Message ID | 20220624210623.6383-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | e95a1cd2cfe722dc8434db6de33958035853aa05 |
Headers | show |
Series | [RESEND,v2] spi: dw: Add deferred DMA-channels setup support | expand |
On Sat, 25 Jun 2022 00:06:23 +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > Currently if the source DMA device isn't ready to provide the channels > capable of the SPI DMA transfers, the DW SSI controller will be registered > with no DMA support. It isn't right since all what the driver needs to do > is to postpone the probe procedure until the DMA device is ready. Let's > fix that in the framework of the DWC SSI generic DMA implementation. First > we need to use the dma_request_chan() method instead of the > dma_request_slave_channel() function, because the later one is deprecated > and most importantly doesn't return the failure cause but the > NULL-pointer. Second we need to stop the DW SSI controller probe procedure > if the -EPROBE_DEFER error is returned on the DMA initialization. The > procedure will resume later when the channels are ready to be requested. > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] spi: dw: Add deferred DMA-channels setup support commit: e95a1cd2cfe722dc8434db6de33958035853aa05 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c index ecea471ff42c..911ea9bddbee 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c @@ -942,7 +942,9 @@ int dw_spi_add_host(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws) if (dws->dma_ops && dws->dma_ops->dma_init) { ret = dws->dma_ops->dma_init(dev, dws); - if (ret) { + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { + goto err_free_irq; + } else if (ret) { dev_warn(dev, "DMA init failed\n"); } else { master->can_dma = dws->dma_ops->can_dma; @@ -963,6 +965,7 @@ int dw_spi_add_host(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws) if (dws->dma_ops && dws->dma_ops->dma_exit) dws->dma_ops->dma_exit(dws); dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 0); +err_free_irq: free_irq(dws->irq, master); err_free_master: spi_controller_put(master); diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-dma.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-dma.c index 63e5260100ec..1322b8cce5b7 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-dma.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-dma.c @@ -139,15 +139,20 @@ static int dw_spi_dma_init_mfld(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws) static int dw_spi_dma_init_generic(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws) { - dws->rxchan = dma_request_slave_channel(dev, "rx"); - if (!dws->rxchan) - return -ENODEV; + int ret; - dws->txchan = dma_request_slave_channel(dev, "tx"); - if (!dws->txchan) { - dma_release_channel(dws->rxchan); + dws->rxchan = dma_request_chan(dev, "rx"); + if (IS_ERR(dws->rxchan)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(dws->rxchan); dws->rxchan = NULL; - return -ENODEV; + goto err_exit; + } + + dws->txchan = dma_request_chan(dev, "tx"); + if (IS_ERR(dws->txchan)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(dws->txchan); + dws->txchan = NULL; + goto free_rxchan; } dws->master->dma_rx = dws->rxchan; @@ -160,6 +165,12 @@ static int dw_spi_dma_init_generic(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws) dw_spi_dma_sg_burst_init(dws); return 0; + +free_rxchan: + dma_release_channel(dws->rxchan); + dws->rxchan = NULL; +err_exit: + return ret; } static void dw_spi_dma_exit(struct dw_spi *dws)