diff mbox series

[03/12] lpfc: Resolve miscellaneous variable set but not used compiler warnings

Message ID 20230109233317.54737-4-justintee8345@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series lpfc: Update lpfc to revision 14.2.0.10 | expand

Commit Message

Justin Tee Jan. 9, 2023, 11:33 p.m. UTC
The local variables called curr_data are incremented, but not actually used
for anything so they are removed.

The return value of lpfc_sli4_poll_eq is not used anywhere and is not
called outside of lpfc_sli.c.  Thus, its declaration is removed from
lpfc_crtn.h  Also, lpfc_sli4_poll_eq's path argument is not used in the
routine so it is removed along with corresponding macros.

Signed-off-by: Justin Tee <justin.tee@broadcom.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h      |  2 --
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_crtn.h |  1 -
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c |  6 ++--
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c  | 62 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
index 9ad233b40a9e..1095595ca3a2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
@@ -1592,8 +1592,6 @@  struct lpfc_hba {
 	struct timer_list cpuhp_poll_timer;
 	struct list_head poll_list;	/* slowpath eq polling list */
 #define LPFC_POLL_HB	1		/* slowpath heartbeat */
-#define LPFC_POLL_FASTPATH	0	/* called from fastpath */
-#define LPFC_POLL_SLOWPATH	1	/* called from slowpath */
 
 	char os_host_name[MAXHOSTNAMELEN];
 
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_crtn.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_crtn.h
index 8928f016d09e..6f63e0acf9dd 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_crtn.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_crtn.h
@@ -253,7 +253,6 @@  int lpfc_read_object(struct lpfc_hba *phba, char *s, uint32_t *datap,
 		     uint32_t len);
 
 void lpfc_sli4_cleanup_poll_list(struct lpfc_hba *phba);
-int lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(struct lpfc_queue *q, uint8_t path);
 void lpfc_sli4_poll_hbtimer(struct timer_list *t);
 void lpfc_sli4_start_polling(struct lpfc_queue *q);
 void lpfc_sli4_stop_polling(struct lpfc_queue *q);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
index 7a1563564df7..9b6580eb7ed6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
@@ -1689,7 +1689,7 @@  lpfc_bg_setup_bpl_prot(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc,
 	struct lpfc_pde6 *pde6 = NULL;
 	struct lpfc_pde7 *pde7 = NULL;
 	dma_addr_t dataphysaddr, protphysaddr;
-	unsigned short curr_data = 0, curr_prot = 0;
+	unsigned short curr_prot = 0;
 	unsigned int split_offset;
 	unsigned int protgroup_len, protgroup_offset = 0, protgroup_remainder;
 	unsigned int protgrp_blks, protgrp_bytes;
@@ -1858,7 +1858,6 @@  lpfc_bg_setup_bpl_prot(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc,
 			bpl->tus.w = le32_to_cpu(bpl->tus.w);
 
 			num_bde++;
-			curr_data++;
 
 			if (split_offset)
 				break;
@@ -2119,7 +2118,7 @@  lpfc_bg_setup_sgl_prot(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc,
 	struct scatterlist *sgpe = NULL; /* s/g prot entry */
 	struct sli4_sge_diseed *diseed = NULL;
 	dma_addr_t dataphysaddr, protphysaddr;
-	unsigned short curr_data = 0, curr_prot = 0;
+	unsigned short curr_prot = 0;
 	unsigned int split_offset;
 	unsigned int protgroup_len, protgroup_offset = 0, protgroup_remainder;
 	unsigned int protgrp_blks, protgrp_bytes;
@@ -2364,7 +2363,6 @@  lpfc_bg_setup_sgl_prot(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc,
 				dma_offset += dma_len;
 
 				num_sge++;
-				curr_data++;
 
 				if (split_offset) {
 					sgl++;
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index 182aaae60386..c21187c93a5f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -11270,6 +11270,30 @@  lpfc_sli4_calc_ring(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *piocb)
 	}
 }
 
