diff mbox series

[2/2] kunit: Add example of kunit_activate_static_stub() with pointer-to-function

Message ID 20231218161044.215640-2-rf@opensource.cirrus.com
State New
Headers show
Series [1/2] kunit: Allow passing function pointer to kunit_activate_static_stub() | expand

Commit Message

Richard Fitzgerald Dec. 18, 2023, 4:10 p.m. UTC
Adds a variant of example_static_stub_test() that shows use of a
pointer-to-function with kunit_activate_static_stub().

A const pointer to the add_one() function is declared. This
pointer-to-function is passed to kunit_activate_static_stub() and
kunit_deactivate_static_stub() instead of passing add_one directly.

Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
---
 lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

Comments

Rae Moar Dec. 19, 2023, 11:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:10 AM Richard Fitzgerald
<rf@opensource.cirrus.com> wrote:
>
> Adds a variant of example_static_stub_test() that shows use of a
> pointer-to-function with kunit_activate_static_stub().
>
> A const pointer to the add_one() function is declared. This
> pointer-to-function is passed to kunit_activate_static_stub() and
> kunit_deactivate_static_stub() instead of passing add_one directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>

Hello!

This test looks good to me. However, I had issues applying this patch
so I think it needs rebasing due to the newest additions to
kselftest/kunit. But otherwise this patch looks good other than my
very small comment below.

Thanks!
-Rae

> ---
>  lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
> index d2f7a3c62c18..9e57f341dc37 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ static int subtract_one(int i)
>         return i - 1;
>  }
>
> +static int (* const add_one_fn_ptr)(int i) = add_one;

This is a bit of a nit but could you add a brief comment above this
pointer definition? This would then match the commenting on the other
functions in kunit-example-test and provide more context for those
looking at the example tests.

> +
>  /*
>   * This test shows the use of static stubs.
>   */
> @@ -187,6 +189,30 @@ static void example_static_stub_test(struct kunit *test)
>         KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * This test shows the use of static stubs when the function being
> + * replaced is provided as a pointer-to-function instead of the
> + * actual function. This is useful for providing access to static
> + * functions in a module by exporting a pointer to that function
> + * instead of having to change the static function to a non-static
> + * exported function.
> + */
> +static void example_static_stub_using_fn_ptr_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       /* By default, function is not stubbed. */
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
> +
> +       /* Replace add_one() with subtract_one(). */
> +       kunit_activate_static_stub(test, add_one_fn_ptr, subtract_one);
> +
> +       /* add_one() is now replaced. */
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 0);
> +
> +       /* Return add_one() to normal. */
> +       kunit_deactivate_static_stub(test, add_one_fn_ptr);
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct example_param {
>         int value;
>  } example_params_array[] = {
> @@ -245,6 +271,7 @@ static struct kunit_case example_test_cases[] = {
>         KUNIT_CASE(example_mark_skipped_test),
>         KUNIT_CASE(example_all_expect_macros_test),
>         KUNIT_CASE(example_static_stub_test),
> +       KUNIT_CASE(example_static_stub_using_fn_ptr_test),
>         KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(example_params_test, example_gen_params),
>         KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(example_slow_test),
>         {}
> --
> 2.30.2
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
index d2f7a3c62c18..9e57f341dc37 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
@@ -168,6 +168,8 @@  static int subtract_one(int i)
 	return i - 1;
 }
 
+static int (* const add_one_fn_ptr)(int i) = add_one;
+
 /*
  * This test shows the use of static stubs.
  */
@@ -187,6 +189,30 @@  static void example_static_stub_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
 }
 
+/*
+ * This test shows the use of static stubs when the function being
+ * replaced is provided as a pointer-to-function instead of the
+ * actual function. This is useful for providing access to static
+ * functions in a module by exporting a pointer to that function
+ * instead of having to change the static function to a non-static
+ * exported function.
+ */
+static void example_static_stub_using_fn_ptr_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	/* By default, function is not stubbed. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
+
+	/* Replace add_one() with subtract_one(). */
+	kunit_activate_static_stub(test, add_one_fn_ptr, subtract_one);
+
+	/* add_one() is now replaced. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 0);
+
+	/* Return add_one() to normal. */
+	kunit_deactivate_static_stub(test, add_one_fn_ptr);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
+}
+
 static const struct example_param {
 	int value;
 } example_params_array[] = {
@@ -245,6 +271,7 @@  static struct kunit_case example_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(example_mark_skipped_test),
 	KUNIT_CASE(example_all_expect_macros_test),
 	KUNIT_CASE(example_static_stub_test),
+	KUNIT_CASE(example_static_stub_using_fn_ptr_test),
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(example_params_test, example_gen_params),
 	KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(example_slow_test),
 	{}