diff mbox series

virtio_net: reduce raw_smp_processor_id() calling in virtnet_xdp_get_sq

Message ID 1629966095-16341-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series virtio_net: reduce raw_smp_processor_id() calling in virtnet_xdp_get_sq | expand

Commit Message

Li RongQing Aug. 26, 2021, 8:21 a.m. UTC
smp_processor_id()/raw* will be called once each when not
more queues in virtnet_xdp_get_sq() which is called in
non-preemptible context, so it's safe to call the function
smp_processor_id() once.

Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Michael S. Tsirkin Aug. 30, 2021, 9:10 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:21:35PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
> smp_processor_id()/raw* will be called once each when not

> more queues in virtnet_xdp_get_sq() which is called in

> non-preemptible context, so it's safe to call the function

> smp_processor_id() once.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>


commit log should probably explain why it's a good idea
to replace raw_smp_processor_id with smp_processor_id
in the case of curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids.

> ---

>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 7 ++++---

>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c

> index 2e42210a6503..2a7b368c1da2 100644

> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c

> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c

> @@ -528,19 +528,20 @@ static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,

>   * functions to perfectly solve these three problems at the same time.

>   */

>  #define virtnet_xdp_get_sq(vi) ({                                       \

> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();                                   \

>  	struct netdev_queue *txq;                                       \

>  	typeof(vi) v = (vi);                                            \

>  	unsigned int qp;                                                \

>  									\

>  	if (v->curr_queue_pairs > nr_cpu_ids) {                         \

>  		qp = v->curr_queue_pairs - v->xdp_queue_pairs;          \

> -		qp += smp_processor_id();                               \

> +		qp += cpu;                                              \

>  		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(v->dev, qp);                  \

>  		__netif_tx_acquire(txq);                                \

>  	} else {                                                        \

> -		qp = smp_processor_id() % v->curr_queue_pairs;          \

> +		qp = cpu % v->curr_queue_pairs;                         \

>  		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(v->dev, qp);                  \

> -		__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());           \

> +		__netif_tx_lock(txq, cpu);                              \

>  	}                                                               \

>  	v->sq + qp;                                                     \

>  })

> -- 

> 2.33.0.69.gc420321.dirty

> 

>
Michael S. Tsirkin Aug. 31, 2021, 2:33 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 02:09:36AM +0000, Li,Rongqing wrote:
> > -----邮件原件-----

> > 发件人: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

> > 发送时间: 2021年8月31日 5:10

> > 收件人: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>

> > 抄送: netdev@vger.kernel.org; bpf@vger.kernel.org;

> > virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org

> > 主题: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: reduce raw_smp_processor_id() calling in

> > virtnet_xdp_get_sq

> > 

> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:21:35PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:

> > > smp_processor_id()/raw* will be called once each when not more queues

> > > in virtnet_xdp_get_sq() which is called in non-preemptible context, so

> > > it's safe to call the function

> > > smp_processor_id() once.

> > >

> > > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>

> > 

> > commit log should probably explain why it's a good idea to replace

> > raw_smp_processor_id with smp_processor_id in the case of curr_queue_pairs

> > <= nr_cpu_ids.

> > 

> 

> 

> I change it as below, is it ok?

> 

>     virtio_net: reduce raw_smp_processor_id() calling in virtnet_xdp_get_sq


shorter:

virtio_net: s/raw_smp_processor_id/smp_processor_id/ in virtnet_xdp_get_sq


> 

>     smp_processor_id() and raw_smp_processor_id() are called once

>     each in virtnet_xdp_get_sq(), when curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids,

>     should be merged


I'd just drop this part.

> 

>     virtnet_xdp_get_sq() is called in non-preemptible context, so

>     it's safe to call the function smp_processor_id(), and keep

>     smp_processor_id(), and remove the calling of raw_smp_processor_id(),

>     avoid the wrong use virtnet_xdp_get_sq to preemptible context

>     in the future


s/avoid.*/this way we'll get a warning if this is ever called in a preemptible context/


> 

> -Li
Li RongQing Sept. 3, 2021, 4 a.m. UTC | #3
> -----邮件原件-----

> 发件人: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

> 发送时间: 2021年8月31日 22:34

> 收件人: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>

> 抄送: netdev@vger.kernel.org; bpf@vger.kernel.org;

> virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org

> 主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH] virtio_net: reduce raw_smp_processor_id() calling in

> virtnet_xdp_get_sq

> 

> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 02:09:36AM +0000, Li,Rongqing wrote:

> > > -----邮件原件-----

> > > 发件人: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

> > > 发送时间: 2021年8月31日 5:10

> > > 收件人: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>

> > > 抄送: netdev@vger.kernel.org; bpf@vger.kernel.org;

> > > virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org

> > > 主题: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: reduce raw_smp_processor_id() calling in

> > > virtnet_xdp_get_sq

> > >

> > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:21:35PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:

> > > > smp_processor_id()/raw* will be called once each when not more

> > > > queues in virtnet_xdp_get_sq() which is called in non-preemptible

> > > > context, so it's safe to call the function

> > > > smp_processor_id() once.

> > > >

> > > > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>

> > >

> > > commit log should probably explain why it's a good idea to replace

> > > raw_smp_processor_id with smp_processor_id in the case of

> > > curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids.

> > >

> >

> >

> > I change it as below, is it ok?

> >

> >     virtio_net: reduce raw_smp_processor_id() calling in

> > virtnet_xdp_get_sq

> 

> shorter:

> 

> virtio_net: s/raw_smp_processor_id/smp_processor_id/ in virtnet_xdp_get_sq

> 

> 

> >

> >     smp_processor_id() and raw_smp_processor_id() are called once

> >     each in virtnet_xdp_get_sq(), when curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids,

> >     should be merged

> 

> I'd just drop this part.

> 

> >

> >     virtnet_xdp_get_sq() is called in non-preemptible context, so

> >     it's safe to call the function smp_processor_id(), and keep

> >     smp_processor_id(), and remove the calling of raw_smp_processor_id(),

> >     avoid the wrong use virtnet_xdp_get_sq to preemptible context

> >     in the future

> 

> s/avoid.*/this way we'll get a warning if this is ever called in a preemptible

> context/

> 



Thanks, should I resend it

-Li


> 

> >

> > -Li
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 2e42210a6503..2a7b368c1da2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -528,19 +528,20 @@  static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
  * functions to perfectly solve these three problems at the same time.
  */
 #define virtnet_xdp_get_sq(vi) ({                                       \
+	int cpu = smp_processor_id();                                   \
 	struct netdev_queue *txq;                                       \
 	typeof(vi) v = (vi);                                            \
 	unsigned int qp;                                                \
 									\
 	if (v->curr_queue_pairs > nr_cpu_ids) {                         \
 		qp = v->curr_queue_pairs - v->xdp_queue_pairs;          \
-		qp += smp_processor_id();                               \
+		qp += cpu;                                              \
 		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(v->dev, qp);                  \
 		__netif_tx_acquire(txq);                                \
 	} else {                                                        \
-		qp = smp_processor_id() % v->curr_queue_pairs;          \
+		qp = cpu % v->curr_queue_pairs;                         \
 		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(v->dev, qp);                  \
-		__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());           \
+		__netif_tx_lock(txq, cpu);                              \
 	}                                                               \
 	v->sq + qp;                                                     \
 })