mbox series

[API-NEXT,0/2] event subtype implementation

Message ID 20170614173527.17118-1-dmitry.ereminsolenikov@linaro.org
Headers show
Series event subtype implementation | expand

Message

Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov June 14, 2017, 5:35 p.m. UTC 
Applies on top of [API-NEXT PATCH v2 0/3] IPSEC packet event

These patches provide event subtype implementation and tests. Ideally they
should be merged together with event subtypes API definitions.

Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov (2):
  linux-generic: events subtype implementation
  validation: test correctness of events subtype implementation

 .../linux-generic/include/odp_buffer_inlines.h     |  2 ++
 .../linux-generic/include/odp_buffer_internal.h    |  3 ++
 platform/linux-generic/odp_event.c                 |  5 +++
 platform/linux-generic/odp_packet.c                |  1 +
 platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c                  | 11 +++++++
 test/common_plat/validation/api/buffer/buffer.c    | 37 ++++++++++++++--------
 test/common_plat/validation/api/packet/packet.c    |  5 +++
 test/common_plat/validation/api/timer/timer.c      | 14 ++++++--
 8 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

Comments

Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov June 24, 2017, 6:01 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 14.06.2017 20:35, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Applies on top of [API-NEXT PATCH v2 0/3] IPSEC packet event

> 

> These patches provide event subtype implementation and tests. Ideally they

> should be merged together with event subtypes API definitions.

> 

> Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov (2):

>   linux-generic: events subtype implementation

>   validation: test correctness of events subtype implementation


Any further feedback on these patches? Event subtypes API patches were
merged, so it would be good to get implementation in.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry