| Message ID | 1445831597-5680-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 6e4a0f2b5c56af6be43b546df16b1ece7df537d8 |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:53:17PM +0900, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > The comparison between TASK_SIZE_64 and MODULES_VADDR does not > make any sense on arm64, it is simply something that has been > carried over from the ARM port which arm64 is based on. So drop it. > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Applied. Thanks. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h index 11ccf6c09533..37f3538a2924 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h @@ -70,10 +70,6 @@ #define TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE (PAGE_ALIGN(TASK_SIZE / 4)) -#if TASK_SIZE_64 > MODULES_VADDR -#error Top of 64-bit user space clashes with start of module space -#endif - /* * Physical vs virtual RAM address space conversion. These are * private definitions which should NOT be used outside memory.h
The comparison between TASK_SIZE_64 and MODULES_VADDR does not make any sense on arm64, it is simply something that has been carried over from the ARM port which arm64 is based on. So drop it. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel