diff mbox

arm64: spin-table: add missing of_node_put()

Message ID 1461115411-2843-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
State Accepted
Commit 2fee7d5b08b6419bb59de9e875d895e3a6e7bf5a
Headers show

Commit Message

Masahiro Yamada April 20, 2016, 1:23 a.m. UTC
Since of_get_cpu_node() increments refcount, the node should be put.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>

---

 arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Will Deacon April 20, 2016, 9:17 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:23:31AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Since of_get_cpu_node() increments refcount, the node should be put.


Urgh, I really hate the dt refcounting stuff.

> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>

> ---

> 

>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c | 11 ++++++-----

>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c

> index aef3605..18a71bc 100644

> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c

> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c

> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static void write_pen_release(u64 val)

>  static int smp_spin_table_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu)

>  {

>  	struct device_node *dn;

> +	int ret;

>  

>  	dn = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);

>  	if (!dn)

> @@ -60,15 +61,15 @@ static int smp_spin_table_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu)

>  	/*

>  	 * Determine the address from which the CPU is polling.

>  	 */

> -	if (of_property_read_u64(dn, "cpu-release-addr",

> -				 &cpu_release_addr[cpu])) {

> +	ret = of_property_read_u64(dn, "cpu-release-addr",

> +				   &cpu_release_addr[cpu]);

> +	if (ret)

>  		pr_err("CPU %d: missing or invalid cpu-release-addr property\n",

>  		       cpu);

>  

> -		return -1;

> -	}

> +	of_node_put(dn);

>  

> -	return 0;

> +	return ret;



Looks ok to me. The slight change in return code should be harmless for
->cpu_init.

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>


Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Catalin Marinas April 20, 2016, 9:35 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:23:31AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Since of_get_cpu_node() increments refcount, the node should be put.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>


Queued for 4.6. Thanks.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c
index aef3605..18a71bc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@  static void write_pen_release(u64 val)
 static int smp_spin_table_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct device_node *dn;
+	int ret;
 
 	dn = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
 	if (!dn)
@@ -60,15 +61,15 @@  static int smp_spin_table_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu)
 	/*
 	 * Determine the address from which the CPU is polling.
 	 */
-	if (of_property_read_u64(dn, "cpu-release-addr",
-				 &cpu_release_addr[cpu])) {
+	ret = of_property_read_u64(dn, "cpu-release-addr",
+				   &cpu_release_addr[cpu]);
+	if (ret)
 		pr_err("CPU %d: missing or invalid cpu-release-addr property\n",
 		       cpu);
 
-		return -1;
-	}
+	of_node_put(dn);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int smp_spin_table_cpu_prepare(unsigned int cpu)