diff mbox series

CIFS: SMBD: work around gcc -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

Message ID 20180110205137.2044979-1-arnd@arndb.de
State Accepted
Commit e36c048a9bd853b64c2b32a2ed90be2eff9bbd62
Headers show
Series CIFS: SMBD: work around gcc -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning | expand

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann Jan. 10, 2018, 8:51 p.m. UTC
GCC versions from 4.9 to 6.3 produce a false-positive warning when
dealing with a conditional spin_lock_irqsave():

fs/cifs/smbdirect.c: In function 'smbd_recv_buf':
include/linux/spinlock.h:260:3: warning: 'flags' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

This function calls some sleeping interfaces, so it is clear that it
does not get called with interrupts disabled and there is no need
to save the irq state before taking the spinlock. This lets us
remove the variable, which makes the function slightly more efficient
and avoids the warning.

A further cleanup could do the same change for other functions in this
file, but I did not want to take this too far for now.

Fixes: ac69f66e54ca ("CIFS: SMBD: Implement function to receive data via RDMA receive")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

---
 fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-- 
2.9.0

Comments

Long Li Jan. 10, 2018, 9:55 p.m. UTC | #1
> GCC versions from 4.9 to 6.3 produce a false-positive warning when dealing

> with a conditional spin_lock_irqsave():

> 

> fs/cifs/smbdirect.c: In function 'smbd_recv_buf':

> include/linux/spinlock.h:260:3: warning: 'flags' may be used uninitialized in

> this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

> 

> This function calls some sleeping interfaces, so it is clear that it does not get

> called with interrupts disabled and there is no need to save the irq state

> before taking the spinlock. This lets us remove the variable, which makes the

> function slightly more efficient and avoids the warning.

> 

> A further cleanup could do the same change for other functions in this file,

> but I did not want to take this too far for now.

> 

> Fixes: ac69f66e54ca ("CIFS: SMBD: Implement function to receive data via

> RDMA receive")

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>


Reviewed-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>


> ---

>  fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 15 ++++++---------

>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c index

> f527e22650f5..f9234ed83a60 100644

> --- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c

> +++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c

> @@ -1862,7 +1862,6 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info,

> char *buf, unsigned int size)

>  	int to_copy, to_read, data_read, offset;

>  	u32 data_length, remaining_data_length, data_offset;

>  	int rc;

> -	unsigned long flags;

> 

>  again:

>  	if (info->transport_status != SMBD_CONNECTED) { @@ -1935,15

> +1934,13 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf,

> unsigned int size)

>  				 * end of the queue

>  				 */

>  				if (!queue_length)

> -					spin_lock_irqsave(

> -						&info-

> >reassembly_queue_lock,

> -						flags);

> +					spin_lock_irq(

> +						&info-

> >reassembly_queue_lock);

>  				list_del(&response->list);

>  				queue_removed++;

>  				if (!queue_length)

> -					spin_unlock_irqrestore(

> -						&info-

> >reassembly_queue_lock,

> -						flags);

> +					spin_unlock_irq(

> +						&info-

> >reassembly_queue_lock);

> 

>  				info->count_reassembly_queue--;

>  				info-

> >count_dequeue_reassembly_queue++;

> @@ -1963,10 +1960,10 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection

> *info, char *buf, unsigned int size)

>  				to_read, data_read, offset);

>  		}

> 

> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&info->reassembly_queue_lock, flags);

> +		spin_lock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock);

>  		info->reassembly_data_length -= data_read;

>  		info->reassembly_queue_length -= queue_removed;

> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->reassembly_queue_lock,

> flags);

> +		spin_unlock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock);

> 

>  		info->first_entry_offset = offset;

>  		log_read(INFO, "returning to thread data_read=%d "

> --

> 2.9.0
Steve French Jan. 14, 2018, 7:07 p.m. UTC | #2
merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next

Also noticed a few sparse warnings in the same file that need to be cleaned up

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> GCC versions from 4.9 to 6.3 produce a false-positive warning when

> dealing with a conditional spin_lock_irqsave():

>

> fs/cifs/smbdirect.c: In function 'smbd_recv_buf':

> include/linux/spinlock.h:260:3: warning: 'flags' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

>

> This function calls some sleeping interfaces, so it is clear that it

> does not get called with interrupts disabled and there is no need

> to save the irq state before taking the spinlock. This lets us

> remove the variable, which makes the function slightly more efficient

> and avoids the warning.

