diff mbox

[3/6] clocksource: bcm2835: Migrate to new 'set-state' interface

Message ID b0bf70d911dffe170b0d2b2b3e680bb445c15fc4.1433768426.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Viresh Kumar June 8, 2015, 1:40 p.m. UTC
Migrate bcm2835 driver to the new 'set-state' interface provided by
the clockevents core, the earlier 'set-mode' interface is marked
obsolete now.

This also enables us to implement callbacks for new states of clockevent
devices, for example: ONESHOT_STOPPED.

Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clocksource/bcm2835_timer.c | 17 ++++-------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Daniel Lezcano June 11, 2015, 3:25 p.m. UTC | #1
On 06/08/2015 03:40 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Migrate bcm2835 driver to the new 'set-state' interface provided by
> the clockevents core, the earlier 'set-mode' interface is marked
> obsolete now.
>
> This also enables us to implement callbacks for new states of clockevent
> devices, for example: ONESHOT_STOPPED.

Please mention in the log you removed the RESUME because it does nothing 
and the core code will just ignore it.

> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

> ---
>   drivers/clocksource/bcm2835_timer.c | 17 ++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/bcm2835_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/bcm2835_timer.c
> index 26ed331b1aad..b59b8e1ba503 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/bcm2835_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/bcm2835_timer.c
> @@ -54,19 +54,9 @@ static u64 notrace bcm2835_sched_read(void)
>   	return readl_relaxed(system_clock);
>   }
>
> -static void bcm2835_time_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
> -	struct clock_event_device *evt_dev)
> +static int bcm2835_time_noop(struct clock_event_device *evt)
>   {
> -	switch (mode) {
> -	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
> -	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED:
> -	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN:
> -	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_RESUME:
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		WARN(1, "%s: unhandled event mode %d\n", __func__, mode);
> -		break;
> -	}
> +	return 0;
>   }
>
>   static int bcm2835_time_set_next_event(unsigned long event,
> @@ -129,7 +119,8 @@ static void __init bcm2835_timer_init(struct device_node *node)
>   	timer->evt.name = node->name;
>   	timer->evt.rating = 300;
>   	timer->evt.features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT;
> -	timer->evt.set_mode = bcm2835_time_set_mode;
> +	timer->evt.set_state_shutdown = bcm2835_time_noop;
> +	timer->evt.set_state_oneshot = bcm2835_time_noop;

The patch is ok but there is an inconsistency on how are handled the 
different callbacks. tick_resume can be omitted but not state_shutdown 
and state_oneshot forcing the drivers to define empty functions.

>   	timer->evt.set_next_event = bcm2835_time_set_next_event;
>   	timer->evt.cpumask = cpumask_of(0);
>   	timer->act.name = node->name;
Viresh Kumar June 11, 2015, 4 p.m. UTC | #2
On 11-06-15, 17:25, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Please mention in the log you removed the RESUME because it does
> nothing and the core code will just ignore it.

Okay.

> The patch is ok but there is an inconsistency on how are handled the
> different callbacks. tick_resume can be omitted but not
> state_shutdown and state_oneshot forcing the drivers to define empty
> functions.

It was done because they are thought to be compulsory, but even I
am not sure if we should make all callbacks as optional.
Daniel Lezcano June 11, 2015, 4:13 p.m. UTC | #3
On 06/11/2015 06:00 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11-06-15, 17:25, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Please mention in the log you removed the RESUME because it does
>> nothing and the core code will just ignore it.
>
> Okay.
>
>> The patch is ok but there is an inconsistency on how are handled the
>> different callbacks. tick_resume can be omitted but not
>> state_shutdown and state_oneshot forcing the drivers to define empty
>> functions.
>
> It was done because they are thought to be compulsory, but even I
> am not sure if we should make all callbacks as optional.

Yes, I think it would make sense to ignore NULL callback in 
__clockevents_set_state, otherwise we will end up to fill the different 
drivers with duplicated noop functions.
Viresh Kumar June 11, 2015, 4:27 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Thomas,

On 11-06-15, 18:13, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Yes, I think it would make sense to ignore NULL callback in
> __clockevents_set_state, otherwise we will end up to fill the
> different drivers with duplicated noop functions.

Do you suggest the same ?

Thanks.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/bcm2835_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/bcm2835_timer.c
index 26ed331b1aad..b59b8e1ba503 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/bcm2835_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/bcm2835_timer.c
@@ -54,19 +54,9 @@  static u64 notrace bcm2835_sched_read(void)
 	return readl_relaxed(system_clock);
 }
 
-static void bcm2835_time_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
-	struct clock_event_device *evt_dev)
+static int bcm2835_time_noop(struct clock_event_device *evt)
 {
-	switch (mode) {
-	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
-	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED:
-	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN:
-	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_RESUME:
-		break;
-	default:
-		WARN(1, "%s: unhandled event mode %d\n", __func__, mode);
-		break;
-	}
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int bcm2835_time_set_next_event(unsigned long event,
@@ -129,7 +119,8 @@  static void __init bcm2835_timer_init(struct device_node *node)
 	timer->evt.name = node->name;
 	timer->evt.rating = 300;
 	timer->evt.features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT;
-	timer->evt.set_mode = bcm2835_time_set_mode;
+	timer->evt.set_state_shutdown = bcm2835_time_noop;
+	timer->evt.set_state_oneshot = bcm2835_time_noop;
 	timer->evt.set_next_event = bcm2835_time_set_next_event;
 	timer->evt.cpumask = cpumask_of(0);
 	timer->act.name = node->name;