[edk2,3/4] ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe: move to FDT client protocol

Message ID 1460468829-13982-4-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
State Accepted
Commit cd2178bb73b53ea41025e503fd7ffdb1d58c103b
Headers show

Commit Message

Ard Biesheuvel April 12, 2016, 1:47 p.m.
Instead of relying on VirtFdtDxe to populate various dynamic PCDs with
information retrieved from the host-provided device tree, perform the
PCI ECAM related DT node parsing directly in PciHostBridgeDxe.

Since we expect PcdPciExpressBaseAddress to have already been assigned
by the time this module's entry point is called, add a dependency on
PciPcdProducerLib as well.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

---
 ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c      | 261 ++++++++++++++++++--
 ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h      |   1 +
 ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf |  14 +-
 3 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

-- 
2.5.0

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Comments

Laszlo Ersek April 12, 2016, 3:41 p.m. | #1
On 04/12/16 15:47, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Instead of relying on VirtFdtDxe to populate various dynamic PCDs with

> information retrieved from the host-provided device tree, perform the

> PCI ECAM related DT node parsing directly in PciHostBridgeDxe.

>

> Since we expect PcdPciExpressBaseAddress to have already been assigned

> by the time this module's entry point is called, add a dependency on

> PciPcdProducerLib as well.


Hm, I disagree with the last paragraph (and the corresponding INF file
change). The point of adding the PciPcdProducerLib dependency to our
BaseCachingPciExpressLib instance, in patch #2, was exactly that
DXE_DRIVER modules that depend (transitively) on
BaseCachingPciExpressLib inherit the FdtPciPcdProducerLib constructor
automatically.

In other words, patch #2 ensures that any DXE_DRIVER in ArmVirtPkg that
performs PCI config space access (via our BaseCachingPciExpressLib, of
course) will automatically receive a discovered (possibly zero) ECAM
base address.

We have the following resolutions:

PciLib -> MdePkg/Library/BasePciLibPciExpress [ArmVirt.dsc.inc]
          depends on PciExpressLib

PciExpressLib -> BaseCachingPciExpressLib [ArmVirt.dsc.inc]
                 depends on PciPcdProducerLib (patch 2)

PciPcdProducerLib -> FdtPciPcdProducerLib [ArmVirtQemu.dsc, ArmVirtQemuKernel.dsc]
                     (also patch 2)

The automation in this resolution chain is intentional. The direct
PciPcdProducerLib dependency was only necessary for the
BaseCachingPciExpressLib instance.

(And the explicit plugging is only necessary for DXE_DRIVER and
UEFI_DRIVER modules that don't use PciLib and friends for PCI config
space access (hence they don't inherit our FdtPciPcdProducerLib
constructor), but depend on PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration.)

> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0

> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

> ---

>  ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c      | 261 ++++++++++++++++++--

>  ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h      |   1 +

>  ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf |  14 +-

>  3 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)


INF file first:

> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf

> index 6d782582e02d..e58a45ff0e2f 100644

> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf

> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf

> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ [Defines]

>    ENTRY_POINT                    = InitializePciHostBridge

>

>  [Packages]

> +  MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec

>    MdePkg/MdePkg.dec

>    ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dec


If you drop "ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dec" (in addition to the
other changes in this patch), does the driver continue to build? If so,
please include that removal.

>    ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtPkg.dec

> @@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ [LibraryClasses]

>    IoLib

>    PciLib

>    PcdLib

> +  PciPcdProducerLib


So, my main point is, please drop this hunk. PciHostBridgeDxe uses
PciLib directly (and see the resolution chain near the top); the PciLib
entry in [LibraryClasses] here is not accidental.

You can find, for example, PciRead8() / PciRead16() / PciRead32() calls
in the source. PciHostBridgeDxe uses PciLib to implement the
EFI_PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_IO_PROTOCOL.Pci.(Read|Write) accessors.

>  [Sources]

>    PciHostBridge.c

> @@ -50,20 +52,16 @@ [Protocols]

>    gEfiPciRootBridgeIoProtocolGuid                       ## PRODUCES

>    gEfiMetronomeArchProtocolGuid                         ## CONSUMES

>    gEfiDevicePathProtocolGuid                            ## PRODUCES

> +  gFdtClientProtocolGuid                                ## CONSUMES

>

>  [Pcd]

> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciBusMin

> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciBusMax

> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoBase

> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoSize

> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoTranslation

> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Base

> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Size

>    gEfiMdePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciExpressBaseAddress

>

>  [FeaturePcd]

>    gArmVirtTokenSpaceGuid.PcdKludgeMapPciMmioAsCached

> +  gArmVirtTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPureAcpiBoot

>

>  [depex]

>    gEfiMetronomeArchProtocolGuid AND

> -  gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid

> +  gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid AND

> +  gFdtClientProtocolGuid

>


Looks good otherwise; in particular I do agree with the explicit depex,
since we are going to use the protocol explicitly.

Let's see the header file:

> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h

> index 8161b546ff87..647fe1a52a7d 100644

> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h

> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h

> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@

>  #include <Protocol/PciRootBridgeIo.h>

>  #include <Protocol/Metronome.h>

>  #include <Protocol/DevicePath.h>

> +#include <Protocol/FdtClient.h>

>

>

>  #include <Library/BaseLib.h>


Makes sense.

C source:

> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c

> index 735c7f216318..eba6a7c47882 100644

> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c

> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c

> @@ -79,6 +79,230 @@ PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_INSTANCE mPciHostBridgeInstanceTemplate = {

>  // Implementation

>  //

>

> +STATIC

> +VOID

> +SetLinuxPciProbeOnlyProperty (

> +  IN FDT_CLIENT_PROTOCOL         *FdtClient

> +  )

> +{

> +  INT32         Node, Tmp;


Can you change the type of Tmp to UINT32?

> +  EFI_STATUS    Status;

> +

> +  if (!FeaturePcdGet (PcdPureAcpiBoot)) {

> +    //

> +    // Set the /chosen/linux,pci-probe-only property to 1, so that the PCI

> +    // setup we will perform in the firmware is honored by the Linux OS,

> +    // rather than torn down and done from scratch. This is generally a more

> +    // sensible approach, and aligns with what ACPI based OSes do typically.

> +    //

> +    // In case we are exposing an emulated VGA PCI device to the guest, which

> +    // may subsequently get exposed via the Graphics Output protocol and

> +    // driven as an efifb by Linux, we need this setting to prevent the

> +    // framebuffer from becoming unresponsive.