>

> A further cleanup could do the same change for other functions in this

> file, but I did not want to take this too far for now.

>

> Fixes: ac69f66e54ca ("CIFS: SMBD: Implement function to receive data via RDMA receive")

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

> ---

>  fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 15 ++++++---------

>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

>

> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c

> index f527e22650f5..f9234ed83a60 100644

> --- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c

> +++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c

> @@ -1862,7 +1862,6 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size)

>         int to_copy, to_read, data_read, offset;

>         u32 data_length, remaining_data_length, data_offset;

>         int rc;

> -       unsigned long flags;

>

>  again:

>         if (info->transport_status != SMBD_CONNECTED) {

> @@ -1935,15 +1934,13 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size)

>                                  * end of the queue

>                                  */

>                                 if (!queue_length)

> -                                       spin_lock_irqsave(

> -                                               &info->reassembly_queue_lock,

> -                                               flags);

> +                                       spin_lock_irq(

> +                                               &info->reassembly_queue_lock);

>                                 list_del(&response->list);

>                                 queue_removed++;

>                                 if (!queue_length)

> -                                       spin_unlock_irqrestore(

> -                                               &info->reassembly_queue_lock,

> -                                               flags);

> +                                       spin_unlock_irq(

> +                                               &info->reassembly_queue_lock);

>

>                                 info->count_reassembly_queue--;

>                                 info->count_dequeue_reassembly_queue++;

> @@ -1963,10 +1960,10 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size)

>                                 to_read, data_read, offset);

>                 }

>

> -               spin_lock_irqsave(&info->reassembly_queue_lock, flags);

> +               spin_lock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock);

>                 info->reassembly_data_length -= data_read;

>                 info->reassembly_queue_length -= queue_removed;

> -               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->reassembly_queue_lock, flags);

> +               spin_unlock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock);

>

>                 info->first_entry_offset = offset;

>                 log_read(INFO, "returning to thread data_read=%d "

> --

> 2.9.0

>

> --

> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in

> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




-- 
Thanks,

Steve
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
index f527e22650f5..f9234ed83a60 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
@@ -1862,7 +1862,6 @@  int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size)
 	int to_copy, to_read, data_read, offset;
 	u32 data_length, remaining_data_length, data_offset;
 	int rc;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 again:
 	if (info->transport_status != SMBD_CONNECTED) {
@@ -1935,15 +1934,13 @@  int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size)
 				 * end of the queue
 				 */
 				if (!queue_length)
-					spin_lock_irqsave(
-						&info->reassembly_queue_lock,
-						flags);
+					spin_lock_irq(
+						&info->reassembly_queue_lock);
 				list_del(&response->list);
 				queue_removed++;
 				if (!queue_length)
-					spin_unlock_irqrestore(
-						&info->reassembly_queue_lock,
-						flags);
+					spin_unlock_irq(
+						&info->reassembly_queue_lock);
 
 				info->count_reassembly_queue--;
 				info->count_dequeue_reassembly_queue++;
@@ -1963,10 +1960,10 @@  int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size)
 				to_read, data_read, offset);
 		}
 
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&info->reassembly_queue_lock, flags);
+		spin_lock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock);
 		info->reassembly_data_length -= data_read;
 		info->reassembly_queue_length -= queue_removed;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->reassembly_queue_lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock);
 
 		info->first_entry_offset = offset;
 		log_read(INFO, "returning to thread data_read=%d "