From patchwork Thu Feb 13 06:50:19 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Viresh Kumar X-Patchwork-Id: 24573 Return-Path: X-Original-To: linaro@patches.linaro.org Delivered-To: linaro@patches.linaro.org Received: from mail-vb0-f70.google.com (mail-vb0-f70.google.com [209.85.212.70]) by ip-10-151-82-157.ec2.internal (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E697202E2 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f70.google.com with SMTP id w17sf21740290vbj.5 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:55:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:delivered-to:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:in-reply-to:references :sender:precedence:list-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:mailing-list:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-unsubscribe; bh=KFIFV9efE3vrsilZ2NBTMACd3DRTei88v+SwaxZkbcM=; b=YKn/gfpwJqS6nWOfHv6T9QfRY60qtHnoHCRxm2HuiPKynRpFJFJ+TaSe/1SZ87TQBk d2qnqaVkEjsWSB/K/0bpGdowhn9gP4kObCRPczg9t/ubIyjtqCdIDV+us8F5+xZshRq6 mRmeWkCigQjk/PZmRuoBAjpBv1oYW4AKuiS23STZBEHsSi895NolLUeUpsTNHQ7tl/vT FyvvMNN0z1p6DlSKBqM01p2volM8LfUWbCm3Dyg1Fn0+5DisYHpmBoRHAgOQGxusSKeY dn2Y9YlWzZvDuH2yTW6ODVEkdvPoFULrTNQt6SK/Q+oqq+Re96/gND6KkCxbuLc9Pnaj PCLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+ktiZ0rmV9DCLTVWirZm6THiwQSWj5o5dVWuQyLcZ5m8pQ3wpAM8gLuyHkqmXHk4AGxrG X-Received: by 10.58.120.76 with SMTP id la12mr3548387veb.21.1392274511166; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:55:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: patchwork-forward@linaro.org Received: by 10.140.108.135 with SMTP id j7ls3237592qgf.88.gmail; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:55:11 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.220.106.84 with SMTP id w20mr35022803vco.18.1392274511043; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:55:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com (mail-vb0-f41.google.com [209.85.212.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bj3si336071vcb.139.2014.02.12.22.55.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:55:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.212.41 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org) client-ip=209.85.212.41; Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id g10so8079614vbg.28 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:55:11 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.221.22.71 with SMTP id qv7mr72052vcb.34.1392274510940; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:55:10 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-To: patchwork-forward@linaro.org X-Forwarded-For: patch@linaro.org patchwork-forward@linaro.org Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.220.174.196 with SMTP id u4csp3345vcz; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:55:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.68.193.130 with SMTP id ho2mr17183871pbc.141.1392274510010; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:55:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x3si981002pbk.23.2014.02.12.22.55.09; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:55:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752872AbaBMGwX (ORCPT + 11 others); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 01:52:23 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]:54236 "EHLO mail-we0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752955AbaBMGvG (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 01:51:06 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id p61so7112499wes.17 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:51:05 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.81.196 with SMTP id c4mr143554wjy.57.1392274264993; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:51:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([213.122.173.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 12sm2088203wjm.10.2014.02.12.22.51.01 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:51:04 -0800 (PST) From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, jinchoi@broadcom.com, tianyu.lan@intel.com, sebastian.capella@linaro.org, jhbird.choi@samsung.com, Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH V5 4/7] cpufreq: Implement cpufreq_generic_suspend() Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:20:19 +0530 Message-Id: <7c98f029b36c50addec4840d5dae88725949d386.1392273723.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: list List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org X-Removed-Original-Auth: Dkim didn't pass. X-Original-Sender: viresh.kumar@linaro.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.212.41 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org) smtp.mail=patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org Mailing-list: list patchwork-forward@linaro.org; contact patchwork-forward+owners@linaro.org X-Google-Group-Id: 836684582541 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Multiple platforms need to set CPU to a particular frequency before suspending system. And so they need a common infrastructure which is provided by this patch. Those platforms just need to initialize their ->suspend() pointers with the generic routine. Tested-by: Stephen Warren Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 87a4b96..c13c100 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1579,6 +1579,32 @@ static struct subsys_interface cpufreq_interface = { .remove_dev = cpufreq_remove_dev, }; +/* + * In case platform wants some specific frequency to be configured + * during suspend.. + */ +int cpufreq_generic_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ + int ret; + + if (!policy->suspend_freq) { + pr_err("%s: suspend_freq can't be zero\n", __func__); + return -EINVAL; + } + + pr_debug("%s: Setting suspend-freq: %u\n", __func__, + policy->suspend_freq); + + ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->suspend_freq, + CPUFREQ_RELATION_H); + if (ret) + pr_err("%s: unable to set suspend-freq: %u. err: %d\n", + __func__, policy->suspend_freq, ret); + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_generic_suspend); + /** * cpufreq_suspend() - Suspend CPUFreq governors * diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index 94ed907..325bab0 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ struct cpufreq_policy { unsigned int max; /* in kHz */ unsigned int cur; /* in kHz, only needed if cpufreq * governors are used */ + unsigned int suspend_freq; /* freq to set during suspend */ + unsigned int policy; /* see above */ struct cpufreq_governor *governor; /* see below */ void *governor_data; @@ -299,6 +301,7 @@ cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ void cpufreq_suspend(void); void cpufreq_resume(void); +int cpufreq_generic_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); #else static inline void cpufreq_suspend(void) {} static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {}