@@ -55,13 +55,14 @@
(udata)->outlen = (olen); \
} while (0)
-#define INIT_UDATA_BUF_OR_NULL(udata, ibuf, obuf, ilen, olen) \
- do { \
- (udata)->inbuf = (ilen) ? (const void __user *) (ibuf) : NULL; \
- (udata)->outbuf = (olen) ? (void __user *) (obuf) : NULL; \
- (udata)->inlen = (ilen); \
- (udata)->outlen = (olen); \
- } while (0)
+static inline void
+ib_uverbs_init_udata_buf_or_null(struct ib_udata *udata,
+ const void __user *ibuf,
+ void __user *obuf,
+ size_t ilen, size_t olen)
+{
+ INIT_UDATA(udata, ilen ? ibuf : NULL, olen ? obuf : NULL, ilen, olen);
+}
/*
* Our lifetime rules for these structs are the following:
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ static ssize_t ib_uverbs_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
}
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE,
- (void __user *) (unsigned long) ex_hdr.response,
+ u64_to_user_ptr(ex_hdr.response),
(hdr.out_words + ex_hdr.provider_out_words) * 8)) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto out;
@@ -775,19 +775,17 @@ static ssize_t ib_uverbs_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
}
}
- INIT_UDATA_BUF_OR_NULL(&ucore, buf, (unsigned long) ex_hdr.response,
- hdr.in_words * 8, hdr.out_words * 8);
+ ib_uverbs_init_udata_buf_or_null(&ucore, buf,
+ u64_to_user_ptr(ex_hdr.response),
+ hdr.in_words * 8, hdr.out_words * 8);
- INIT_UDATA_BUF_OR_NULL(&uhw,
- buf + ucore.inlen,
- (unsigned long) ex_hdr.response + ucore.outlen,
- ex_hdr.provider_in_words * 8,
- ex_hdr.provider_out_words * 8);
+ ib_uverbs_init_udata_buf_or_null(&uhw,
+ buf + ucore.inlen,
+ u64_to_user_ptr(ex_hdr.response) + ucore.outlen,
+ ex_hdr.provider_in_words * 8,
+ ex_hdr.provider_out_words * 8);
- ret = uverbs_ex_cmd_table[command](file,
- ib_dev,
- &ucore,
- &uhw);
+ ret = uverbs_ex_cmd_table[command](file, ib_dev, &ucore, &uhw);
if (!ret)
ret = written_count;
} else {
@@ -246,7 +246,8 @@ static void create_udata(struct uverbs_attr_bundle *ctx,
outbuf_len = uhw_out->ptr_attr.len;
}
- INIT_UDATA_BUF_OR_NULL(udata, inbuf, outbuf, inbuf_len, outbuf_len);
+ ib_uverbs_init_udata_buf_or_null(udata, inbuf, outbuf, inbuf_len,
+ outbuf_len);
}
static int uverbs_create_cq_handler(struct ib_device *ib_dev,
We get a harmless warning about the fact that we use the result of a multiplication as a condition: drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c: In function 'ib_uverbs_write': drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c:787:40: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c:787:117: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c:790:50: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c:790:151: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] This avoids the problem by using an inline function in place of the macro. Fixes: a96e4e2ffe43 ("IB/uverbs: New macro to set pointers to NULL if length is 0 in INIT_UDATA()") Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9940777/ Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- v2: completely rewrite the patch to a larger cleanup. --- drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h | 15 ++++++++------- drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c | 22 ++++++++++------------ drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_std_types.c | 3 ++- 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) -- 2.9.0