> +    //

> +    Status = FdtClient->GetOrInsertChosenNode (FdtClient, &Node);

> +

> +    if (Status == EFI_SUCCESS) {


This would be more idiomatic as

  !EFI_ERROR (Status)

> +      Tmp = SwapBytes32 (1);

> +      Status = FdtClient->SetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node,

> +                            "linux,pci-probe-only", &Tmp, sizeof (Tmp));

> +    }

> +    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

> +      DEBUG ((EFI_D_WARN,

> +        "Failed to set /chosen/linux,pci-probe-only property\n"));

> +    }

> +  }

> +}

> +

> +//

> +// We expect the "ranges" property of "pci-host-ecam-generic" to consist of

> +// records like this.

> +//

> +#pragma pack (1)

> +typedef struct {

> +  UINT32 Type;

> +  UINT64 ChildBase;

> +  UINT64 CpuBase;

> +  UINT64 Size;

> +} DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD;

> +#pragma pack ()

> +

> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RELOCATABLE  BIT31

> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_PREFETCHABLE BIT30

> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_ALIASED      BIT29

> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_MMIO32       BIT25

> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_MMIO64       (BIT25 | BIT24)

> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_IO           BIT24

> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_TYPEMASK     (BIT31 | BIT30 | BIT29 | BIT25 | BIT24)

> +

> +STATIC

> +EFI_STATUS

> +EFIAPI


You can drop EFIAPI here, but it doesn't hurt either.

> +ProcessPciHost (

> +  OUT  UINT64    *IoBase,

> +  OUT  UINT64    *IoSize,

> +  OUT  UINT64    *IoTranslation,

> +  OUT  UINT64    *MmioBase,

> +  OUT  UINT64    *MmioSize,

> +  OUT  UINT64    *MmioTranslation,

> +  OUT  UINT32    *BusMin,

> +  OUT  UINT32    *BusMax

> +  )

> +{

> +  FDT_CLIENT_PROTOCOL         *FdtClient;

> +  INT32                       Node;

> +  UINT64                      ConfigBase, ConfigSize;

> +  CONST VOID                  *Prop;

> +  UINT32                      Len;

> +  UINT32                      RecordIdx;

> +  EFI_STATUS                  Status;

> +

> +  //

> +  // The following output arguments are initialized only in

> +  // order to suppress '-Werror=maybe-uninitialized' warnings

> +  // *incorrectly* emitted by some gcc versions.

> +  //

> +  *IoBase = 0;

> +  *IoTranslation = 0;

> +  *MmioBase = 0;

> +  *MmioTranslation = 0;

> +  *BusMin = 0;

> +  *BusMax = 0;

> +

> +  //

> +  // *IoSize and *MmioSize are initialized to zero because the logic below

> +  // requires it. However, since they are also affected by the issue reported

> +  // above, they are initialized early.

> +  //

> +  *IoSize = 0;

> +  *MmioSize = 0;

> +

> +  Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gFdtClientProtocolGuid, NULL,

> +                  (VOID **)&FdtClient);

> +  ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);

> +

> +  Status = FdtClient->FindCompatibleNode (FdtClient, "pci-host-ecam-generic",

> +                        &Node);

> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO,

> +      "%a: No 'pci-host-ecam-generic' compatible DT node found\n",

> +      __FUNCTION__));

> +    return EFI_NOT_FOUND;

> +  }

> +

> +  DEBUG_CODE (

> +    INT32 Tmp;

> +

> +    //

> +    // A DT can legally describe multiple PCI host bridges, but we are not

> +    // equipped to deal with that. So assert that there is only one.

> +    //

> +    Status = FdtClient->FindNextCompatibleNode (FdtClient,

> +                          "pci-host-ecam-generic", Node, &Tmp);

> +    ASSERT (Status == EFI_NOT_FOUND);

> +  );

> +

> +  Status = FdtClient->GetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node, "reg", &Prop, &Len);

> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || Len != 2 * sizeof(UINT64)) {


Please insert a space after "sizeof".

> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: 'reg' property not found or invalid\n",

> +      __FUNCTION__));

> +    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

> +  }

> +

> +  //

> +  // Fetch the ECAM window.

> +  //

> +  ConfigBase = SwapBytes64 (((CONST UINT64 *)Prop)[0]);

> +  ConfigSize = SwapBytes64 (((CONST UINT64 *)Prop)[1]);

> +

> +  //

> +  // Fetch the bus range (note: inclusive).

> +  //

> +  Status = FdtClient->GetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node, "bus-range", &Prop,

> +                        &Len);

> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || Len != 2 * sizeof(UINT32)) {


Please insert a space after "sizeof".

> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: 'bus-range' not found or invalid\n",

> +      __FUNCTION__));

> +    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

> +  }

> +  *BusMin = SwapBytes32 (((CONST UINT32 *)Prop)[0]);

> +  *BusMax = SwapBytes32 (((CONST UINT32 *)Prop)[1]);

> +

> +  //

> +  // Sanity check: the config space must accommodate all 4K register bytes of

> +  // all 8 functions of all 32 devices of all buses.

> +  //

> +  if (*BusMax < *BusMin || *BusMax - *BusMin == MAX_UINT32 ||

> +      DivU64x32 (ConfigSize, SIZE_4KB * 8 * 32) < *BusMax - *BusMin + 1) {

> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: invalid 'bus-range' and/or 'reg'\n",

> +      __FUNCTION__));

> +    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

> +  }

> +

> +  //

> +  // Iterate over "ranges".

> +  //

> +  Status = FdtClient->GetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node, "ranges", &Prop, &Len);

> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || Len == 0 ||

> +      Len % sizeof (DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD) != 0) {

> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: 'ranges' not found or invalid\n", __FUNCTION__));

> +    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

> +  }

> +

> +  for (RecordIdx = 0; RecordIdx < Len / sizeof (DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD);

> +       ++RecordIdx) {

> +    CONST DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD *Record;

> +

> +    Record = (CONST DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD *)Prop + RecordIdx;

> +    switch (SwapBytes32 (Record->Type) & DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_TYPEMASK) {

> +    case DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_IO:

> +      *IoBase = SwapBytes64 (Record->ChildBase);

> +      *IoSize = SwapBytes64 (Record->Size);

> +      *IoTranslation = SwapBytes64 (Record->CpuBase) - *IoBase;

> +      break;

> +

> +    case DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_MMIO32:

> +      *MmioBase = SwapBytes64 (Record->ChildBase);

> +      *MmioSize = SwapBytes64 (Record->Size);

> +      *MmioTranslation = SwapBytes64 (Record->CpuBase) - *MmioBase;

> +

> +      if (*MmioBase > MAX_UINT32 || *MmioSize > MAX_UINT32 ||

> +          *MmioBase + *MmioSize > SIZE_4GB) {

> +        DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: MMIO32 space invalid\n", __FUNCTION__));

> +        return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

> +      }

> +

> +      if (*MmioTranslation != 0) {

> +        DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: unsupported nonzero MMIO32 translation "

> +          "0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, *MmioTranslation));

> +        return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;

> +      }

> +

> +      break;

> +    }

> +  }

> +  if (*IoSize == 0 || *MmioSize == 0) {

> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: %a space empty\n", __FUNCTION__,

> +      (*IoSize == 0) ? "IO" : "MMIO32"));

> +    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

> +  }

> +

> +  //

> +  // The dynamic PCD PcdPciExpressBaseAddress should have already been set,

> +  // and should match the value we found in the DT node.

