diff mbox

ipv6: Fix soft lockup for ipv6 network notifier.

Message ID 57761E04.8030202@huawei.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Ding Tianhong July 1, 2016, 7:38 a.m. UTC
The problem was occurs in my system that a lot of drviers register
its own handler to the notifiler call chain for netdev_chain, and
then create 4095 vlan dev for one nic, and add several ipv6 address
on each one of them, just like this:

for i in `seq 1 4095`; do ip link add link eth0 name eth0.$i type vlan id $i; done
for i in `seq 1 4095`; do ip -6 addr add 2001::$i dev eth0.$i; done
for i in `seq 1 4095`; do ip -6 addr add 2002::$i dev eth0.$i; done
for i in `seq 1 4095`; do ip -6 addr add 2003::$i dev eth0.$i; done

ifconfig eth0 up
ifconfig eth0 down

then it will halt several seconds, and occurs softlockup:

<0>[ 7620.364058]NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [ifconfig:19186]
<0>[ 7620.364592]Call trace:
<4>[ 7620.364599][<ffffffc000208f68>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x220
<4>[ 7620.364603][<ffffffc0002091a8>] show_stack+0x20/0x28
<4>[ 7620.364607][<ffffffc000691fac>] dump_stack+0x90/0xb0
<4>[ 7620.364612][<ffffffc0002cacbc>] watchdog_timer_fn+0x41c/0x460
<4>[ 7620.364617][<ffffffc000289ec8>] __run_hrtimer+0x98/0x2d8
<4>[ 7620.364620][<ffffffc00028a3e0>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x110/0x288
<4>[ 7620.364624][<ffffffc00059c0c8>] arch_timer_handler_phys+0x38/0x48
<4>[ 7620.364628][<ffffffc000276d2c>] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x9c/0x190
<4>[ 7620.364632][<ffffffc000271ef8>] generic_handle_irq+0x40/0x58
<4>[ 7620.364635][<ffffffc000272270>] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
<4>[ 7620.364638][<ffffffc000200634>] gic_handle_irq+0xc4/0x1c8
<4>[ 7620.364641]Exception stack(0xffffffc0309b3640 to 0xffffffc0309b3770)
<4>[ 7620.364644]3640: 0000000000001000 0000000000000000 ffffffc0309b37c0 ffffffbfa1019cf8
<4>[ 7620.364647]3660: 0000000080000145 ffffffc0309b3958 0000000000000000 ffffffbfa1013008
<4>[ 7620.364651]3680: 00000000000007f0 ffffffbfa131b770 ffffffd08aaadc40 ffffffbfa1019cf8
<4>[ 7620.364654]36a0: ffffffbfa1019cc4 ffffffd089c2b000 ffffffd08eff8000 ffffffc0309b3958
<4>[ 7620.364656]36c0: ffffffbfa101c5c0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffbfa101c66c
<4>[ 7620.364659]36e0: 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f 0000000000000030 ffffffffffffffff ffff000000000000
<4>[ 7620.364662]3700: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffc000393d58 0000007f794d67b0
<4>[ 7620.364665]3720: 0000007fe62215d0 ffffffc0309b3830 ffffffc00021d8e0 ffffffbfa1049b68
<4>[ 7620.364668]3740: ffffffc000697578 ffffffc0006974b8 ffffffc0309b3958 0000000000000000
<4>[ 7620.364670]3760: ffffffbfa1013008 00000000000007f0
<4>[ 7620.364673][<ffffffc000203780>] el1_irq+0x80/0x100
<4>[ 7620.364692][<ffffffbfa1019ed4>] fib6_walk+0x3c/0x70 [ipv6]
<4>[ 7620.364710][<ffffffbfa1019f70>] fib6_clean_tree+0x68/0x90 [ipv6]
<4>[ 7620.364727][<ffffffbfa101a020>] __fib6_clean_all+0x88/0xc0 [ipv6]
<4>[ 7620.364746][<ffffffbfa101c760>] fib6_clean_all+0x28/0x30 [ipv6]
<4>[ 7620.364763][<ffffffbfa101933c>] rt6_ifdown+0x64/0x148 [ipv6]
<4>[ 7620.364781][<ffffffbfa100e6d8>] addrconf_ifdown+0x68/0x540 [ipv6]
<4>[ 7620.364798][<ffffffbfa1010f58>] addrconf_notify+0xd0/0x8b8 [ipv6]
<4>[ 7620.364801][<ffffffc00023f83c>] notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0xa0
<4>[ 7620.364804][<ffffffc00023f9e0>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28
<4>[ 7620.364809][<ffffffc0005cbab4>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x4c/0x80
<4>[ 7620.364812][<ffffffc0005cbfc8>] dev_close_many+0xd0/0x138
<4>[ 7620.364821][<ffffffbfa33be6e8>] vlan_device_event+0x4a8/0x6a0 [8021q]
<4>[ 7620.364824][<ffffffc00023f83c>] notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0xa0
<4>[ 7620.364827][<ffffffc00023f9e0>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28
<4>[ 7620.364830][<ffffffc0005cbab4>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x4c/0x80
<4>[ 7620.364833][<ffffffc0005d5148>] __dev_notify_flags+0xb8/0xe0
<4>[ 7620.364836][<ffffffc0005d5994>] dev_change_flags+0x54/0x68
<4>[ 7620.364840][<ffffffc00064a620>] devinet_ioctl+0x650/0x700
<4>[ 7620.364843][<ffffffc00064bea4>] inet_ioctl+0xa4/0xc8
<4>[ 7620.364847][<ffffffc0005b1094>] sock_do_ioctl+0x44/0x88
<4>[ 7620.364850][<ffffffc0005b1a3c>] sock_ioctl+0x23c/0x308
<4>[ 7620.364854][<ffffffc000393bc4>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x48c/0x620
<4>[ 7620.364857][<ffffffc000393dec>] SyS_ioctl+0x94/0xa8

