@@ -2442,23 +2442,12 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data)
if (ret)
goto err_boost_unreg;
- if (!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_STICKY)) {
- int i;
- ret = -ENODEV;
-
- /* check for at least one working CPU */
- for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++)
- if (cpu_possible(i) && per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, i)) {
- ret = 0;
- break;
- }
-
+ if (!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_STICKY) &&
+ list_empty(&cpufreq_policy_list)) {
/* if all ->init() calls failed, unregister */
- if (ret) {
- pr_debug("no CPU initialized for driver %s\n",
- driver_data->name);
- goto err_if_unreg;
- }
+ pr_debug("%s: No CPU initialized for driver %s\n", __func__,
+ driver_data->name);
+ goto err_if_unreg;
}
register_hotcpu_notifier(&cpufreq_cpu_notifier);
CPUFREQ_STICKY flag is set by drivers which don't want to get unregistered even if cpufreq-core isn't able to initialize policy for any CPU. When this flag isn't set, we try to unregister the driver. To find out which CPUs are registered and which are not, we try to check per_cpu cpufreq_cpu_data for all CPUs. Because we have a list of valid policies available now, we better check if the list is empty or not instead of the 'for' loop. That will be much more efficient. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 21 +++++---------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)