> +  //

> +  ASSERT (PcdGet64 (PcdPciExpressBaseAddress) == ConfigBase);

> +

> +  SetLinuxPciProbeOnlyProperty (FdtClient);

> +

> +  DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO, "%a: Config[0x%Lx+0x%Lx) Bus[0x%x..0x%x] "

> +    "Io[0x%Lx+0x%Lx)@0x%Lx Mem[0x%Lx+0x%Lx)@0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, ConfigBase,

> +    ConfigSize, *BusMin, *BusMax, *IoBase, *IoSize, *IoTranslation, *MmioBase,

> +    *MmioSize, *MmioTranslation));

> +  return EFI_SUCCESS;

> +}

> +

> +

>  /**

>    Entry point of this driver

>

> @@ -103,25 +327,32 @@ InitializePciHostBridge (

>    UINTN                       Loop2;

>    PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_INSTANCE    *HostBridge;

>    PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_INSTANCE    *PrivateData;

> +  UINT64                      IoBase, IoSize, IoTranslation;

> +  UINT64                      MmioBase, MmioSize, MmioTranslation;

> +  UINT32                      BusMin, BusMax;

>

>    if (PcdGet64 (PcdPciExpressBaseAddress) == 0) {

>      DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO, "%a: PCI host bridge not present\n", __FUNCTION__));

>      return EFI_ABORTED;

>    }

>

> +  Status = ProcessPciHost (&IoBase, &IoSize, &IoTranslation, &MmioBase,

> +             &MmioSize, &MmioTranslation, &BusMin, &BusMax);

> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

> +    return Status;

> +  }

> +

>    mDriverImageHandle = ImageHandle;

>

> -  mResAperture[0][0].BusBase  = PcdGet32 (PcdPciBusMin);

> -  mResAperture[0][0].BusLimit = PcdGet32 (PcdPciBusMax);

> +  mResAperture[0][0].BusBase  = BusMin;

> +  mResAperture[0][0].BusLimit = BusMax;

>

> -  mResAperture[0][0].MemBase  = PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base);

> -  mResAperture[0][0].MemLimit = (UINT64)PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base) +

> -                                PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Size) - 1;

> +  mResAperture[0][0].MemBase  = MmioBase;

> +  mResAperture[0][0].MemLimit = MmioBase + MmioSize - 1;

>

> -  mResAperture[0][0].IoBase        = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase);

> -  mResAperture[0][0].IoLimit       = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase) +

> -                                     PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoSize) - 1;

> -  mResAperture[0][0].IoTranslation = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoTranslation);

> +  mResAperture[0][0].IoBase        = IoBase;

> +  mResAperture[0][0].IoLimit       = IoBase + IoSize - 1;

> +  mResAperture[0][0].IoTranslation = IoTranslation;

>

>    //

>    // Add IO and MMIO memory space, so that resources can be allocated in the

> @@ -129,8 +360,8 @@ InitializePciHostBridge (

>    //

>    Status = gDS->AddIoSpace (

>                    EfiGcdIoTypeIo,

> -                  PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase),

> -                  PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoSize)

> +                  IoBase,

> +                  IoSize

>                    );

>    ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);

>

> @@ -139,8 +370,8 @@ InitializePciHostBridge (

>

>    Status = gDS->AddMemorySpace (

>                    EfiGcdMemoryTypeMemoryMappedIo,

> -                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base),

> -                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Size),

> +                  MmioBase,

> +                  MmioSize,

>                    MmioAttributes

>                    );

>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

> @@ -149,8 +380,8 @@ InitializePciHostBridge (

>    }

>

>    Status = gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes (

> -                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base),

> -                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Size),

> +                  MmioBase,

> +                  MmioSize,

>                    MmioAttributes

>                    );

>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {


With the above warts fixed up (primarily: please remove the explicit
PciPcdProducerLib dependency, and its accompanying commit message
paragraph):

Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>


Thank you!
Laszlo

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
Ard Biesheuvel April 12, 2016, 3:59 p.m. | #2
On 12 April 2016 at 17:41, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/12/16 15:47, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

>> Instead of relying on VirtFdtDxe to populate various dynamic PCDs with

>> information retrieved from the host-provided device tree, perform the

>> PCI ECAM related DT node parsing directly in PciHostBridgeDxe.

>>

>> Since we expect PcdPciExpressBaseAddress to have already been assigned

>> by the time this module's entry point is called, add a dependency on

>> PciPcdProducerLib as well.

>

> Hm, I disagree with the last paragraph (and the corresponding INF file

> change). The point of adding the PciPcdProducerLib dependency to our

> BaseCachingPciExpressLib instance, in patch #2, was exactly that

> DXE_DRIVER modules that depend (transitively) on

> BaseCachingPciExpressLib inherit the FdtPciPcdProducerLib constructor

> automatically.

>

> In other words, patch #2 ensures that any DXE_DRIVER in ArmVirtPkg that

> performs PCI config space access (via our BaseCachingPciExpressLib, of

> course) will automatically receive a discovered (possibly zero) ECAM

> base address.

>

> We have the following resolutions:

>

> PciLib -> MdePkg/Library/BasePciLibPciExpress [ArmVirt.dsc.inc]

>           depends on PciExpressLib

>

> PciExpressLib -> BaseCachingPciExpressLib [ArmVirt.dsc.inc]

>                  depends on PciPcdProducerLib (patch 2)

>

> PciPcdProducerLib -> FdtPciPcdProducerLib [ArmVirtQemu.dsc, ArmVirtQemuKernel.dsc]

>                      (also patch 2)

>

> The automation in this resolution chain is intentional. The direct

> PciPcdProducerLib dependency was only necessary for the

> BaseCachingPciExpressLib instance.

>

> (And the explicit plugging is only necessary for DXE_DRIVER and

> UEFI_DRIVER modules that don't use PciLib and friends for PCI config

> space access (hence they don't inherit our FdtPciPcdProducerLib

> constructor), but depend on PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration.)

