| Message ID | 20210216085326.178912-1-ducheng2@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v3] staging: fix coding style in driver/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c | expand |
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 04:53:26PM +0800, Du Cheng wrote: > align * in block comments on each line > > changes v3: > - add SUBSYSTEM in subject line > - add explanation to past version of this patch > > changes v2: > - move closing of comment to the same line > > changes v1: > - align * in block comments These "changes" should all go below the --- line, right? And the subject shoudl be a bit more specific, look at how other commits are done for this driver. Something like: Subject: staging: qlge: fix comment style in qlge_main.c matches much better, and conveys what is actually happening here, right? v4 please? thanks, greg k-h
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:20:22AM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > On 16.02.2021 09:53, Du Cheng wrote: > > align * in block comments on each line > > > > changes v3: > > - add SUBSYSTEM in subject line > > - add explanation to past version of this patch > > > > changes v2: > > - move closing of comment to the same line > > > > changes v1: > > - align * in block comments > > > > Signed-off-by: Du Cheng <ducheng2@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c > > index 5516be3af898..2682a0e474bd 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c > > @@ -3815,8 +3815,7 @@ static int qlge_adapter_down(struct qlge_adapter *qdev) > > > > qlge_tx_ring_clean(qdev); > > > > - /* Call netif_napi_del() from common point. > > - */ > > + /* Call netif_napi_del() from common point. */ > > for (i = 0; i < qdev->rss_ring_count; i++) > > netif_napi_del(&qdev->rx_ring[i].napi); > > > > > Typically such trivial patches aren't much appreciated for staging drivers. > In the case here I have doubts that the comment as such provides any benefit. Huh? What? I think you have mixed up staging and non-staging. In staging we apply this sort of patch all the time. This patch improves the code. It's the only warning of this type in the file. We will apply it. If you start down the path of worrying about "is this worth doing" then you end up wasting maintainer time and developer time. That's like an ambiguous thing, right? We try to avoid ambiguity and be mechanical and predictable. We won't apply patches which fix checkpatch warnings if the result is worse looking code. This might seem like an ambiguous judgement call to newbies but it is actually 100% predictable to oldbies. :P Anyway the v2 v3 stuff is supposed to be below the --- cut off so please fix that and resend. regards, dan carpenter
diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c index 5516be3af898..2682a0e474bd 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c +++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c @@ -3815,8 +3815,7 @@ static int qlge_adapter_down(struct qlge_adapter *qdev) qlge_tx_ring_clean(qdev); - /* Call netif_napi_del() from common point. - */ + /* Call netif_napi_del() from common point. */ for (i = 0; i < qdev->rss_ring_count; i++) netif_napi_del(&qdev->rx_ring[i].napi);
align * in block comments on each line changes v3: - add SUBSYSTEM in subject line - add explanation to past version of this patch changes v2: - move closing of comment to the same line changes v1: - align * in block comments Signed-off-by: Du Cheng <ducheng2@gmail.com> --- drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)