diff mbox

thermal: step_wise: Add missing static storage class specifiers

Message ID 1348743492-30852-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Sachin Kamat Sept. 27, 2012, 10:58 a.m. UTC
Fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/thermal/step_wise.c:153:5: warning:
symbol 'step_wise_throttle' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/thermal/step_wise.c:172:25: warning:
symbol 'thermal_gov_step_wise' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/thermal/step_wise.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

R, Durgadoss Sept. 27, 2012, 11:15 a.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sachin Kamat [mailto:sachin.kamat@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 4:28 PM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: R, Durgadoss; Zhang, Rui; sachin.kamat@linaro.org; patches@linaro.org
> Subject: [PATCH] thermal: step_wise: Add missing static storage class
> specifiers
> 
> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
> drivers/thermal/step_wise.c:153:5: warning:
> symbol 'step_wise_throttle' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/thermal/step_wise.c:172:25: warning:
> symbol 'thermal_gov_step_wise' was not declared. Should it be static?

Looks fine.
Acked-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>

Care to fix the same things in fair_share.c and user_space.c ?

Thanks,
Durga

> 
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/step_wise.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> index 3f9cfcf..1242cff 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct
> thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
>   * step. If the zone is 'cooling down' it brings back the performance of
>   * the devices by one step.
>   */
> -int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> +static int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
>  {
>  	struct thermal_instance *instance;
> 
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device
> *tz, int trip)
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> -struct thermal_governor thermal_gov_step_wise = {
> +static struct thermal_governor thermal_gov_step_wise = {
>  	.name		= DEFAULT_THERMAL_GOVERNOR,
>  	.throttle	= step_wise_throttle,
>  	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
> --
> 1.7.4.1
Sachin Kamat Sept. 27, 2012, 11:21 a.m. UTC | #2
On 27 September 2012 16:45, R, Durgadoss <durgadoss.r@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sachin Kamat [mailto:sachin.kamat@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 4:28 PM
>> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: R, Durgadoss; Zhang, Rui; sachin.kamat@linaro.org; patches@linaro.org
>> Subject: [PATCH] thermal: step_wise: Add missing static storage class
>> specifiers
>>
>> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
>> drivers/thermal/step_wise.c:153:5: warning:
>> symbol 'step_wise_throttle' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/thermal/step_wise.c:172:25: warning:
>> symbol 'thermal_gov_step_wise' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Looks fine.
> Acked-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
>
> Care to fix the same things in fair_share.c and user_space.c ?

Sure. Right away :)

>
> Thanks,
> Durga
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/thermal/step_wise.c |    4 ++--
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
>> index 3f9cfcf..1242cff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
>> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct
>> thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
>>   * step. If the zone is 'cooling down' it brings back the performance of
>>   * the devices by one step.
>>   */
>> -int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
>> +static int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
>>  {
>>       struct thermal_instance *instance;
>>
>> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device
>> *tz, int trip)
>>       return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> -struct thermal_governor thermal_gov_step_wise = {
>> +static struct thermal_governor thermal_gov_step_wise = {
>>       .name           = DEFAULT_THERMAL_GOVERNOR,
>>       .throttle       = step_wise_throttle,
>>       .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>> --
>> 1.7.4.1
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
index 3f9cfcf..1242cff 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@  static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
  * step. If the zone is 'cooling down' it brings back the performance of
  * the devices by one step.
  */
-int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
+static int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
 {
 	struct thermal_instance *instance;
 
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@  int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-struct thermal_governor thermal_gov_step_wise = {
+static struct thermal_governor thermal_gov_step_wise = {
 	.name		= DEFAULT_THERMAL_GOVERNOR,
 	.throttle	= step_wise_throttle,
 	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,