>


For all cases except this one, it is blatantly obvious. However, the
fact that this module does not go via PciLib but refers to
PcdPciExpressBaseAddress directly makes the line a little fuzzy.

But ultimately, I care most about whether it is guaranteed to work as
expected, which is clearly the case, so I am happy to incorporate this
change.

>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0

>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

>> ---

>>  ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c      | 261 ++++++++++++++++++--

>>  ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h      |   1 +

>>  ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf |  14 +-

>>  3 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

>

> INF file first:

>

>> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf

>> index 6d782582e02d..e58a45ff0e2f 100644

>> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf

>> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf

>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ [Defines]

>>    ENTRY_POINT                    = InitializePciHostBridge

>>

>>  [Packages]

>> +  MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec

>>    MdePkg/MdePkg.dec

>>    ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dec

>

> If you drop "ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dec" (in addition to the

> other changes in this patch), does the driver continue to build? If so,

> please include that removal.

>


Yes, that works

>>    ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtPkg.dec

>> @@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ [LibraryClasses]

>>    IoLib

>>    PciLib

>>    PcdLib

>> +  PciPcdProducerLib

>

> So, my main point is, please drop this hunk. PciHostBridgeDxe uses

> PciLib directly (and see the resolution chain near the top); the PciLib

> entry in [LibraryClasses] here is not accidental.

>

> You can find, for example, PciRead8() / PciRead16() / PciRead32() calls

> in the source. PciHostBridgeDxe uses PciLib to implement the

> EFI_PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_IO_PROTOCOL.Pci.(Read|Write) accessors.

>

>>  [Sources]

>>    PciHostBridge.c

>> @@ -50,20 +52,16 @@ [Protocols]

>>    gEfiPciRootBridgeIoProtocolGuid                       ## PRODUCES

>>    gEfiMetronomeArchProtocolGuid                         ## CONSUMES

>>    gEfiDevicePathProtocolGuid                            ## PRODUCES

>> +  gFdtClientProtocolGuid                                ## CONSUMES

>>

>>  [Pcd]

>> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciBusMin

>> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciBusMax

>> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoBase

>> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoSize

>> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoTranslation

>> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Base

>> -  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Size

>>    gEfiMdePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciExpressBaseAddress

>>

>>  [FeaturePcd]

>>    gArmVirtTokenSpaceGuid.PcdKludgeMapPciMmioAsCached

>> +  gArmVirtTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPureAcpiBoot

>>

>>  [depex]

>>    gEfiMetronomeArchProtocolGuid AND

>> -  gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid

>> +  gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid AND

>> +  gFdtClientProtocolGuid

>>

>

> Looks good otherwise; in particular I do agree with the explicit depex,

> since we are going to use the protocol explicitly.

>

> Let's see the header file:

>

>> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h

>> index 8161b546ff87..647fe1a52a7d 100644

>> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h

>> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h

>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@

>>  #include <Protocol/PciRootBridgeIo.h>

>>  #include <Protocol/Metronome.h>

>>  #include <Protocol/DevicePath.h>

>> +#include <Protocol/FdtClient.h>

>>

>>

>>  #include <Library/BaseLib.h>

>

> Makes sense.

>

> C source:

>

>> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c

>> index 735c7f216318..eba6a7c47882 100644

>> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c

>> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c

>> @@ -79,6 +79,230 @@ PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_INSTANCE mPciHostBridgeInstanceTemplate = {

>>  // Implementation

>>  //

>>

>> +STATIC

>> +VOID

>> +SetLinuxPciProbeOnlyProperty (

>> +  IN FDT_CLIENT_PROTOCOL         *FdtClient

>> +  )

>> +{

>> +  INT32         Node, Tmp;

>

> Can you change the type of Tmp to UINT32?

>

>> +  EFI_STATUS    Status;

>> +

>> +  if (!FeaturePcdGet (PcdPureAcpiBoot)) {

>> +    //

>> +    // Set the /chosen/linux,pci-probe-only property to 1, so that the PCI

>> +    // setup we will perform in the firmware is honored by the Linux OS,

>> +    // rather than torn down and done from scratch. This is generally a more

>> +    // sensible approach, and aligns with what ACPI based OSes do typically.

>> +    //

>> +    // In case we are exposing an emulated VGA PCI device to the guest, which

>> +    // may subsequently get exposed via the Graphics Output protocol and

>> +    // driven as an efifb by Linux, we need this setting to prevent the

>> +    // framebuffer from becoming unresponsive.

>> +    //

>> +    Status = FdtClient->GetOrInsertChosenNode (FdtClient, &Node);

>> +

>> +    if (Status == EFI_SUCCESS) {

>

> This would be more idiomatic as

>

>   !EFI_ERROR (Status)

>


True. I think these lines went through a couple of iterations of
compound conditionals ...

>> +      Tmp = SwapBytes32 (1);

>> +      Status = FdtClient->SetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node,

>> +                            "linux,pci-probe-only", &Tmp, sizeof (Tmp));

>> +    }

>> +    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

>> +      DEBUG ((EFI_D_WARN,

>> +        "Failed to set /chosen/linux,pci-probe-only property\n"));

>> +    }

>> +  }

>> +}

>> +

>> +//

>> +// We expect the "ranges" property of "pci-host-ecam-generic" to consist of

>> +// records like this.

>> +//

>> +#pragma pack (1)

>> +typedef struct {

>> +  UINT32 Type;

>> +  UINT64 ChildBase;

>> +  UINT64 CpuBase;

>> +  UINT64 Size;

>> +} DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD;

>> +#pragma pack ()

>> +

>> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RELOCATABLE  BIT31

>> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_PREFETCHABLE BIT30

>> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_ALIASED      BIT29

>> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_MMIO32       BIT25

>> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_MMIO64       (BIT25 | BIT24)

>> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_IO           BIT24

>> +#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_TYPEMASK     (BIT31 | BIT30 | BIT29 | BIT25 | BIT24)

>> +

>> +STATIC

>> +EFI_STATUS

>> +EFIAPI

>

> You can drop EFIAPI here, but it doesn't hurt either.

>

>> +ProcessPciHost (

>> +  OUT  UINT64    *IoBase,

>> +  OUT  UINT64    *IoSize,

>> +  OUT  UINT64    *IoTranslation,

>> +  OUT  UINT64    *MmioBase,

>> +  OUT  UINT64    *MmioSize,

>> +  OUT  UINT64    *MmioTranslation,

>> +  OUT  UINT32    *BusMin,

>> +  OUT  UINT32    *BusMax

>> +  )

>> +{

>> +  FDT_CLIENT_PROTOCOL         *FdtClient;

>> +  INT32                       Node;

>> +  UINT64                      ConfigBase, ConfigSize;

>> +  CONST VOID                  *Prop;

>> +  UINT32                      Len;

>> +  UINT32                      RecordIdx;

>> +  EFI_STATUS                  Status;

>> +

>> +  //

>> +  // The following output arguments are initialized only in

>> +  // order to suppress '-Werror=maybe-uninitialized' warnings

>> +  // *incorrectly* emitted by some gcc versions.

