diff mbox series

selinux: fix typo in selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone declaration

Message ID 20180223211235.2402024-1-arnd@arndb.de
State Accepted
Commit 2572f5b4245abf2b4e5a86cabf65a50efda09aac
Headers show
Series selinux: fix typo in selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone declaration | expand

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann Feb. 23, 2018, 9:12 p.m. UTC
A missing 'struct' keyword caused a build error when CONFIG_NETLABEL
is disabled:

In file included from security/selinux/hooks.c:99:
security/selinux/include/netlabel.h:135:66: error: unknown type name 'sock'
 static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, sock *newsk)
                                                                  ^~~~
security/selinux/hooks.c: In function 'selinux_sctp_sk_clone':
security/selinux/hooks.c:5188:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone'; did you mean 'selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Fixes: db97c9f9d312 ("selinux: Add SCTP support")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

---
 security/selinux/include/netlabel.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.9.0

Comments

Paul Moore Feb. 23, 2018, 9:25 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> A missing 'struct' keyword caused a build error when CONFIG_NETLABEL

> is disabled:

>

> In file included from security/selinux/hooks.c:99:

> security/selinux/include/netlabel.h:135:66: error: unknown type name 'sock'

>  static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, sock *newsk)

>                                                                   ^~~~

> security/selinux/hooks.c: In function 'selinux_sctp_sk_clone':

> security/selinux/hooks.c:5188:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone'; did you mean 'selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

>

> Fixes: db97c9f9d312 ("selinux: Add SCTP support")

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

> ---

>  security/selinux/include/netlabel.h | 3 ++-

>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


Thanks, merged and pushed to selinux/next.

Richard was going to submit a patch for that, but I don't think he
would mind you beating him :)

> diff --git a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h

> index 6ef4953431dc..8671de09c363 100644

> --- a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h

> +++ b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h

> @@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ static inline void selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone(struct sock *sk, u16 family)

>  {

>         return;

>  }

> -static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, sock *newsk)

> +static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk,

> +                                               struct sock *newsk)

>  {

>         return;

>  }

> --

> 2.9.0

>


-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Richard Haines Feb. 24, 2018, 10:29 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 16:25 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> > A missing 'struct' keyword caused a build error when

> > CONFIG_NETLABEL

> > is disabled:

> > 

> > In file included from security/selinux/hooks.c:99:

> > security/selinux/include/netlabel.h:135:66: error: unknown type

> > name 'sock'

> >  static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk,

> > sock *newsk)

> >                                                                   ^

> > ~~~

> > security/selinux/hooks.c: In function 'selinux_sctp_sk_clone':

> > security/selinux/hooks.c:5188:2: error: implicit declaration of

> > function 'selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone'; did you mean

> > 'selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone'? [-Werror=implicit-function-

> > declaration]

> > 

> > Fixes: db97c9f9d312 ("selinux: Add SCTP support")

> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

> > ---

> >  security/selinux/include/netlabel.h | 3 ++-

> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

> 

> Thanks, merged and pushed to selinux/next.

> 

> Richard was going to submit a patch for that, but I don't think he

> would mind you beating him :)


Don't mind at all. What I will do then is fix the problem highlighted
by [1] that affects "[PATCH V7 2/4] sctp: Add ip option support", I'll
issue a V8 asap.

[1] https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all/2018-February/043695.html

> 

> > diff --git a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h

> > b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h

> > index 6ef4953431dc..8671de09c363 100644

> > --- a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h

> > +++ b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h

> > @@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ static inline void

> > selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone(struct sock *sk, u16 family)

> >  {

> >         return;

> >  }

> > -static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk,

> > sock *newsk)

> > +static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk,

> > +                                               struct sock *newsk)

> >  {

> >         return;

> >  }

> > --

> > 2.9.0

> > 

> 

>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h
index 6ef4953431dc..8671de09c363 100644
--- a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h
@@ -132,7 +132,8 @@  static inline void selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone(struct sock *sk, u16 family)
 {
 	return;
 }
-static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, sock *newsk)
+static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk,
+						struct sock *newsk)
 {
 	return;
 }