diff mbox

[v2] gpio: of: fix GPIO drivers with multiple gpio_chip for a single node

Message ID 1477360064-6644-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
State Accepted
Commit c7e9d39831a31682285cc31ddf7dd06c0fe59138
Headers show

Commit Message

Masahiro Yamada Oct. 25, 2016, 1:47 a.m. UTC
Sylvain Lemieux reports the LPC32xx GPIO driver is broken since
commit 762c2e46c059 ("gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and
struct gg_data").  Probably, gpio-etraxfs.c and gpio-davinci.c are
broken too.

Those drivers register multiple gpio_chip that are associated to a
single OF node, and their own .of_xlate() checks if the passed
gpio_chip is valid.

Now, the problem is of_find_gpiochip_by_node() returns the first
gpio_chip found to match the given node.  So, .of_xlate() fails,
except for the first GPIO bank.

Reverting the commit could be a solution, but I do not want to go
back to the mess of struct gg_data.  Another solution here is to
take the match by a node pointer and the success of .of_xlate().
It is a bit clumsy to call .of_xlate twice; for gpio_chip matching
and for really getting the gpio_desc index.  Perhaps, our long-term
goal might be to convert the drivers to single chip registration,
but this commit will solve the problem until then.

Fixes: 762c2e46c059 ("gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data")
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>

Reported-by: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
Tested-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>

---

Changes in v2:
  - correcton pointed out by Sylvain:
       chip->of_xlate(chip, gpiospec, NULL) >= 0

 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Linus Walleij Oct. 25, 2016, 12:09 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:47 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:

> Sylvain Lemieux reports the LPC32xx GPIO driver is broken since

> commit 762c2e46c059 ("gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and

> struct gg_data").  Probably, gpio-etraxfs.c and gpio-davinci.c are

> broken too.

>

> Those drivers register multiple gpio_chip that are associated to a

> single OF node, and their own .of_xlate() checks if the passed

> gpio_chip is valid.

>

> Now, the problem is of_find_gpiochip_by_node() returns the first

> gpio_chip found to match the given node.  So, .of_xlate() fails,

> except for the first GPIO bank.

>

> Reverting the commit could be a solution, but I do not want to go

> back to the mess of struct gg_data.  Another solution here is to

> take the match by a node pointer and the success of .of_xlate().

> It is a bit clumsy to call .of_xlate twice; for gpio_chip matching

> and for really getting the gpio_desc index.  Perhaps, our long-term

> goal might be to convert the drivers to single chip registration,

> but this commit will solve the problem until then.

>

> Fixes: 762c2e46c059 ("gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data")

> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>

> Reported-by: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>

> Tested-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>

> ---

>

> Changes in v2:

>   - correcton pointed out by Sylvain:

>        chip->of_xlate(chip, gpiospec, NULL) >= 0


Patch applied for fixes.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
index ecad3f0..193f15d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -26,14 +26,18 @@ 
 
 #include "gpiolib.h"
 
-static int of_gpiochip_match_node(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
+static int of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
 {
-	return chip->gpiodev->dev.of_node == data;
+	struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec = data;
+
+	return chip->gpiodev->dev.of_node == gpiospec->np &&
+				chip->of_xlate(chip, gpiospec, NULL) >= 0;
 }
 
-static struct gpio_chip *of_find_gpiochip_by_node(struct device_node *np)
+static struct gpio_chip *of_find_gpiochip_by_xlate(
+					struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec)
 {
-	return gpiochip_find(np, of_gpiochip_match_node);
+	return gpiochip_find(gpiospec, of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate);
 }
 
 static struct gpio_desc *of_xlate_and_get_gpiod_flags(struct gpio_chip *chip,
@@ -79,7 +83,7 @@  struct gpio_desc *of_get_named_gpiod_flags(struct device_node *np,
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
 
-	chip = of_find_gpiochip_by_node(gpiospec.np);
+	chip = of_find_gpiochip_by_xlate(&gpiospec);
 	if (!chip) {
 		desc = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 		goto out;