+inline void lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(struct lpfc_queue *eq)
+{
+	struct lpfc_hba *phba = eq->phba;
+
+	/*
+	 * Unlocking an irq is one of the entry point to check
+	 * for re-schedule, but we are good for io submission
+	 * path as midlayer does a get_cpu to glue us in. Flush
+	 * out the invalidate queue so we can see the updated
+	 * value for flag.
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
+
+	if (READ_ONCE(eq->mode) == LPFC_EQ_POLL)
+		/* We will not likely get the completion for the caller
+		 * during this iteration but i guess that's fine.
+		 * Future io's coming on this eq should be able to
+		 * pick it up.  As for the case of single io's, they
+		 * will be handled through a sched from polling timer
+		 * function which is currently triggered every 1msec.
+		 */
+		lpfc_sli4_process_eq(phba, eq, LPFC_QUEUE_NOARM);
+}
+
 /**
  * lpfc_sli_issue_iocb - Wrapper function for __lpfc_sli_issue_iocb
  * @phba: Pointer to HBA context object.
@@ -11309,7 +11333,7 @@  lpfc_sli_issue_iocb(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint32_t ring_number,
 		rc = __lpfc_sli_issue_iocb(phba, ring_number, piocb, flag);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pring->ring_lock, iflags);
 
-		lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(eq, LPFC_POLL_FASTPATH);
+		lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(eq);
 	} else {
 		/* For now, SLI2/3 will still use hbalock */
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
@@ -15625,12 +15649,11 @@  void lpfc_sli4_poll_hbtimer(struct timer_list *t)
 {
 	struct lpfc_hba *phba = from_timer(phba, t, cpuhp_poll_timer);
 	struct lpfc_queue *eq;
-	int i = 0;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(eq, &phba->poll_list, _poll_list)
-		i += lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(eq, LPFC_POLL_SLOWPATH);
+		lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(eq);
 	if (!list_empty(&phba->poll_list))
 		mod_timer(&phba->cpuhp_poll_timer,
 			  jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(LPFC_POLL_HB));
@@ -15638,33 +15661,6 @@  void lpfc_sli4_poll_hbtimer(struct timer_list *t)
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
-inline int lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(struct lpfc_queue *eq, uint8_t path)
-{
-	struct lpfc_hba *phba = eq->phba;
-	int i = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Unlocking an irq is one of the entry point to check
-	 * for re-schedule, but we are good for io submission
-	 * path as midlayer does a get_cpu to glue us in. Flush
-	 * out the invalidate queue so we can see the updated
-	 * value for flag.
-	 */
-	smp_rmb();
-
-	if (READ_ONCE(eq->mode) == LPFC_EQ_POLL)
-		/* We will not likely get the completion for the caller
-		 * during this iteration but i guess that's fine.
-		 * Future io's coming on this eq should be able to
-		 * pick it up.  As for the case of single io's, they
-		 * will be handled through a sched from polling timer
-		 * function which is currently triggered every 1msec.
-		 */
-		i = lpfc_sli4_process_eq(phba, eq, LPFC_QUEUE_NOARM);
-
-	return i;
-}
-
 static inline void lpfc_sli4_add_to_poll_list(struct lpfc_queue *eq)
 {
 	struct lpfc_hba *phba = eq->phba;
@@ -21276,7 +21272,7 @@  lpfc_sli4_issue_wqe(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_sli4_hdw_queue *qp,
 		lpfc_sli_ringtxcmpl_put(phba, pring, pwqe);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pring->ring_lock, iflags);
 
-		lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(qp->hba_eq, LPFC_POLL_FASTPATH);
+		lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(qp->hba_eq);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -21298,7 +21294,7 @@  lpfc_sli4_issue_wqe(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_sli4_hdw_queue *qp,
 		lpfc_sli_ringtxcmpl_put(phba, pring, pwqe);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pring->ring_lock, iflags);
 
-		lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(qp->hba_eq, LPFC_POLL_FASTPATH);
+		lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(qp->hba_eq);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -21328,7 +21324,7 @@  lpfc_sli4_issue_wqe(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_sli4_hdw_queue *qp,
 		lpfc_sli_ringtxcmpl_put(phba, pring, pwqe);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pring->ring_lock, iflags);
 
-		lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(qp->hba_eq, LPFC_POLL_FASTPATH);
+		lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(qp->hba_eq);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	return WQE_ERROR;