[GIT,PULL] clockevents for 4.1

Message ID 5519AEB2.8050306@linaro.org
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

http://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git clockevents/4.1

Message

Daniel Lezcano March 30, 2015, 8:14 p.m.
Hi Thomas, Ingo,

this pull request contains the following changes for 4.1:

  - Made IO endian agnostic for at91 and dw apb timers (Ben Dooks)

  - Maintained tegra endianess (Dmitry Osipenko)

  - Enabled the sun4i / sun5i timer for sched_clock, all others winner 
boards have the arch arm timer which is more accurate (Hans de Goede)

  - Renamed the arch arm timer function name to reflect better its 
purpose (Laurent Pinchart)

  - Cleaned up the sun5i timer code, replaced the setup_irq by the 
request_irq function and handled the parent clock frequency change with 
the frequency notifiers (Maxime Ripard)

  - Fixed features declaration for the efm32 timer (Viresh Kumar)

Thanks !

   -- Daniel

The following changes since commit 2557d215a36d18c8bbaa35f65749349ac603360b:

   Merge branch 'timers/urgent' into timers/core, to pick up fixes 
before applying new changes (2015-03-17 11:11:24 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:

   http://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git clockevents/4.1

for you to fetch changes up to 0bb4ef6f7c56cdf606a5e501cf1597f40c9028eb

   clocksource: efm32: Use CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC for defining features 
(2015-03-30 15:27:24 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Dooks (2):
       clocksource: at91: Make IO endian agnostic
       clocksource: dw_apb_timer_of: Make IO endian agnostic

Dmitry Osipenko (1):
       clocksource: tegra: Maintain CPU endianness

Hans de Goede (1):
       clocksource: sun4i-timer: Only register a sched_clock on sun4i 
and sun5i

Laurent Pinchart (1):
       clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed to reflect 
behaviour

Maxime Ripard (5):
       clocksource: sun5i: Switch to request_irq
       clocksource: sun5i: Use of_io_request_and_map
       clocksource: sun5i: Remove sched_clock
       clocksource: sun5i: Refactor the current code
       clocksource: sun5i: Add clock notifiers

Viresh Kumar (1):
       clocksource: efm32: Use CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC for defining features

  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c  |  13 +++++-----
  drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer_of.c |   2 +-
  drivers/clocksource/sun4i_timer.c     |  10 +++++++-
  drivers/clocksource/tegra20_timer.c   |   4 ++--
  drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c      |   2 +-
  drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-pit.c |   4 ++--
  drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c     | 302 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------------------------------
  7 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)

Comments

Daniel Lezcano March 31, 2015, 9:37 a.m. | #1
On 03/31/2015 09:17 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Thomas, Ingo,
>>
>> this pull request contains the following changes for 4.1:
>>
>>   - Made IO endian agnostic for at91 and dw apb timers (Ben Dooks)
>>
>>   - Maintained tegra endianess (Dmitry Osipenko)
>>
>>   - Enabled the sun4i / sun5i timer for sched_clock, all others winner boards
>> have the arch arm timer which is more accurate (Hans de Goede)
>>
>>   - Renamed the arch arm timer function name to reflect better its purpose
>> (Laurent Pinchart)
>>
>>   - Cleaned up the sun5i timer code, replaced the setup_irq by the
>> request_irq function and handled the parent clock frequency change with the
>> frequency notifiers (Maxime Ripard)
>>
>>   - Fixed features declaration for the efm32 timer (Viresh Kumar)
>>
>> Thanks !
>
> So I had some comments about one of the patches, and fixes to
> changelogs, so I've applied all but the sun4/5i patches from email to
> move things forward.

The subsystem prefix is now 'clocksource/drivers/<name>' ?

> The sun4/5i patches conflicted - mind reposting those merged on top of
> the latest tip:timers:core tree?

Yes, sure. No problem.

Thanks !

   -- Daniel