Message ID | 20241008-fix-sm8x50-mdp-icc-v1-2-77ffd361b8de@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: dts: qcom: sm8[56]50: correct MDSS interconnects | expand |
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi index 01ac3769ffa6..455774516b08 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi @@ -3455,11 +3455,8 @@ mdss: display-subsystem@ae00000 { resets = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_CORE_BCR>; interconnects = <&mmss_noc MASTER_MDP QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS - &gem_noc SLAVE_LLCC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>, - <&mc_virt MASTER_LLCC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>; - interconnect-names = "mdp0-mem", - "mdp1-mem"; + interconnect-names = "mdp0-mem"; power-domains = <&dispcc MDSS_GDSC>;
SM8650 lists two interconnects for the display subsystem, mdp0-mem (between MDP and LLCC) and mdp1-mem (between LLCC and EBI, memory). The second interconnect is a misuse. mdpN-mem paths should be used for several outboud MDP interconnects rather than the path between LLCC and memory. This kind of misuse can result in bandwidth underflows, possibly degradating picture quality as the required memory bandwidth is divided between all mdpN-mem paths (and LLCC-EBI should not be a part of such division). Drop the second path and use direct MDP-EBI path for mdp0-mem until we support separate MDP-LLCC and LLCC-EBI paths. Fixes: 10e024671295 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: add interconnect dependent device nodes") Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)