>> +  //

>> +  *IoBase = 0;

>> +  *IoTranslation = 0;

>> +  *MmioBase = 0;

>> +  *MmioTranslation = 0;

>> +  *BusMin = 0;

>> +  *BusMax = 0;

>> +

>> +  //

>> +  // *IoSize and *MmioSize are initialized to zero because the logic below

>> +  // requires it. However, since they are also affected by the issue reported

>> +  // above, they are initialized early.

>> +  //

>> +  *IoSize = 0;

>> +  *MmioSize = 0;

>> +

>> +  Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gFdtClientProtocolGuid, NULL,

>> +                  (VOID **)&FdtClient);

>> +  ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);

>> +

>> +  Status = FdtClient->FindCompatibleNode (FdtClient, "pci-host-ecam-generic",

>> +                        &Node);

>> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

>> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO,

>> +      "%a: No 'pci-host-ecam-generic' compatible DT node found\n",

>> +      __FUNCTION__));

>> +    return EFI_NOT_FOUND;

>> +  }

>> +

>> +  DEBUG_CODE (

>> +    INT32 Tmp;

>> +

>> +    //

>> +    // A DT can legally describe multiple PCI host bridges, but we are not

>> +    // equipped to deal with that. So assert that there is only one.

>> +    //

>> +    Status = FdtClient->FindNextCompatibleNode (FdtClient,

>> +                          "pci-host-ecam-generic", Node, &Tmp);

>> +    ASSERT (Status == EFI_NOT_FOUND);

>> +  );

>> +

>> +  Status = FdtClient->GetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node, "reg", &Prop, &Len);

>> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || Len != 2 * sizeof(UINT64)) {

>

> Please insert a space after "sizeof".

>

>> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: 'reg' property not found or invalid\n",

>> +      __FUNCTION__));

>> +    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

>> +  }

>> +

>> +  //

>> +  // Fetch the ECAM window.

>> +  //

>> +  ConfigBase = SwapBytes64 (((CONST UINT64 *)Prop)[0]);

>> +  ConfigSize = SwapBytes64 (((CONST UINT64 *)Prop)[1]);

>> +

>> +  //

>> +  // Fetch the bus range (note: inclusive).

>> +  //

>> +  Status = FdtClient->GetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node, "bus-range", &Prop,

>> +                        &Len);

>> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || Len != 2 * sizeof(UINT32)) {

>

> Please insert a space after "sizeof".

>

>> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: 'bus-range' not found or invalid\n",

>> +      __FUNCTION__));

>> +    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

>> +  }

>> +  *BusMin = SwapBytes32 (((CONST UINT32 *)Prop)[0]);

>> +  *BusMax = SwapBytes32 (((CONST UINT32 *)Prop)[1]);

>> +

>> +  //

>> +  // Sanity check: the config space must accommodate all 4K register bytes of

>> +  // all 8 functions of all 32 devices of all buses.

>> +  //

>> +  if (*BusMax < *BusMin || *BusMax - *BusMin == MAX_UINT32 ||

>> +      DivU64x32 (ConfigSize, SIZE_4KB * 8 * 32) < *BusMax - *BusMin + 1) {

>> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: invalid 'bus-range' and/or 'reg'\n",

>> +      __FUNCTION__));

>> +    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

>> +  }

>> +

>> +  //

>> +  // Iterate over "ranges".

>> +  //

>> +  Status = FdtClient->GetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node, "ranges", &Prop, &Len);

>> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || Len == 0 ||

>> +      Len % sizeof (DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD) != 0) {

>> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: 'ranges' not found or invalid\n", __FUNCTION__));

>> +    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

>> +  }

>> +

>> +  for (RecordIdx = 0; RecordIdx < Len / sizeof (DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD);

>> +       ++RecordIdx) {

>> +    CONST DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD *Record;

>> +

>> +    Record = (CONST DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD *)Prop + RecordIdx;

>> +    switch (SwapBytes32 (Record->Type) & DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_TYPEMASK) {

>> +    case DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_IO:

>> +      *IoBase = SwapBytes64 (Record->ChildBase);

>> +      *IoSize = SwapBytes64 (Record->Size);

>> +      *IoTranslation = SwapBytes64 (Record->CpuBase) - *IoBase;

>> +      break;

>> +

>> +    case DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_MMIO32:

>> +      *MmioBase = SwapBytes64 (Record->ChildBase);

>> +      *MmioSize = SwapBytes64 (Record->Size);

>> +      *MmioTranslation = SwapBytes64 (Record->CpuBase) - *MmioBase;

>> +

>> +      if (*MmioBase > MAX_UINT32 || *MmioSize > MAX_UINT32 ||

>> +          *MmioBase + *MmioSize > SIZE_4GB) {

>> +        DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: MMIO32 space invalid\n", __FUNCTION__));

>> +        return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

>> +      }

>> +

>> +      if (*MmioTranslation != 0) {

>> +        DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: unsupported nonzero MMIO32 translation "

>> +          "0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, *MmioTranslation));

>> +        return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;

>> +      }

>> +

>> +      break;

>> +    }

>> +  }

>> +  if (*IoSize == 0 || *MmioSize == 0) {

>> +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: %a space empty\n", __FUNCTION__,

>> +      (*IoSize == 0) ? "IO" : "MMIO32"));

>> +    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;

>> +  }

>> +

>> +  //

>> +  // The dynamic PCD PcdPciExpressBaseAddress should have already been set,

>> +  // and should match the value we found in the DT node.

