From patchwork Thu Sep 20 18:48:00 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Paul E. McKenney" X-Patchwork-Id: 11601 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@peony.canonical.com Delivered-To: patchwork@peony.canonical.com Received: from fiordland.canonical.com (fiordland.canonical.com [91.189.94.145]) by peony.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1239C23E54 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f180.google.com (mail-iy0-f180.google.com [209.85.210.180]) by fiordland.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFA7A18604 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-iy0-f180.google.com with SMTP id j25so1863989iaf.11 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:49:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-forwarded-to:x-forwarded-for:delivered-to:received-spf:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to:references :x-content-scanned:x-cbid:x-gm-message-state; bh=pIIaRV3Tvy3BMsLpRKliKlbwxp1Cebf1uCLCVm4o7cY=; b=NNScxkNQ+sWM1xxYR3V6cCRUjzvL9DNqBLBbm1vYeJbXwnkx93rG6lPz4yEU4DThR6 dKqhNWRxHPp1sdEJgbOt58z40EP3nOziY6YWdrpe+MnD6LpMUbfeekIEFc39RkrRUA7G C+0e7l4DS8HP9ejOJ+PSgeziHz+rpXRUEKjiRDPXGmYIewIh/BN5ndqPQSd+g/SH97Jp i8LfNB2BPF9qIWfLGP9MdFSWipJRpTn/lPS/nYK1d6ZUg4a2PyjaRzpL0Gt6CMYQiww1 SHPqc7vpHHyGW/fD3RjCmeyLDx/L3baJuszEajyBCv0TE2Y67I7n7IwpHlSWdGgI4scd IDbw== Received: by 10.42.110.130 with SMTP id q2mr2126639icp.53.1348166941161; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:49:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-To: linaro-patchwork@canonical.com X-Forwarded-For: patch@linaro.org linaro-patchwork@canonical.com Delivered-To: patches@linaro.org Received: by 10.50.184.232 with SMTP id ex8csp92232igc; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.12.234 with SMTP id b10mr2096793oec.72.1348166940327; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com (e38.co.us.ibm.com. [32.97.110.159]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lg5si5733266obb.56.2012.09.20.11.49.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.159 as permitted sender) client-ip=32.97.110.159; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.159 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from /spool/local by e38.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:48:59 -0600 Received: from d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.179) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.138) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:48:58 -0600 Received: from d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.107]) by d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835F419D8045 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:48:50 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q8KImWSP262994 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:48:40 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q8KImOjj020821 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:48:29 -0600 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W500 ([9.47.24.72]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id q8KImM7S020661; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:48:22 -0600 Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W500 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD01EEC4F6; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:48:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu, patches@linaro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/23] rcu: Move RCU grace-period cleanup into kthread Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:48:00 -0700 Message-Id: <1348166900-18716-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.8 In-Reply-To: <1348166900-18716-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120920184751.GA18657@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1348166900-18716-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12092018-5518-0000-0000-000007CEF470 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkehSdoJyG0joTHUTumJlLglz03lsJpEs11RcipvQ9z8BeaIaFES9ehX/eYhqQWqte31c5S From: "Paul E. McKenney" As a first step towards allowing grace-period cleanup to be preemptible, this commit moves the RCU grace-period cleanup into the same kthread that is now used to initialize grace periods. This is needed to keep scheduling latency down to a dull roar. Reported-by: Mike Galbraith Reported-by: Dimitri Sivanich Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett --- kernel/rcutree.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c index 59c528f..3cd18ea 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c @@ -1030,6 +1030,7 @@ rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_dat */ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg) { + unsigned long gp_duration; struct rcu_data *rdp; struct rcu_node *rnp; struct rcu_state *rsp = arg; @@ -1114,6 +1115,65 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg) rsp->fqs_state = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT; raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock); put_online_cpus(); + + /* Handle grace-period end. */ + rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp); + for (;;) { + wait_event_interruptible(rsp->gp_wq, + !ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) && + !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)); + if (!ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) && + !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) + break; + flush_signals(current); + } + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags); + gp_duration = jiffies - rsp->gp_start; + if (gp_duration > rsp->gp_max) + rsp->gp_max = gp_duration; + + /* + * We know the grace period is complete, but to everyone else + * it appears to still be ongoing. But it is also the case + * that to everyone else it looks like there is nothing that + * they can do to advance the grace period. It is therefore + * safe for us to drop the lock in order to mark the grace + * period as completed in all of the rcu_node structures. + * + * But if this CPU needs another grace period, it will take + * care of this while initializing the next grace period. + * We use RCU_WAIT_TAIL instead of the usual RCU_DONE_TAIL + * because the callbacks have not yet been advanced: Those + * callbacks are waiting on the grace period that just now + * completed. + */ + if (*rdp->nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL] == NULL) { + raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ + + /* + * Propagate new ->completed value to rcu_node + * structures so that other CPUs don't have to + * wait until the start of the next grace period + * to process their callbacks. + */ + rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) { + /* irqs already disabled. */ + raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); + rnp->completed = rsp->gpnum; + /* irqs remain disabled. */ + raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); + } + rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp); + raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */ + } + + rsp->completed = rsp->gpnum; /* Declare grace period done. */ + trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->completed, "end"); + rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_IDLE; + if (cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) + rsp->gp_flags = 1; + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags); } } @@ -1160,57 +1220,9 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags) static void rcu_report_qs_rsp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags) __releases(rcu_get_root(rsp)->lock) { - unsigned long gp_duration; - struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp); - struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda); - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)); - - /* - * Ensure that all grace-period and pre-grace-period activity - * is seen before the assignment to rsp->completed. - */ - smp_mb(); /* See above block comment. */ - gp_duration = jiffies - rsp->gp_start; - if (gp_duration > rsp->gp_max) - rsp->gp_max = gp_duration; - - /* - * We know the grace period is complete, but to everyone else - * it appears to still be ongoing. But it is also the case - * that to everyone else it looks like there is nothing that - * they can do to advance the grace period. It is therefore - * safe for us to drop the lock in order to mark the grace - * period as completed in all of the rcu_node structures. - * - * But if this CPU needs another grace period, it will take - * care of this while initializing the next grace period. - * We use RCU_WAIT_TAIL instead of the usual RCU_DONE_TAIL - * because the callbacks have not yet been advanced: Those - * callbacks are waiting on the grace period that just now - * completed. - */ - if (*rdp->nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL] == NULL) { - raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ - - /* - * Propagate new ->completed value to rcu_node structures - * so that other CPUs don't have to wait until the start - * of the next grace period to process their callbacks. - */ - rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) { - raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */ - rnp->completed = rsp->gpnum; - raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ - } - rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp); - raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */ - } - - rsp->completed = rsp->gpnum; /* Declare the grace period complete. */ - trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->completed, "end"); - rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_IDLE; - rcu_start_gp(rsp, flags); /* releases root node's rnp->lock. */ + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rcu_get_root(rsp)->lock, flags); + wake_up(&rsp->gp_wq); /* Memory barrier implied by wake_up() path. */ } /*