29/33] ALSA: usb-audio: qcom: Don't allow USB offload path if PCM device is in use

Message ID 20240829194105.1504814-30-quic_wcheng@quicinc.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series Introduce QC USB SND audio offloading support | expand

Commit Message

Wesley Cheng Aug. 29, 2024, 7:41 p.m. UTC
Add proper checks and updates to the USB substream once receiving a USB QMI
stream enable request.  If the substream is already in use from the non
offload path, reject the stream enable request.  In addition, update the
USB substream opened parameter when enabling the offload path, so the
non offload path can be blocked.

Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
---
 sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Pierre-Louis Bossart Aug. 30, 2024, 9:55 a.m. UTC | #1
On 8/29/24 21:41, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> Add proper checks and updates to the USB substream once receiving a USB QMI
> stream enable request.  If the substream is already in use from the non
> offload path, reject the stream enable request.  In addition, update the
> USB substream opened parameter when enabling the offload path, so the
> non offload path can be blocked.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c b/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c
> index e9f2fd6bbb41..0bd533f539e4 100644
> --- a/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c
> +++ b/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c
> @@ -1482,12 +1482,17 @@ static void handle_uaudio_stream_req(struct qmi_handle *handle,
>  		goto response;
>  	}
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
>  	if (req_msg->enable) {
> -		if (info_idx < 0 || chip->system_suspend) {
> +		if (info_idx < 0 || chip->system_suspend || subs->opened) {
>  			ret = -EBUSY;
> +			mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
> +
>  			goto response;
>  		}
> +		subs->opened = 1;
>  	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
>  
>  	if (req_msg->service_interval_valid) {
>  		ret = get_data_interval_from_si(subs,
> @@ -1509,6 +1514,11 @@ static void handle_uaudio_stream_req(struct qmi_handle *handle,
>  		if (!ret)
>  			ret = prepare_qmi_response(subs, req_msg, &resp,
>  						   info_idx);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
> +			subs->opened = 0;
> +			mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
> +		}
>  	} else {
>  		info = &uadev[pcm_card_num].info[info_idx];
>  		if (info->data_ep_pipe) {
> @@ -1532,6 +1542,9 @@ static void handle_uaudio_stream_req(struct qmi_handle *handle,
>  		}
>  
>  		disable_audio_stream(subs);
> +		mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
> +		subs->opened = 0;
> +		mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
>  	}
>  


This sounds ok but I wonder why all this needs to be done in
Qualcomm-specific layers instead of soc-usb?
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c b/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c
index e9f2fd6bbb41..0bd533f539e4 100644
--- a/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c
+++ b/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c
@@ -1482,12 +1482,17 @@  static void handle_uaudio_stream_req(struct qmi_handle *handle,
 		goto response;
 	}
 
+	mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
 	if (req_msg->enable) {
-		if (info_idx < 0 || chip->system_suspend) {
+		if (info_idx < 0 || chip->system_suspend || subs->opened) {
 			ret = -EBUSY;
+			mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
+
 			goto response;
 		}
+		subs->opened = 1;
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
 
 	if (req_msg->service_interval_valid) {
 		ret = get_data_interval_from_si(subs,
@@ -1509,6 +1514,11 @@  static void handle_uaudio_stream_req(struct qmi_handle *handle,
 		if (!ret)
 			ret = prepare_qmi_response(subs, req_msg, &resp,
 						   info_idx);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
+			subs->opened = 0;
+			mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
+		}
 	} else {
 		info = &uadev[pcm_card_num].info[info_idx];
 		if (info->data_ep_pipe) {
@@ -1532,6 +1542,9 @@  static void handle_uaudio_stream_req(struct qmi_handle *handle,
 		}
 
 		disable_audio_stream(subs);
+		mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
+		subs->opened = 0;
+		mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
 	}
 
 response: