@@ -2488,9 +2488,9 @@ void rtl8821ae_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter(
for (p = RF90_PATH_A; p < MAX_PATH_NUM_8821A; p++)
rtldm->swing_idx_ofdm_base[p] = rtldm->swing_idx_ofdm[p];
- RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_POWER_TRACKING, DBG_LOUD,
- "pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.ThermalValue = %d ThermalValue= %d\n",
- rtldm->thermalvalue, thermal_value);
+ RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_POWER_TRACKING, DBG_LOUD,
+ "pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.ThermalValue = %d ThermalValue= %d\n",
+ rtldm->thermalvalue, thermal_value);
/*Record last Power Tracking Thermal Value*/
rtldm->thermalvalue = thermal_value;
}
The rtl8821ae_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter function contains a call to RT_TRACE() that is indented in a misleading way, as pointed out by a gcc-6 warning: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/dm.c: In function 'rtl8821ae_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter': drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/dm.c:2491:4: error: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_POWER_TRACKING, DBG_LOUD, ^~~~~~~~ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/dm.c:2488:3: note: ...this 'for' clause, but it is not for (p = RF90_PATH_A; p < MAX_PATH_NUM_8821A; p++) ^~~ It is clear from the context that the call was not meant to be part of the loop and only the indentation is wrong, so this removes the extra tabs. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/dm.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.7.0