Message ID | 20231002135458.2603293-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 26da9a8d279f30f1d0aa33cea0003a3d37fa051c |
Headers | show |
Series | [v1,1/1] ACPI: NFIT: Switch to use acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() | expand |
On 10/2/2023 3:54 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the > object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > index f96bf32cd368..280da408c02c 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > @@ -1737,9 +1737,8 @@ __weak void nfit_intel_shutdown_status(struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem) > if ((nfit_mem->dsm_mask & (1 << func)) == 0) > return; > > - out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, guid, revid, func, &in_obj); > - if (!out_obj || out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER > - || out_obj->buffer.length < sizeof(smart)) { > + out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, guid, revid, func, &in_obj, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER); This line is 90 characters long, wouldn't it be better to split it ? > + if (!out_obj || out_obj->buffer.length < sizeof(smart)) { > dev_dbg(dev->parent, "%s: failed to retrieve initial health\n", > dev_name(dev)); While at it maybe fix alignment ? :-) > ACPI_FREE(out_obj); Just nitpicks, functionally code seems correct to me. Reviewed-by: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:27:02PM +0200, Wilczynski, Michal wrote: > On 10/2/2023 3:54 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > + out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, guid, revid, func, &in_obj, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER); > > This line is 90 characters long, wouldn't it be better to split it ? I dunno it's a problem, but if people insist, I can redo that. ... > > + if (!out_obj || out_obj->buffer.length < sizeof(smart)) { > > dev_dbg(dev->parent, "%s: failed to retrieve initial health\n", > > dev_name(dev)); > > While at it maybe fix alignment ? :-) I don't think it's in scope of this change. > > ACPI_FREE(out_obj); > > Just nitpicks, functionally code seems correct to me. > Reviewed-by: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@intel.com> Thank you!
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 04:54:58PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the > object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant. Dan, do you have any comments?
Wilczynski, Michal wrote: > > > On 10/2/2023 3:54 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the > > object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 5 ++--- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > > index f96bf32cd368..280da408c02c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c > > @@ -1737,9 +1737,8 @@ __weak void nfit_intel_shutdown_status(struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem) > > if ((nfit_mem->dsm_mask & (1 << func)) == 0) > > return; > > > > - out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, guid, revid, func, &in_obj); > > - if (!out_obj || out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER > > - || out_obj->buffer.length < sizeof(smart)) { > > + out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, guid, revid, func, &in_obj, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER); > > This line is 90 characters long, wouldn't it be better to split it ? 100 characters is allowed these days. > > + if (!out_obj || out_obj->buffer.length < sizeof(smart)) { > > dev_dbg(dev->parent, "%s: failed to retrieve initial health\n", > > dev_name(dev)); > > While at it maybe fix alignment ? :-) Life is too short to fiddle with indentation. For old code leave it alone, for new code just use clang-format.
Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the > object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant. Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 06:03:28PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the > > object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant. > > Looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Thank you! Who is taking care of this? Rafael?
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:03 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 06:03:28PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the > > > object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant. > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > > Thank you! > > Who is taking care of this? Rafael? I can apply it.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 07:19:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 04:11:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:03 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 06:03:28PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the > > > > > object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant. > > > > > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > Who is taking care of this? Rafael? > > > > I can apply it. > > Would be nice, thank you! Any news on this?
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:49 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 07:19:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 04:11:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:03 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 06:03:28PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the > > > > > > object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant. > > > > > > > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > Who is taking care of this? Rafael? > > > > > > I can apply it. > > > > Would be nice, thank you! > > Any news on this? Fell through the cracks, sorry about that. Applied now (as 6.9 material). Thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c index f96bf32cd368..280da408c02c 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c @@ -1737,9 +1737,8 @@ __weak void nfit_intel_shutdown_status(struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem) if ((nfit_mem->dsm_mask & (1 << func)) == 0) return; - out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, guid, revid, func, &in_obj); - if (!out_obj || out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER - || out_obj->buffer.length < sizeof(smart)) { + out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, guid, revid, func, &in_obj, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER); + if (!out_obj || out_obj->buffer.length < sizeof(smart)) { dev_dbg(dev->parent, "%s: failed to retrieve initial health\n", dev_name(dev)); ACPI_FREE(out_obj);
The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)