diff mbox

[tip/core/rcu,14/15] rcu: Use for_each_rcu_flavor() in TREE_RCU tracing

Message ID 1339794370-28119-14-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Paul E. McKenney June 15, 2012, 9:06 p.m. UTC
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit applies the new for_each_rcu_flavor() macro to the
kernel/rcutree_trace.c file.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree_trace.c |   95 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

Comments

Josh Triplett June 15, 2012, 11:59 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:06:09PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> This commit applies the new for_each_rcu_flavor() macro to the
> kernel/rcutree_trace.c file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/rcutree_trace.c |   95 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> index 057408b..c618665 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> @@ -48,22 +48,18 @@
>  
>  static void print_rcubarrier(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  {
> -	seq_printf(m, "%c bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n",
> -		   rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress ? 'B' : '.',
> +	seq_printf(m, "%s: %c bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n",
> +		   rsp->name, rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress ? 'B' : '.',
>  		   atomic_read(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count),
>  		   rsp->n_barrier_done);
>  }
>  
>  static int show_rcubarrier(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt: ");
> -	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched: ");
> -	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh: ");
> -	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> +
> +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> +		print_rcubarrier(m, rsp);

Now that you call this function exactly once, I'd suggest inlining it
for clarity; I don't think having it as a separate function makes sense
anymore.

> @@ -129,24 +125,16 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  		   rdp->n_cbs_invoked, rdp->n_cbs_orphaned, rdp->n_cbs_adopted);
>  }
>  
> -#define PRINT_RCU_DATA(name, func, m) \
> -	do { \
> -		int _p_r_d_i; \
> -		\
> -		for_each_possible_cpu(_p_r_d_i) \
> -			func(m, &per_cpu(name, _p_r_d_i)); \
> -	} while (0)
> -
>  static int show_rcudata(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
> -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
> -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
> -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> +	int cpu;
> +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> +
> +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> +		seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", rsp->name);
> +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> +		print_one_rcu_data(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
> +	}

As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_data.

Also, you need to indent the body of the for_each_possible_cpu loop.

> @@ -200,6 +188,9 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data_csv(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  
>  static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  {
> +	int cpu;
> +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> +
>  	seq_puts(m, "\"CPU\",\"Online?\",\"c\",\"g\",\"pq\",\"pgp\",\"pq\",");
>  	seq_puts(m, "\"dt\",\"dt nesting\",\"dt NMI nesting\",\"df\",");
>  	seq_puts(m, "\"of\",\"qll\",\"ql\",\"qs\"");
> @@ -207,14 +198,11 @@ static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  	seq_puts(m, "\"kt\",\"ktl\"");
>  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
>  	seq_puts(m, ",\"b\",\"ci\",\"co\",\"ca\"\n");
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_preempt:\"\n");
> -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_sched:\"\n");
> -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_bh:\"\n");
> -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> +		seq_printf(m, "\"%s:\"\n", rsp->name);
> +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> +			print_one_rcu_data_csv(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
> +	}

As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_data_csv.

> @@ -304,9 +292,9 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  	struct rcu_node *rnp;
>  
>  	gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
> -	seq_printf(m, "c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
> +	seq_printf(m, "%s: c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
>  		      "nfqs=%lu/nfqsng=%lu(%lu) fqlh=%lu oqlen=%ld/%ld\n",
> -		   rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
> +		   rsp->name, rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
>  		   (long)(rsp->jiffies_force_qs - jiffies),
>  		   (int)(jiffies & 0xffff),
>  		   rsp->n_force_qs, rsp->n_force_qs_ngp,
> @@ -329,14 +317,10 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  
>  static int show_rcuhier(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
> -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
> -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
> -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> +
> +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> +		print_one_rcu_state(m, rsp);

As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_state.

> @@ -377,11 +361,10 @@ static void show_one_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  
>  static int show_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> +
> +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> +		show_one_rcugp(m, rsp);

As above, I'd suggest inlining show_one_rcugp.

> @@ -430,14 +413,12 @@ static void print_rcu_pendings(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  
>  static int show_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
> -	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
> -	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
> -	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> +
> +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> +		seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", rsp->name);
> +		print_rcu_pendings(m, rsp);
> +	}

As above, I'd suggest inlining print_rcu_pendings.

- Josh Triplett
Paul E. McKenney June 16, 2012, 12:56 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 04:59:57PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:06:09PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > This commit applies the new for_each_rcu_flavor() macro to the
> > kernel/rcutree_trace.c file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/rcutree_trace.c |   95 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> >  1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> > index 057408b..c618665 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> > @@ -48,22 +48,18 @@
> >  
> >  static void print_rcubarrier(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> >  {
> > -	seq_printf(m, "%c bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n",
> > -		   rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress ? 'B' : '.',
> > +	seq_printf(m, "%s: %c bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n",
> > +		   rsp->name, rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress ? 'B' : '.',
> >  		   atomic_read(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count),
> >  		   rsp->n_barrier_done);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int show_rcubarrier(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >  {
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt: ");
> > -	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched: ");
> > -	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh: ");
> > -	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > +
> > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > +		print_rcubarrier(m, rsp);
> 
> Now that you call this function exactly once, I'd suggest inlining it
> for clarity; I don't think having it as a separate function makes sense
> anymore.

