diff mbox

[V4,1/3] ARM: extract_arm_insn function need to read instrs correctly in be8 case

Message ID 1414379434-5217-2-git-send-email-victor.kamensky@linaro.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

vkamensky Oct. 27, 2014, 3:10 a.m. UTC 
extract_arm_insn function needs to read instructions in
gdbarch_byte_order_for_code byte order, because in case armv7b,
even data is big endian, instructions are still little endian.
Currently function uses gdbarch_byte_order which would be
big endian in armv7b case.

Because of this issue pretty much all gdb.reverse/ tests are
failing with 'Process record does not support instruction' message.

Fix is to change gdbarch_byte_order to gdbarch_byte_order_for_code,
when passed to extract_unsigned_integer that reads instruction.

gdb/ChangeLog:

2014-10-21  Victor Kamensky  <victor.kamensky@linaro.org>

	* arm-tdep.c (extract_arm_insn): Use
	gdbarch_byte_order_for_code to read arm instruction.
---
 gdb/arm-tdep.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
index e2559ec..e7a1ec5 100644
--- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
@@ -13860,7 +13860,7 @@  extract_arm_insn (insn_decode_record *insn_record, uint32_t insn_size)
     return 1;
   insn_record->arm_insn = (uint32_t) extract_unsigned_integer (&buf[0],
                            insn_size, 
-                           gdbarch_byte_order (insn_record->gdbarch));
+			   gdbarch_byte_order_for_code (insn_record->gdbarch));
   return 0;
 }