diff mbox series

[1/9] target/arm: Implement vector shifted SCVF/UCVF for fp16

Message ID 20180425012300.14698-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org
State Superseded
Headers show
Series target/arm: Fixups for ARM_FEATURE_V8_FP16 | expand

Commit Message

Richard Henderson April 25, 2018, 1:22 a.m. UTC
While we have some of the scalar paths for *CVF for fp16,
we failed to decode the fp16 version of these instructions.

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

---
 target/arm/translate-a64.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.3

Comments

Alex Bennée April 27, 2018, 4:04 p.m. UTC | #1
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:

> While we have some of the scalar paths for *CVF for fp16,

> we failed to decode the fp16 version of these instructions.

>

> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

> ---

>  target/arm/translate-a64.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------

>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

>

> diff --git a/target/arm/translate-a64.c b/target/arm/translate-a64.c

> index b47319d437..c92e052686 100644

> --- a/target/arm/translate-a64.c

> +++ b/target/arm/translate-a64.c

> @@ -7077,13 +7077,26 @@ static void handle_simd_shift_intfp_conv(DisasContext *s, bool is_scalar,

>                                           int immh, int immb, int opcode,

>                                           int rn, int rd)

>  {

> -    bool is_double = extract32(immh, 3, 1);

> -    int size = is_double ? MO_64 : MO_32;

> -    int elements;

> +    int size, elements, fracbits;

>      int immhb = immh << 3 | immb;

> -    int fracbits = (is_double ? 128 : 64) - immhb;

>

> -    if (!extract32(immh, 2, 2)) {

> +    if (immh & 8) {

> +        size = MO_64;

> +        if (!is_scalar && !is_q) {

> +            unallocated_encoding(s);

> +            return;

> +        }

> +    } else if (immh & 4) {

> +        size = MO_32;

> +    } else if (immh & 2) {

> +        size = MO_16;

> +        if (!arm_dc_feature(s, ARM_FEATURE_V8_FP16)) {

> +            unallocated_encoding(s);

> +            return;

> +        }

> +    } else {

> +        /* immh == 0 would be a failure of the decode logic */

> +        g_assert(immh == 1);

>          unallocated_encoding(s);

>          return;

>      }

> @@ -7091,20 +7104,14 @@ static void handle_simd_shift_intfp_conv(DisasContext *s, bool is_scalar,

>      if (is_scalar) {

>          elements = 1;

>      } else {

> -        elements = is_double ? 2 : is_q ? 4 : 2;

> -        if (is_double && !is_q) {

> -            unallocated_encoding(s);

> -            return;

> -        }

> +        elements = 8 << is_q >> size;


That is a brain exercise for operator precedence. Would:

     elements = (is_q ? 16 : 8) >> size;

be clearer? Personally I'd have probably done it long hand in each size
leg above, e.g:

    size = MO_16;
    elements = is_scalar ? 1 : (is_q ? 8 : 4);

>      }

> +    fracbits = (16 << size) - immhb;


The ship has already sailed on this but I'm wishing we had a
mosize_to_bits() helper function to be explicit about this
transformation.

>

>      if (!fp_access_check(s)) {

>          return;

>      }

>

> -    /* immh == 0 would be a failure of the decode logic */

> -    g_assert(immh);

> -

>      handle_simd_intfp_conv(s, rd, rn, elements, !is_u, fracbits, size);

>  }



--
Alex Bennée
Richard Henderson April 29, 2018, 2:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On 04/27/2018 11:04 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> 

> Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:

> 

>> While we have some of the scalar paths for *CVF for fp16,

>> we failed to decode the fp16 version of these instructions.

>>

>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

>> ---

>>  target/arm/translate-a64.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------

>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

>>

>> diff --git a/target/arm/translate-a64.c b/target/arm/translate-a64.c

>> index b47319d437..c92e052686 100644

>> --- a/target/arm/translate-a64.c

>> +++ b/target/arm/translate-a64.c

>> @@ -7077,13 +7077,26 @@ static void handle_simd_shift_intfp_conv(DisasContext *s, bool is_scalar,

>>                                           int immh, int immb, int opcode,

>>                                           int rn, int rd)

>>  {

>> -    bool is_double = extract32(immh, 3, 1);

>> -    int size = is_double ? MO_64 : MO_32;

>> -    int elements;

