| Message ID | 5877BF16.4090004@foss.arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On 01/12/2017 12:38 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch fixes the build issue on x86_64 (and other targets that > define NO_FUNCTION_CSE but not a particular value) > on the GCC 5 branch. thanks! -- Nathan Sidwell
diff --git a/gcc/postreload.c b/gcc/postreload.c index ba6591d..fc0499a 100644 --- a/gcc/postreload.c +++ b/gcc/postreload.c @@ -122,8 +122,10 @@ reload_cse_simplify (rtx_insn *insn, rtx testreg) /* If NO_FUNCTION_CSE has been set by the target, then we should not try to cse function calls. */ - if (NO_FUNCTION_CSE && CALL_P (insn)) +#ifdef NO_FUNCTION_CSE + if (CALL_P (insn)) return false; +#endif if (GET_CODE (body) == SET) {
Hi all, This patch fixes the build issue on x86_64 (and other targets that define NO_FUNCTION_CSE but not a particular value) on the GCC 5 branch. Tested on x86_64. Committing to the branch in the interest of fixing the build. Thanks, Kyrill 2016-01-12 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com> * postreload.c (reload_cse_simplify): Check for NO_FUNCTION_CSE definition instead of using it directly.