@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-CFLAGS += -O3 -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall
+CFLAGS += -O3 -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall -I../../../../usr/include/
LDLIBS += -lrt -lpthread -lm
TEST_GEN_PROGS = rtctest
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <linux/rtc.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
@@ -24,12 +25,17 @@
#define READ_LOOP_SLEEP_MS 11
static char *rtc_file = "/dev/rtc0";
+static char *rtc_procfs = "/proc/driver/rtc";
FIXTURE(rtc) {
int fd;
};
FIXTURE_SETUP(rtc) {
+ if (access(rtc_file, R_OK) != 0)
+ SKIP(return, "Skipping test since cannot access %s, perhaps miss sudo",
+ rtc_file);
+
self->fd = open(rtc_file, O_RDONLY);
}
@@ -82,6 +88,36 @@ static void nanosleep_with_retries(long ns)
}
}
+static bool is_rtc_alarm_supported(int fd)
+{
+ struct rtc_param param = { 0 };
+ int rc;
+ char buf[1024] = { 0 };
+
+ /* Validate kernel reflects unsupported RTC alarm state */
+ param.param = RTC_PARAM_FEATURES;
+ param.index = 0;
+ rc = ioctl(fd, RTC_PARAM_GET, ¶m);
+ if (rc < 0) {
+ /* Fallback to read rtc procfs */
+ fd = open(rtc_procfs, O_RDONLY);
+ if (fd != -1) {
+ rc = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
+ close(fd);
+
+ /* Check for the presence of "alarm" in the buf */
+ if (strstr(buf, "alarm") == NULL)
+ return false;
+ } else
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ if ((param.uvalue & _BITUL(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM)) == 0)
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, date_read_loop, READ_LOOP_DURATION_SEC + 2) {
int rc;
long iter_count = 0;
@@ -202,6 +238,9 @@ TEST_F(rtc, alarm_alm_set) {
SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file);
ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd);
+ if (!is_rtc_alarm_supported(self->fd))
+ SKIP(return, "Skipping test since alarms are not supported.");
+
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &tm);
ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
@@ -209,11 +248,7 @@ TEST_F(rtc, alarm_alm_set) {
gmtime_r(&secs, (struct tm *)&tm);
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_ALM_SET, &tm);
- if (rc == -1) {
- ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
- TH_LOG("skip alarms are not supported.");
- return;
- }
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_ALM_READ, &tm);
ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
@@ -260,6 +295,9 @@ TEST_F(rtc, alarm_wkalm_set) {
SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file);
ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd);
+ if (!is_rtc_alarm_supported(self->fd))
+ SKIP(return, "Skipping test since alarms are not supported.");
+
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &alarm.time);
ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
@@ -269,11 +307,7 @@ TEST_F(rtc, alarm_wkalm_set) {
alarm.enabled = 1;
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_WKALM_SET, &alarm);
- if (rc == -1) {
- ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
- TH_LOG("skip alarms are not supported.");
- return;
- }
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_WKALM_RD, &alarm);
ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
@@ -312,6 +346,9 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, alarm_alm_set_minute, 65) {
SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file);
ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd);
+ if (!is_rtc_alarm_supported(self->fd))
+ SKIP(return, "Skipping test since alarms are not supported.");
+
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &tm);
ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
@@ -319,11 +356,7 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, alarm_alm_set_minute, 65) {
gmtime_r(&secs, (struct tm *)&tm);
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_ALM_SET, &tm);
- if (rc == -1) {
- ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
- TH_LOG("skip alarms are not supported.");
- return;
- }
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_ALM_READ, &tm);
ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
@@ -370,6 +403,9 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, alarm_wkalm_set_minute, 65) {
SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file);
ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd);
+ if (!is_rtc_alarm_supported(self->fd))
+ SKIP(return, "Skipping test since alarms are not supported.");
+
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &alarm.time);
ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
@@ -379,11 +415,7 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, alarm_wkalm_set_minute, 65) {
alarm.enabled = 1;
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_WKALM_SET, &alarm);
- if (rc == -1) {
- ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
- TH_LOG("skip alarms are not supported.");
- return;
- }
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_WKALM_RD, &alarm);
ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
In alarm_wkalm_set and alarm_wkalm_set_minute test, they use different ioctl (RTC_ALM_SET/RTC_WKALM_SET) for alarm feature detection. They will skip testing if RTC_ALM_SET/RTC_WKALM_SET ioctl returns an EINVAL error code. This design may miss detecting real problems when the efi.set_wakeup_time() return errors and then RTC_ALM_SET/RTC_WKALM_SET ioctl returns an EINVAL error code with RTC_FEATURE_ALARM enabled. In order to make rtctest more explicit and robust, we propose to use RTC_PARAM_GET ioctl interface to check rtc alarm feature state before running alarm related tests. If the kernel does not support RTC_PARAM_GET ioctl interface, we will fallback to check the presence of "alarm" in /proc/driver/rtc. The rtctest requires the read permission on /dev/rtc0. The rtctest will be skipped if the /dev/rtc0 is not readable. Requires commit 101ca8d05913b ("rtc: efi: Enable SET/GET WAKEUP services as optional") Reviewed-by: Jeremy Szu <jszu@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Joseph Jang <jjang@nvidia.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/rtc/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)