diff mbox series

[bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Additional asm tests for the verifier regalloc tracking.

Message ID 20201007222734.93364-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Additional asm tests for the verifier regalloc tracking. | expand

Commit Message

Alexei Starovoitov Oct. 7, 2020, 10:27 p.m. UTC
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add asm tests for register allocator tracking logic implemented in the patches:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201006200955.12350-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com/T/#t

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 159 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko Oct. 7, 2020, 10:50 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:28 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

>

> Add asm tests for register allocator tracking logic implemented in the patches:

> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201006200955.12350-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com/T/#t

>

> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

> ---


I actually read through that assembly :) LGTM.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>


>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++

>  1 file changed, 159 insertions(+)

>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c

>


[...]
Alexei Starovoitov Oct. 7, 2020, 10:57 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:50 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:28 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> >
> > Add asm tests for register allocator tracking logic implemented in the patches:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201006200955.12350-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com/T/#t
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> > ---
>
> I actually read through that assembly :) LGTM.

Thanks. I've added comments to the trickiest case :)

> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
>
> >  .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 159 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c
> >
>
> [...]
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e9b6c6fdecd2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@ 
+{
+	"regalloc 1",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 8),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, 20, 4),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_2, 0, 3),
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_2),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+	"regalloc 2",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 8),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, 24, 4),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_2, 0, 3),
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_2),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=48 size=1",
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+	"regalloc 3",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, 20, 5),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
+	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 3),
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_2),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+	"regalloc 4",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, 22, 5),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
+	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 3),
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_2),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=44 size=8",
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+	"regalloc 5",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 11),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, 20, 7),
+	/* r0 has upper bound that should propagate into r2 */
+	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_2, -8), /* spill r2 */
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), /* clear r0 and r2 */
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10, -8), /* fill r3 */
+	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 2),
+	/* r3 has lower and upper bounds */
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_3),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+	"regalloc 6",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 11),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, 48, 7),
+	/* r0 has upper bound that should propagate into r2 */
+	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_2, -8), /* spill r2 */
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), /* clear r0 and r2 */
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10, -8), /* fill r3 */
+	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 2),
+	/* r3 has lower and upper bounds */
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_3),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=48 size=8",
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},