| Message ID | 20161025202121.1070879-1-arnd@arndb.de |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c index 680d60eabc75..ed93bf3474ec 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c @@ -379,7 +379,6 @@ static int wsm_multi_tx_confirm(struct cw1200_common *priv, { int ret; int count; - int i; count = WSM_GET32(buf); if (WARN_ON(count <= 0)) @@ -395,11 +394,10 @@ static int wsm_multi_tx_confirm(struct cw1200_common *priv, } cw1200_debug_txed_multi(priv, count); - for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) { + do { ret = wsm_tx_confirm(priv, buf, link_id); - if (ret) - return ret; - } + } while (!ret && --count); + return ret; underflow:
On x86, the cw1200 driver produces a rather silly warning about the possible use of the 'ret' variable without an initialization presumably after being confused by the architecture specific definition of WARN_ON: drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c: In function ‘wsm_handle_rx’: drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c:1457:9: error: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] We have already checked that 'count' is larger than 0 here, so we know that 'ret' is initialized. Changing the 'for' loop into do/while also makes this clear to the compiler. Suggested-by: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) v2: rewrite based on David Laight's suggestion, the first version was completely wrong. -- 2.9.0