| Message ID | 20201215102531.16958-1-tklauser@distanz.ch |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [net-next] devlink: use _BITUL() macro instead of BIT() in the UAPI header | expand |
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master): On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:25:31 +0100 you wrote: > The BIT() macro is not available for the UAPI headers. Moreover, it can > be defined differently in user space headers. Thus, replace its usage > with the _BITUL() macro which is already used in other macro definitions > in <linux/devlink.h>. > > Fixes: dc64cc7c6310 ("devlink: Add devlink reload limit option") > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next] devlink: use _BITUL() macro instead of BIT() in the UAPI header https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/75f4d4544db9 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
On 12/15/2020 2:25 AM, Tobias Klauser wrote: > The BIT() macro is not available for the UAPI headers. Moreover, it can > be defined differently in user space headers. Thus, replace its usage > with the _BITUL() macro which is already used in other macro definitions > in <linux/devlink.h>. > > Fixes: dc64cc7c6310 ("devlink: Add devlink reload limit option") > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> Yep, this is correct, and we ran into this exact issue a few months ago with the flash update parameters work. Wonder how difficult it would be to get something like checkpatch.pl or another utility to complain about using BIT() macros in UAPI..? Unfortunately this is easy to overlook because the kernel side code almost always has BIT defined, so you won't get a compilation failure until you try to use the uapi header in a userspace program. Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> > --- > include/uapi/linux/devlink.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h > index 5203f54a2be1..cf89c318f2ac 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h > @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ enum devlink_reload_limit { > DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_MAX = __DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_MAX - 1 > }; > > -#define DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMITS_VALID_MASK (BIT(__DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_MAX) - 1) > +#define DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMITS_VALID_MASK (_BITUL(__DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_MAX) - 1) > > enum devlink_attr { > /* don't change the order or add anything between, this is ABI! */ >
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h index 5203f54a2be1..cf89c318f2ac 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ enum devlink_reload_limit { DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_MAX = __DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_MAX - 1 }; -#define DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMITS_VALID_MASK (BIT(__DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_MAX) - 1) +#define DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMITS_VALID_MASK (_BITUL(__DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_MAX) - 1) enum devlink_attr { /* don't change the order or add anything between, this is ABI! */
The BIT() macro is not available for the UAPI headers. Moreover, it can be defined differently in user space headers. Thus, replace its usage with the _BITUL() macro which is already used in other macro definitions in <linux/devlink.h>. Fixes: dc64cc7c6310 ("devlink: Add devlink reload limit option") Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> --- include/uapi/linux/devlink.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)