>> +  //

>> +  ASSERT (PcdGet64 (PcdPciExpressBaseAddress) == ConfigBase);

>> +

>> +  SetLinuxPciProbeOnlyProperty (FdtClient);

>> +

>> +  DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO, "%a: Config[0x%Lx+0x%Lx) Bus[0x%x..0x%x] "

>> +    "Io[0x%Lx+0x%Lx)@0x%Lx Mem[0x%Lx+0x%Lx)@0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, ConfigBase,

>> +    ConfigSize, *BusMin, *BusMax, *IoBase, *IoSize, *IoTranslation, *MmioBase,

>> +    *MmioSize, *MmioTranslation));

>> +  return EFI_SUCCESS;

>> +}

>> +

>> +

>>  /**

>>    Entry point of this driver

>>

>> @@ -103,25 +327,32 @@ InitializePciHostBridge (

>>    UINTN                       Loop2;

>>    PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_INSTANCE    *HostBridge;

>>    PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_INSTANCE    *PrivateData;

>> +  UINT64                      IoBase, IoSize, IoTranslation;

>> +  UINT64                      MmioBase, MmioSize, MmioTranslation;

>> +  UINT32                      BusMin, BusMax;

>>

>>    if (PcdGet64 (PcdPciExpressBaseAddress) == 0) {

>>      DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO, "%a: PCI host bridge not present\n", __FUNCTION__));

>>      return EFI_ABORTED;

>>    }

>>

>> +  Status = ProcessPciHost (&IoBase, &IoSize, &IoTranslation, &MmioBase,

>> +             &MmioSize, &MmioTranslation, &BusMin, &BusMax);

>> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

>> +    return Status;

>> +  }

>> +

>>    mDriverImageHandle = ImageHandle;

>>

>> -  mResAperture[0][0].BusBase  = PcdGet32 (PcdPciBusMin);

>> -  mResAperture[0][0].BusLimit = PcdGet32 (PcdPciBusMax);

>> +  mResAperture[0][0].BusBase  = BusMin;

>> +  mResAperture[0][0].BusLimit = BusMax;

>>

>> -  mResAperture[0][0].MemBase  = PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base);

>> -  mResAperture[0][0].MemLimit = (UINT64)PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base) +

>> -                                PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Size) - 1;

>> +  mResAperture[0][0].MemBase  = MmioBase;

>> +  mResAperture[0][0].MemLimit = MmioBase + MmioSize - 1;

>>

>> -  mResAperture[0][0].IoBase        = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase);

>> -  mResAperture[0][0].IoLimit       = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase) +

>> -                                     PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoSize) - 1;

>> -  mResAperture[0][0].IoTranslation = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoTranslation);

>> +  mResAperture[0][0].IoBase        = IoBase;

>> +  mResAperture[0][0].IoLimit       = IoBase + IoSize - 1;

>> +  mResAperture[0][0].IoTranslation = IoTranslation;

>>

>>    //

>>    // Add IO and MMIO memory space, so that resources can be allocated in the

>> @@ -129,8 +360,8 @@ InitializePciHostBridge (

>>    //

>>    Status = gDS->AddIoSpace (

>>                    EfiGcdIoTypeIo,

>> -                  PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase),

>> -                  PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoSize)

>> +                  IoBase,

>> +                  IoSize

>>                    );

>>    ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);

>>

>> @@ -139,8 +370,8 @@ InitializePciHostBridge (

>>

>>    Status = gDS->AddMemorySpace (

>>                    EfiGcdMemoryTypeMemoryMappedIo,

>> -                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base),

>> -                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Size),

>> +                  MmioBase,

>> +                  MmioSize,

>>                    MmioAttributes

>>                    );

>>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

>> @@ -149,8 +380,8 @@ InitializePciHostBridge (

>>    }

>>

>>    Status = gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes (

>> -                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base),

>> -                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Size),

>> +                  MmioBase,

>> +                  MmioSize,

>>                    MmioAttributes

>>                    );

>>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

>

> With the above warts fixed up (primarily: please remove the explicit

> PciPcdProducerLib dependency, and its accompanying commit message

> paragraph):

>

> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

>

> Thank you!

> Laszlo

>

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
Laszlo Ersek April 12, 2016, 4:10 p.m. | #3
On 04/12/16 17:59, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 12 April 2016 at 17:41, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:

>> On 04/12/16 15:47, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

>>> Instead of relying on VirtFdtDxe to populate various dynamic PCDs with

>>> information retrieved from the host-provided device tree, perform the

>>> PCI ECAM related DT node parsing directly in PciHostBridgeDxe.

>>>

>>> Since we expect PcdPciExpressBaseAddress to have already been assigned

>>> by the time this module's entry point is called, add a dependency on

>>> PciPcdProducerLib as well.

>>

>> Hm, I disagree with the last paragraph (and the corresponding INF file

>> change). The point of adding the PciPcdProducerLib dependency to our

>> BaseCachingPciExpressLib instance, in patch #2, was exactly that

>> DXE_DRIVER modules that depend (transitively) on

>> BaseCachingPciExpressLib inherit the FdtPciPcdProducerLib constructor

>> automatically.

>>

>> In other words, patch #2 ensures that any DXE_DRIVER in ArmVirtPkg that

>> performs PCI config space access (via our BaseCachingPciExpressLib, of

>> course) will automatically receive a discovered (possibly zero) ECAM

>> base address.

>>

>> We have the following resolutions:

>>

>> PciLib -> MdePkg/Library/BasePciLibPciExpress [ArmVirt.dsc.inc]

>>           depends on PciExpressLib

>>

>> PciExpressLib -> BaseCachingPciExpressLib [ArmVirt.dsc.inc]

>>                  depends on PciPcdProducerLib (patch 2)

>>

>> PciPcdProducerLib -> FdtPciPcdProducerLib [ArmVirtQemu.dsc, ArmVirtQemuKernel.dsc]

>>                      (also patch 2)

>>

>> The automation in this resolution chain is intentional. The direct

>> PciPcdProducerLib dependency was only necessary for the

>> BaseCachingPciExpressLib instance.

>>

>> (And the explicit plugging is only necessary for DXE_DRIVER and

>> UEFI_DRIVER modules that don't use PciLib and friends for PCI config

>> space access (hence they don't inherit our FdtPciPcdProducerLib

>> constructor), but depend on PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration.)

>>

> 

> For all cases except this one, it is blatantly obvious. However, the

> fact that this module does not go via PciLib but refers to

> PcdPciExpressBaseAddress directly makes the line a little fuzzy.


I agree that the line is a bit more fuzzy than in the previous
iteration, when our PciExpressLib instance was setting
PcdPciExpressBaseAddress directly (and here it is delegated even more
deeply).

However, it remains true (in our little ArmVirtPkg world) that
"somewhere down the construction chain" of PciLib,
PcdPciExpressBaseAddress must become assigned. In other words, our PCI
config space accessing DXE_DRIVER modules should be able to say, "I'm
consuming PciLib for config space access, so I trust the ECAM base
address will be initialized by the time I gain control".

> But ultimately, I care most about whether it is guaranteed to work as

> expected, which is clearly the case, so I am happy to incorporate this

> change.


Thank you.

