diff mbox

[5/8] ARM: l2x0: move DT parsing for cache props

Message ID 1409659354-23553-6-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Linus Walleij Sept. 2, 2014, 12:02 p.m. UTC
The current diagnostic prints in the l2x0 driver will print
warnings like this if the AUX register i modified by the
mask and set words passed to the l2x0_init() function:

L2C: platform modifies aux control register: 0x02020fff -> 0x02730fff
L2C: DT/platform modifies aux control register: 0x02020fff -> 0x02730fff
L2C-220 cache controller enabled, 8 ways, 128 kB
L2C-220: CACHE_ID 0x41000486, AUX_CTRL 0x06730fff

However this is not printed properly if the DT modifies
the AUX register, even if the debug print says so. As the
call to ->of_parse for the cache variant is placed after this
print.

Move the ->of_parse call above the print so we get proper
diagnostics.

Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Russell King - ARM Linux Sept. 2, 2014, 12:43 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:02:31PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The current diagnostic prints in the l2x0 driver will print
> warnings like this if the AUX register i modified by the
> mask and set words passed to the l2x0_init() function:
> 
> L2C: platform modifies aux control register: 0x02020fff -> 0x02730fff
> L2C: DT/platform modifies aux control register: 0x02020fff -> 0x02730fff

Notice that there are two here.

The first means that the platform passed values which resulted in an
actual modification to the control register.  This happens in
l2x0_of_init() to identify values of aux_mask/aux_val which result
in manipulation of the control register by hard-coded platform values.

The second means that the platform _or_ the DT resulted in an actual
modification of the control register.  This happens in __l2c_init(),
after the DT has been parsed, or after the non-DT code paths to identify
any remaining modifications.

I don't see any point to this patch.
Linus Walleij Sept. 5, 2014, 11:10 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> I don't see any point to this patch.

Neither do I after looking closer. Hm. I must have been confusing
myself, I'm dropping this crap.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
index 5f2c988a06ac..363c27bee3f6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
@@ -1518,6 +1518,11 @@  int __init l2x0_of_init(u32 aux_val, u32 aux_mask)
 	    of_property_read_bool(np, "arm,io-coherent"))
 		data = &of_l2c310_coherent_data;
 
+	/* L2 configuration can only be changed if the cache is disabled */
+	if (!(readl_relaxed(l2x0_base + L2X0_CTRL) & L2X0_CTRL_EN))
+		if (data->of_parse)
+			data->of_parse(np, &aux_val, &aux_mask);
+
 	old_aux = readl_relaxed(l2x0_base + L2X0_AUX_CTRL);
 	if (old_aux != ((old_aux & aux_mask) | aux_val)) {
 		pr_warn("L2C: platform modifies aux control register: 0x%08x -> 0x%08x\n",
@@ -1530,11 +1535,6 @@  int __init l2x0_of_init(u32 aux_val, u32 aux_mask)
 	if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-unified"))
 		pr_err("L2C: device tree omits to specify unified cache\n");
 
-	/* L2 configuration can only be changed if the cache is disabled */
-	if (!(readl_relaxed(l2x0_base + L2X0_CTRL) & L2X0_CTRL_EN))
-		if (data->of_parse)
-			data->of_parse(np, &aux_val, &aux_mask);
-
 	if (cache_id_part_number_from_dt)
 		cache_id = cache_id_part_number_from_dt;
 	else