-- 
1.9.0

Comments

Ding Tianhong July 1, 2016, 8:10 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2016/7/1 15:57, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 15:38 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:

> ...

>>  net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 6 ++++++

>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

>>

>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c

>> index f555f4f..e294a3d 100644

>> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c

>> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c

>> @@ -3284,6 +3284,12 @@ restart:

>>  		spin_unlock_bh(&addrconf_hash_lock);

>>  	}

>>  

>> +	/*

>> +	 * It is safe here to schedule out to avoid softlocking if preempt

>> +	 * is disabled.

>> +	 */

>> +	cond_resched();

>> +

>>  	write_lock_bh(&idev->lock);

>>  

>>  	addrconf_del_rs_timer(idev);

> 

> Seeing you apparently cooked your patch against an old kernel (which

> one ?) ...

> 

> I tried vanilla net-next kernel, and apparently I could not trigger the

> softlockup you mentioned.

> 

> Are you sure current kernel has a bug to begin with ?

> 

have you disable the preempt? The problem will disappear if you enable the preempt voluntary or preempt.
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set

I test the 4.1 lts kernel and found this problem, and I didn't found any patch to fix this from linux 4.1, but I will try to test in 4.7 kernel version.

Thanks
Ding

> Thanks.

> 

> 

> 

> 

> .

>
Ding Tianhong July 6, 2016, 8:15 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2016/7/1 16:23, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 16:10 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:

>> On 2016/7/1 15:57, Eric Dumazet wrote:

>>> On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 15:38 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:

>>> ...

>>>>  net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 6 ++++++

>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

>>>>

>>>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c

>>>> index f555f4f..e294a3d 100644

>>>> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c

>>>> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c

>>>> @@ -3284,6 +3284,12 @@ restart:

>>>>  		spin_unlock_bh(&addrconf_hash_lock);

>>>>  	}

>>>>  

>>>> +	/*

>>>> +	 * It is safe here to schedule out to avoid softlocking if preempt

>>>> +	 * is disabled.