Cheers
Laszlo
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Patch

diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c
index 735c7f216318..eba6a7c47882 100644
--- a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c
+++ b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c
@@ -79,6 +79,230 @@  PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_INSTANCE mPciHostBridgeInstanceTemplate = {
 // Implementation
 //
 
+STATIC
+VOID
+SetLinuxPciProbeOnlyProperty (
+  IN FDT_CLIENT_PROTOCOL         *FdtClient
+  )
+{
+  INT32         Node, Tmp;
+  EFI_STATUS    Status;
+
+  if (!FeaturePcdGet (PcdPureAcpiBoot)) {
+    //
+    // Set the /chosen/linux,pci-probe-only property to 1, so that the PCI
+    // setup we will perform in the firmware is honored by the Linux OS,
+    // rather than torn down and done from scratch. This is generally a more
+    // sensible approach, and aligns with what ACPI based OSes do typically.
+    //
+    // In case we are exposing an emulated VGA PCI device to the guest, which
+    // may subsequently get exposed via the Graphics Output protocol and
+    // driven as an efifb by Linux, we need this setting to prevent the
+    // framebuffer from becoming unresponsive.
+    //
+    Status = FdtClient->GetOrInsertChosenNode (FdtClient, &Node);
+
+    if (Status == EFI_SUCCESS) {
+      Tmp = SwapBytes32 (1);
+      Status = FdtClient->SetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node,
+                            "linux,pci-probe-only", &Tmp, sizeof (Tmp));
+    }
+    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+      DEBUG ((EFI_D_WARN,
+        "Failed to set /chosen/linux,pci-probe-only property\n"));
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+//
+// We expect the "ranges" property of "pci-host-ecam-generic" to consist of
+// records like this.
+//
+#pragma pack (1)
+typedef struct {
+  UINT32 Type;
+  UINT64 ChildBase;
+  UINT64 CpuBase;
+  UINT64 Size;
+} DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD;
+#pragma pack ()
+
+#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RELOCATABLE  BIT31
+#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_PREFETCHABLE BIT30
+#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_ALIASED      BIT29
+#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_MMIO32       BIT25
+#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_MMIO64       (BIT25 | BIT24)
+#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_IO           BIT24
+#define DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_TYPEMASK     (BIT31 | BIT30 | BIT29 | BIT25 | BIT24)
+
+STATIC
+EFI_STATUS
+EFIAPI
+ProcessPciHost (
+  OUT  UINT64    *IoBase,
+  OUT  UINT64    *IoSize,
+  OUT  UINT64    *IoTranslation,
+  OUT  UINT64    *MmioBase,
+  OUT  UINT64    *MmioSize,
+  OUT  UINT64    *MmioTranslation,
+  OUT  UINT32    *BusMin,
+  OUT  UINT32    *BusMax
+  )
+{
+  FDT_CLIENT_PROTOCOL         *FdtClient;
+  INT32                       Node;
+  UINT64                      ConfigBase, ConfigSize;
+  CONST VOID                  *Prop;
+  UINT32                      Len;
+  UINT32                      RecordIdx;
+  EFI_STATUS                  Status;
+
+  //
+  // The following output arguments are initialized only in
+  // order to suppress '-Werror=maybe-uninitialized' warnings
+  // *incorrectly* emitted by some gcc versions.
+  //
+  *IoBase = 0;
+  *IoTranslation = 0;
+  *MmioBase = 0;
+  *MmioTranslation = 0;
+  *BusMin = 0;
+  *BusMax = 0;
+
+  //
+  // *IoSize and *MmioSize are initialized to zero because the logic below
+  // requires it. However, since they are also affected by the issue reported
+  // above, they are initialized early.
+  //
+  *IoSize = 0;
+  *MmioSize = 0;
+
+  Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gFdtClientProtocolGuid, NULL,
+                  (VOID **)&FdtClient);
+  ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+
+  Status = FdtClient->FindCompatibleNode (FdtClient, "pci-host-ecam-generic",
+                        &Node);
+  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+    DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO,
+      "%a: No 'pci-host-ecam-generic' compatible DT node found\n",
+      __FUNCTION__));
+    return EFI_NOT_FOUND;
+  }
+
+  DEBUG_CODE (
+    INT32 Tmp;
+
+    //
+    // A DT can legally describe multiple PCI host bridges, but we are not
+    // equipped to deal with that. So assert that there is only one.
+    //
+    Status = FdtClient->FindNextCompatibleNode (FdtClient,
+                          "pci-host-ecam-generic", Node, &Tmp);
+    ASSERT (Status == EFI_NOT_FOUND);
+  );
+
+  Status = FdtClient->GetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node, "reg", &Prop, &Len);
+  if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || Len != 2 * sizeof(UINT64)) {
+    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: 'reg' property not found or invalid\n",
+      __FUNCTION__));
+    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
+  }
+
+  //
+  // Fetch the ECAM window.
+  //
+  ConfigBase = SwapBytes64 (((CONST UINT64 *)Prop)[0]);
+  ConfigSize = SwapBytes64 (((CONST UINT64 *)Prop)[1]);
+
+  //
+  // Fetch the bus range (note: inclusive).
+  //
+  Status = FdtClient->GetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node, "bus-range", &Prop,
+                        &Len);
+  if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || Len != 2 * sizeof(UINT32)) {
+    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: 'bus-range' not found or invalid\n",
+      __FUNCTION__));
+    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
+  }
+  *BusMin = SwapBytes32 (((CONST UINT32 *)Prop)[0]);
+  *BusMax = SwapBytes32 (((CONST UINT32 *)Prop)[1]);
+
+  //
+  // Sanity check: the config space must accommodate all 4K register bytes of
+  // all 8 functions of all 32 devices of all buses.
+  //
+  if (*BusMax < *BusMin || *BusMax - *BusMin == MAX_UINT32 ||
+      DivU64x32 (ConfigSize, SIZE_4KB * 8 * 32) < *BusMax - *BusMin + 1) {
+    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: invalid 'bus-range' and/or 'reg'\n",
+      __FUNCTION__));
+    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
+  }
+
+  //
+  // Iterate over "ranges".
+  //
+  Status = FdtClient->GetNodeProperty (FdtClient, Node, "ranges", &Prop, &Len);
+  if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || Len == 0 ||
+      Len % sizeof (DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD) != 0) {
+    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: 'ranges' not found or invalid\n", __FUNCTION__));
+    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
+  }
+
+  for (RecordIdx = 0; RecordIdx < Len / sizeof (DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD);
+       ++RecordIdx) {
+    CONST DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD *Record;
+
+    Record = (CONST DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_RECORD *)Prop + RecordIdx;
+    switch (SwapBytes32 (Record->Type) & DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_TYPEMASK) {
+    case DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_IO:
+      *IoBase = SwapBytes64 (Record->ChildBase);
+      *IoSize = SwapBytes64 (Record->Size);
+      *IoTranslation = SwapBytes64 (Record->CpuBase) - *IoBase;
+      break;
+
+    case DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_MMIO32:
+      *MmioBase = SwapBytes64 (Record->ChildBase);
+      *MmioSize = SwapBytes64 (Record->Size);
+      *MmioTranslation = SwapBytes64 (Record->CpuBase) - *MmioBase;
+
+      if (*MmioBase > MAX_UINT32 || *MmioSize > MAX_UINT32 ||
+          *MmioBase + *MmioSize > SIZE_4GB) {
+        DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: MMIO32 space invalid\n", __FUNCTION__));
+        return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
+      }
+
+      if (*MmioTranslation != 0) {
+        DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: unsupported nonzero MMIO32 translation "
+          "0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, *MmioTranslation));
+        return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
+      }
+
+      break;
+    }
+  }
+  if (*IoSize == 0 || *MmioSize == 0) {
+    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: %a space empty\n", __FUNCTION__,
+      (*IoSize == 0) ? "IO" : "MMIO32"));
+    return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
+  }
+
+  //
+  // The dynamic PCD PcdPciExpressBaseAddress should have already been set,
+  // and should match the value we found in the DT node.
+  //
+  ASSERT (PcdGet64 (PcdPciExpressBaseAddress) == ConfigBase);
+
+  SetLinuxPciProbeOnlyProperty (FdtClient);
+
+  DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO, "%a: Config[0x%Lx+0x%Lx) Bus[0x%x..0x%x] "
+    "Io[0x%Lx+0x%Lx)@0x%Lx Mem[0x%Lx+0x%Lx)@0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, ConfigBase,
+    ConfigSize, *BusMin, *BusMax, *IoBase, *IoSize, *IoTranslation, *MmioBase,
+    *MmioSize, *MmioTranslation));
+  return EFI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+
 /**
   Entry point of this driver
 
