Message ID | 20200412212943.4117-4-f4bug@amsat.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [PATCH-for-5.1,1/3] hw/ide/ahci: Use qdev gpio rather than qemu_allocate_irqs() | expand |
diff --git a/hw/openrisc/pic_cpu.c b/hw/openrisc/pic_cpu.c index 36f9350830..4b0c92f842 100644 --- a/hw/openrisc/pic_cpu.c +++ b/hw/openrisc/pic_cpu.c @@ -52,10 +52,9 @@ static void openrisc_pic_cpu_handler(void *opaque, int irq, int level) void cpu_openrisc_pic_init(OpenRISCCPU *cpu) { int i; - qemu_irq *qi; - qi = qemu_allocate_irqs(openrisc_pic_cpu_handler, cpu, NR_IRQS); + qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), openrisc_pic_cpu_handler, NR_IRQS); for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS; i++) { - cpu->env.irq[i] = qi[i]; + cpu->env.irq[i] = qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), i); } }
Switch to using the qdev gpio API which is preferred over qemu_allocate_irqs(). Doing so we also stop leaking the allocated memory. One step to eventually deprecate and remove qemu_allocate_irqs() one day. Patch created mechanically using spatch with this script inspired from commit d6ef883d9d7: @@ typedef qemu_irq; identifier irqs, handler; expression opaque, count, i; @@ - qemu_irq *irqs; ... - irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(handler, opaque, count); + qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(opaque), handler, count); <+... - irqs[i] + qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(opaque), i) ...+> ?- g_free(irqs); Inspired-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> --- hw/openrisc/pic_cpu.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)