>> +    int size, elements, fracbits;

>>      int immhb = immh << 3 | immb;

>> -    int fracbits = (is_double ? 128 : 64) - immhb;

>>

>> -    if (!extract32(immh, 2, 2)) {

>> +    if (immh & 8) {

>> +        size = MO_64;

>> +        if (!is_scalar && !is_q) {

>> +            unallocated_encoding(s);

>> +            return;

>> +        }

>> +    } else if (immh & 4) {

>> +        size = MO_32;

>> +    } else if (immh & 2) {

>> +        size = MO_16;

>> +        if (!arm_dc_feature(s, ARM_FEATURE_V8_FP16)) {

>> +            unallocated_encoding(s);

>> +            return;

>> +        }

>> +    } else {

>> +        /* immh == 0 would be a failure of the decode logic */

>> +        g_assert(immh == 1);

>>          unallocated_encoding(s);

>>          return;

>>      }

>> @@ -7091,20 +7104,14 @@ static void handle_simd_shift_intfp_conv(DisasContext *s, bool is_scalar,

>>      if (is_scalar) {

>>          elements = 1;

>>      } else {

>> -        elements = is_double ? 2 : is_q ? 4 : 2;

>> -        if (is_double && !is_q) {

>> -            unallocated_encoding(s);

>> -            return;

>> -        }

>> +        elements = 8 << is_q >> size;

> 

> That is a brain exercise for operator precedence. Would:

> 

>      elements = (is_q ? 16 : 8) >> size;

> 

> be clearer?


I don't think so myself.  I thought the double conditional harder to follow.

>> +    fracbits = (16 << size) - immhb;

> 

> The ship has already sailed on this but I'm wishing we had a

> mosize_to_bits() helper function to be explicit about this

> transformation.


Yeah, that might have been a good thing...


r~
Peter Maydell April 29, 2018, 3:27 p.m. UTC | #3
On 29 April 2018 at 15:44, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 04/27/2018 11:04 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:

>>

>> Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:

>>> +        elements = 8 << is_q >> size;

>>

>> That is a brain exercise for operator precedence. Would:

>>

>>      elements = (is_q ? 16 : 8) >> size;

>>

>> be clearer?

>

> I don't think so myself.


Can we at least put in the brackets if we're going to use
the << >> expression?

thanks
-- PMM
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/target/arm/translate-a64.c b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
index b47319d437..c92e052686 100644
--- a/target/arm/translate-a64.c
+++ b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
@@ -7077,13 +7077,26 @@  static void handle_simd_shift_intfp_conv(DisasContext *s, bool is_scalar,
                                          int immh, int immb, int opcode,
                                          int rn, int rd)
 {
-    bool is_double = extract32(immh, 3, 1);
-    int size = is_double ? MO_64 : MO_32;
-    int elements;
+    int size, elements, fracbits;
     int immhb = immh << 3 | immb;
-    int fracbits = (is_double ? 128 : 64) - immhb;
 
-    if (!extract32(immh, 2, 2)) {
+    if (immh & 8) {
+        size = MO_64;
+        if (!is_scalar && !is_q) {
+            unallocated_encoding(s);
+            return;
+        }
+    } else if (immh & 4) {
+        size = MO_32;
+    } else if (immh & 2) {
+        size = MO_16;
+        if (!arm_dc_feature(s, ARM_FEATURE_V8_FP16)) {
+            unallocated_encoding(s);
+            return;
+        }
+    } else {
+        /* immh == 0 would be a failure of the decode logic */
+        g_assert(immh == 1);
         unallocated_encoding(s);
         return;
     }
@@ -7091,20 +7104,14 @@  static void handle_simd_shift_intfp_conv(DisasContext *s, bool is_scalar,
     if (is_scalar) {
         elements = 1;
     } else {
-        elements = is_double ? 2 : is_q ? 4 : 2;
-        if (is_double && !is_q) {
-            unallocated_encoding(s);
-            return;
-        }
+        elements = 8 << is_q >> size;
     }
+    fracbits = (16 << size) - immhb;
 
     if (!fp_access_check(s)) {
         return;
     }
 
-    /* immh == 0 would be a failure of the decode logic */
-    g_assert(immh);
-
     handle_simd_intfp_conv(s, rd, rn, elements, !is_u, fracbits, size);
 }