@@ -103,25 +327,32 @@  InitializePciHostBridge (
   UINTN                       Loop2;
   PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_INSTANCE    *HostBridge;
   PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_INSTANCE    *PrivateData;
+  UINT64                      IoBase, IoSize, IoTranslation;
+  UINT64                      MmioBase, MmioSize, MmioTranslation;
+  UINT32                      BusMin, BusMax;
 
   if (PcdGet64 (PcdPciExpressBaseAddress) == 0) {
     DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO, "%a: PCI host bridge not present\n", __FUNCTION__));
     return EFI_ABORTED;
   }
 
+  Status = ProcessPciHost (&IoBase, &IoSize, &IoTranslation, &MmioBase,
+             &MmioSize, &MmioTranslation, &BusMin, &BusMax);
+  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+    return Status;
+  }
+
   mDriverImageHandle = ImageHandle;
 
-  mResAperture[0][0].BusBase  = PcdGet32 (PcdPciBusMin);
-  mResAperture[0][0].BusLimit = PcdGet32 (PcdPciBusMax);
+  mResAperture[0][0].BusBase  = BusMin;
+  mResAperture[0][0].BusLimit = BusMax;
 
-  mResAperture[0][0].MemBase  = PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base);
-  mResAperture[0][0].MemLimit = (UINT64)PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base) +
-                                PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Size) - 1;
+  mResAperture[0][0].MemBase  = MmioBase;
+  mResAperture[0][0].MemLimit = MmioBase + MmioSize - 1;
 
-  mResAperture[0][0].IoBase        = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase);
-  mResAperture[0][0].IoLimit       = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase) +
-                                     PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoSize) - 1;
-  mResAperture[0][0].IoTranslation = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoTranslation);
+  mResAperture[0][0].IoBase        = IoBase;
+  mResAperture[0][0].IoLimit       = IoBase + IoSize - 1;
+  mResAperture[0][0].IoTranslation = IoTranslation;
 
   //
   // Add IO and MMIO memory space, so that resources can be allocated in the
@@ -129,8 +360,8 @@  InitializePciHostBridge (
   //
   Status = gDS->AddIoSpace (
                   EfiGcdIoTypeIo,
-                  PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase),
-                  PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoSize)
+                  IoBase,
+                  IoSize
                   );
   ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
 
@@ -139,8 +370,8 @@  InitializePciHostBridge (
 
   Status = gDS->AddMemorySpace (
                   EfiGcdMemoryTypeMemoryMappedIo,
-                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base),
-                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Size),
+                  MmioBase,
+                  MmioSize,
                   MmioAttributes
                   );
   if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
@@ -149,8 +380,8 @@  InitializePciHostBridge (
   }
 
   Status = gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes (
-                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Base),
-                  PcdGet32 (PcdPciMmio32Size),
+                  MmioBase,
+                  MmioSize,
                   MmioAttributes
                   );
   if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h
index 8161b546ff87..647fe1a52a7d 100644
--- a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h
+++ b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ 
 #include <Protocol/PciRootBridgeIo.h>
 #include <Protocol/Metronome.h>
 #include <Protocol/DevicePath.h>
+#include <Protocol/FdtClient.h>
 
 
 #include <Library/BaseLib.h>
diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf
index 6d782582e02d..e58a45ff0e2f 100644
--- a/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf
+++ b/ArmVirtPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridgeDxe.inf
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@  [Defines]
   ENTRY_POINT                    = InitializePciHostBridge
 
 [Packages]
+  MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
   MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
   ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dec
   ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtPkg.dec
@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@  [LibraryClasses]
   IoLib
   PciLib
   PcdLib
+  PciPcdProducerLib
 
 [Sources]
   PciHostBridge.c
@@ -50,20 +52,16 @@  [Protocols]
   gEfiPciRootBridgeIoProtocolGuid                       ## PRODUCES
   gEfiMetronomeArchProtocolGuid                         ## CONSUMES
   gEfiDevicePathProtocolGuid                            ## PRODUCES
+  gFdtClientProtocolGuid                                ## CONSUMES
 
 [Pcd]
-  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciBusMin
-  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciBusMax
-  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoBase
-  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoSize
-  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoTranslation
-  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Base
-  gArmPlatformTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Size
   gEfiMdePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciExpressBaseAddress
 
 [FeaturePcd]
   gArmVirtTokenSpaceGuid.PcdKludgeMapPciMmioAsCached
+  gArmVirtTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPureAcpiBoot
 
 [depex]
   gEfiMetronomeArchProtocolGuid AND
-  gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid
+  gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid AND
+  gFdtClientProtocolGuid