| Message ID | 1619403878-28330-3-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Three minor fixes w.r.t suspend/resume | expand |
Hi Can Guo, >diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c >index 7ab6b12..090b654 100644 >--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c >+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c >@@ -9058,11 +9058,12 @@ int ufshcd_system_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba) > if (!hba->is_powered) > return 0; > >+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hba->rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work); >+ > if ((ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_dev_pwr_mode(hba->spm_lvl) == > hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) && > (ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_link_pwr_state(hba->spm_lvl) == >- hba->uic_link_state) && >- !hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable) I think it should not be removed. It prevents power drain when runtime suspend and system suspend have same power mode. Thanks, Daejun
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c index 7ab6b12..090b654 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -9058,11 +9058,12 @@ int ufshcd_system_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba) if (!hba->is_powered) return 0; + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hba->rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work); + if ((ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_dev_pwr_mode(hba->spm_lvl) == hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) && (ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_link_pwr_state(hba->spm_lvl) == - hba->uic_link_state) && - !hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable) + hba->uic_link_state)) goto out; if (pm_runtime_suspended(hba->dev)) {
During ufs system suspend, leaving rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work running or pending is risky, because concurrency may happen btw system suspend/resume and runtime resume routine. Fix it by cancelling rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work synchronously during system suspend. Fixes: 1d53864c3617f5235f891ca0fbe9347c4cd35d46 ("scsi: ufs: Fix possible power drain during system suspend") Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)