diff mbox series

[v2,03/11] mmc: mtk-sd: Re-store SDIO IRQs mask at system resume

Message ID 20190908101236.2802-4-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
State New
Headers show
Series mmc: core: PM fixes/improvements for SDIO IRQs | expand

Commit Message

Ulf Hansson Sept. 8, 2019, 10:12 a.m. UTC
In cases when SDIO IRQs have been enabled, runtime suspend is prevented by
the driver. However, this still means msdc_runtime_suspend|resume() gets
called during system suspend/resume, via pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume().

This means during system suspend/resume, the register context of the mtk-sd
device most likely loses its register context, even in cases when SDIO IRQs
have been enabled.

To re-enable the SDIO IRQs during system resume, the mtk-sd driver
currently relies on the mmc core to re-enable the SDIO IRQs when it resumes
the SDIO card, but this isn't the recommended solution. Instead, it's
better to deal with this locally in the mtk-sd driver, so let's do that.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

---
 drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

-- 
2.17.1

Comments

Doug Anderson Sept. 9, 2019, 10:29 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 3:12 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>

> In cases when SDIO IRQs have been enabled, runtime suspend is prevented by

> the driver. However, this still means msdc_runtime_suspend|resume() gets

> called during system suspend/resume, via pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume().

>

> This means during system suspend/resume, the register context of the mtk-sd

> device most likely loses its register context, even in cases when SDIO IRQs

> have been enabled.

>

> To re-enable the SDIO IRQs during system resume, the mtk-sd driver

> currently relies on the mmc core to re-enable the SDIO IRQs when it resumes

> the SDIO card, but this isn't the recommended solution. Instead, it's

> better to deal with this locally in the mtk-sd driver, so let's do that.

>

> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

> ---

>  drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 3 +++

>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

>

> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c

> index 6946bb040a28..ae7688098b7b 100644

> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c

> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c

> @@ -2408,6 +2408,9 @@ static void msdc_save_reg(struct msdc_host *host)

>         } else {

>                 host->save_para.pad_tune = readl(host->base + tune_reg);

>         }

> +

> +       if (sdio_irq_claimed(host->mmc))

> +               __msdc_enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);

>  }

>

>  static void msdc_restore_reg(struct msdc_host *host)


I don't personally have a Mediatek device setup to test this patch on.
If it's super urgent I could try to track down one and try to set it
up, but hopefully it's easier for someone else...

That being said, from code inspection it seems like you should be
adding your code to msdc_restore_reg(), not to msdc_save_reg().  Am I
confused?

-Doug
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
index 6946bb040a28..ae7688098b7b 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
@@ -2408,6 +2408,9 @@  static void msdc_save_reg(struct msdc_host *host)
 	} else {
 		host->save_para.pad_tune = readl(host->base + tune_reg);
 	}
+
+	if (sdio_irq_claimed(host->mmc))
+		__msdc_enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
 }
 
 static void msdc_restore_reg(struct msdc_host *host)