diff mbox series

[2/8] hw/pci-host/designware: Initialize root function in host bridge realize

Message ID 20231012121857.31873-3-philmd@linaro.org
State New
Headers show
Series hw/pci-host/designware: QOM shuffling (Host bridge <-> Root function) | expand

Commit Message

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Oct. 12, 2023, 12:18 p.m. UTC
There are no root function properties exposed by the host
bridge, so using a 2-step QOM creation isn't really useful.

Simplify by creating the root function when the host bridge
is realized.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
 hw/pci-host/designware.c | 15 ++++-----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Maydell Oct. 17, 2023, 4:32 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 13:19, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> There are no root function properties exposed by the host
> bridge, so using a 2-step QOM creation isn't really useful.
>
> Simplify by creating the root function when the host bridge
> is realized.

It's not necessary, but on the other hand "init child objects
in init; realize child objects in realize" is the standard
way to do this. Does not moving this to the realize method
block anything in the rest of the patchset?

thanks
-- PMM
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Feb. 6, 2024, 4:35 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Peter,

On 17/10/23 18:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 13:19, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> There are no root function properties exposed by the host
>> bridge, so using a 2-step QOM creation isn't really useful.
>>
>> Simplify by creating the root function when the host bridge
>> is realized.
> 
> It's not necessary, but on the other hand "init child objects
> in init; realize child objects in realize" is the standard
> way to do this. Does not moving this to the realize method
> block anything in the rest of the patchset?

I thought it was only recommended to use the init/realize
pair when properties could be consumed. Otherwise using
a single handler makes a model simpler.

No problem if I can drop this patch.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/pci-host/designware.c b/hw/pci-host/designware.c
index 304eca1b5c..692e0731cd 100644
--- a/hw/pci-host/designware.c
+++ b/hw/pci-host/designware.c
@@ -707,6 +707,10 @@  static void designware_pcie_host_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
                        "pcie-bus-address-space");
     pci_setup_iommu(pci->bus, designware_pcie_host_set_iommu, s);
 
+    object_initialize_child(OBJECT(dev), "root", &s->root,
+                            TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ROOT);
+    qdev_prop_set_int32(DEVICE(&s->root), "addr", PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
+    qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(&s->root), "multifunction", false);
     qdev_realize(DEVICE(&s->root), BUS(pci->bus), &error_fatal);
 }
 
@@ -736,22 +740,11 @@  static void designware_pcie_host_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
     dc->vmsd = &vmstate_designware_pcie_host;
 }
 
-static void designware_pcie_host_init(Object *obj)
-{
-    DesignwarePCIEHost *s = DESIGNWARE_PCIE_HOST(obj);
-    DesignwarePCIERoot *root = &s->root;
-
-    object_initialize_child(obj, "root", root, TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ROOT);
-    qdev_prop_set_int32(DEVICE(root), "addr", PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
-    qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(root), "multifunction", false);
-}
-
 static const TypeInfo designware_pcie_types[] = {
     {
         .name           = TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_HOST,
         .parent         = TYPE_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE,
         .instance_size  = sizeof(DesignwarePCIEHost),
-        .instance_init  = designware_pcie_host_init,
         .class_init     = designware_pcie_host_class_init,
     }, {
         .name           = TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ROOT,