>>>> +	 */

>>>> +	cond_resched();

>>>> +

>>>>  	write_lock_bh(&idev->lock);

>>>>  

>>>>  	addrconf_del_rs_timer(idev);

>>>

>>> Seeing you apparently cooked your patch against an old kernel (which

>>> one ?) ...

>>>

>>> I tried vanilla net-next kernel, and apparently I could not trigger the

>>> softlockup you mentioned.

>>>

>>> Are you sure current kernel has a bug to begin with ?

>>>

>> have you disable the preempt? The problem will disappear if you enable the preempt voluntary or preempt.

>> CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y

>> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set

>> # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set

>>

>> I test the 4.1 lts kernel and found this problem, and I didn't found any patch to fix this from linux 4.1, but I will try to test in 4.7 kernel version.

> 

> I usually do not have PREEMPT enabled in my kernels.

> 

> $ grep PREEMPT .config

> CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y

> CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y

> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set

> # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set

> 

> Also the whole script is quite fast on latest kernels. I am guessing you

> are chasing an already fixed problem.

> 

> 

Hi Eric:

I had found out that the patch aaf92f(netfilter: conntrack: resched in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup) solve the problem, 
this patch add cond_sched() in the nf_ct_iterate_cleanup() which will be called in the net notifier chain every time,
and I revert this patch at kernel 4.7-rc4 , it will panic for soft lockup, so I am not sure whether our patch is need,
it looks like if I disable the CONFIG for netfilter that would register the nf_ct_iterate_cleanup as notifier, the problem still be exist.

Thanks.
Ding 






> 

> 

> .

>
Ding Tianhong July 7, 2016, 1:42 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2016/7/6 16:44, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 16:15 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:

>> Hi Eric:

>>

>> I had found out that the patch aaf92f(netfilter: conntrack: resched in

>> nf_ct_iterate_cleanup) solve the problem, 

>> this patch add cond_sched() in the nf_ct_iterate_cleanup() which will

>> be called in the net notifier chain every time,

>> and I revert this patch at kernel 4.7-rc4 , it will panic for soft

>> lockup, so I am not sure whether our patch is need,

>> it looks like if I disable the CONFIG for netfilter that would

>> register the nf_ct_iterate_cleanup as notifier, the problem still be

>> exist.

> 

> Well, I do not have conntrack on my kernels, and I can not reproduce the

> issue.

> 

> So I am guessing other patches also solved a scalability issue, between

> 4.1 and 4.7

> 

> I am aware of something that David did for IPv4, but this might help as

> well for IPv6.

> 

> commit fbd40ea0180a2d328c5adc61414dc8bab9335ce2

> ipv4: Don't do expensive useless work during inetdev destroy.

>     


Hi Eric:

I check this patch:
[root@localhost linux]# git name-rev fbd40ea0180a2d328c5adc61414dc8bab9335ce2
fbd40ea0180a2d328c5adc61414dc8bab9335ce2 tags/v4.6-rc1~91^2~63

So the kernel4.7-RC4 already has this patch, but it have no effort if I revert the commit  aaf92f(netfilter: conntrack: resched in
nf_ct_iterate_cleanup), So I don't think David's patch could fix this problem.

Thanks
Ding

> 

> 

> 

>
diff mbox

Patch

=================================cut here========================================

It looks that the notifier_call_chain has to deal with too much handler, and will not
feed the watchdog until finish the work, and the notifier_call_chain would call the
ipv6_dev_notf several times and hold the cpu for a long time, so add cond_resched()
in the ipv6_dev_notf in order to schedule out in the network notifiers to avoid softlocking
to fix this problem.

Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
---
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index f555f4f..e294a3d 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -3284,6 +3284,12 @@  restart:
 		spin_unlock_bh(&addrconf_hash_lock);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * It is safe here to schedule out to avoid softlocking if preempt
+	 * is disabled.
+	 */
+	cond_resched();
+
 	write_lock_bh(&idev->lock);
 
 	addrconf_del_rs_timer(idev);