This one I am OK with.

> > @@ -129,24 +125,16 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
> >  		   rdp->n_cbs_invoked, rdp->n_cbs_orphaned, rdp->n_cbs_adopted);
> >  }
> >  
> > -#define PRINT_RCU_DATA(name, func, m) \
> > -	do { \
> > -		int _p_r_d_i; \
> > -		\
> > -		for_each_possible_cpu(_p_r_d_i) \
> > -			func(m, &per_cpu(name, _p_r_d_i)); \
> > -	} while (0)
> > -
> >  static int show_rcudata(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >  {
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
> > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
> > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
> > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> > +	int cpu;
> > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > +
> > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> > +		seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", rsp->name);
> > +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > +		print_one_rcu_data(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
> > +	}
> 
> As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_data.

Not this one, too bulky.

> Also, you need to indent the body of the for_each_possible_cpu loop.

Good point.

> > @@ -200,6 +188,9 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data_csv(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
> >  
> >  static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >  {
> > +	int cpu;
> > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > +
> >  	seq_puts(m, "\"CPU\",\"Online?\",\"c\",\"g\",\"pq\",\"pgp\",\"pq\",");
> >  	seq_puts(m, "\"dt\",\"dt nesting\",\"dt NMI nesting\",\"df\",");
> >  	seq_puts(m, "\"of\",\"qll\",\"ql\",\"qs\"");
> > @@ -207,14 +198,11 @@ static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >  	seq_puts(m, "\"kt\",\"ktl\"");
> >  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
> >  	seq_puts(m, ",\"b\",\"ci\",\"co\",\"ca\"\n");
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_preempt:\"\n");
> > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_sched:\"\n");
> > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> > -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_bh:\"\n");
> > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> > +		seq_printf(m, "\"%s:\"\n", rsp->name);
> > +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > +			print_one_rcu_data_csv(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
> > +	}
> 
> As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_data_csv.

Also too bulky.

> > @@ -304,9 +292,9 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> >  	struct rcu_node *rnp;
> >  
> >  	gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
> > -	seq_printf(m, "c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
> > +	seq_printf(m, "%s: c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
> >  		      "nfqs=%lu/nfqsng=%lu(%lu) fqlh=%lu oqlen=%ld/%ld\n",
> > -		   rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
> > +		   rsp->name, rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
> >  		   (long)(rsp->jiffies_force_qs - jiffies),
> >  		   (int)(jiffies & 0xffff),
> >  		   rsp->n_force_qs, rsp->n_force_qs_ngp,
> > @@ -329,14 +317,10 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> >  
> >  static int show_rcuhier(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >  {
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
> > -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
> > -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
> > -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > +
> > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > +		print_one_rcu_state(m, rsp);
> 
> As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_state.

Also too bulky.

> > @@ -377,11 +361,10 @@ static void show_one_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> >  
> >  static int show_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >  {
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> > -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > +
> > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > +		show_one_rcugp(m, rsp);
> 
> As above, I'd suggest inlining show_one_rcugp.

Also too bulky.

> > @@ -430,14 +413,12 @@ static void print_rcu_pendings(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> >  
> >  static int show_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >  {
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
> > -	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
> > -	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
> > -	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > +
> > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> > +		seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", rsp->name);
> > +		print_rcu_pendings(m, rsp);
> > +	}
> 
> As above, I'd suggest inlining print_rcu_pendings.

This one I will inline.

							Thanx, Paul
Josh Triplett June 16, 2012, 5:22 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:56:05PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 04:59:57PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:06:09PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > @@ -129,24 +125,16 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > >  		   rdp->n_cbs_invoked, rdp->n_cbs_orphaned, rdp->n_cbs_adopted);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -#define PRINT_RCU_DATA(name, func, m) \
> > > -	do { \
> > > -		int _p_r_d_i; \
> > > -		\
> > > -		for_each_possible_cpu(_p_r_d_i) \
> > > -			func(m, &per_cpu(name, _p_r_d_i)); \
> > > -	} while (0)
> > > -
> > >  static int show_rcudata(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > >  {
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
> > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> > > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
> > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
> > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> > > +	int cpu;
> > > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > > +
> > > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> > > +		seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", rsp->name);
> > > +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > > +		print_one_rcu_data(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
> > > +	}
> > 
> > As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_data.
> 
> Not this one, too bulky.

I looked at the implementation; it just consists of a pile of calls to
seq_printf.  What about that makes it too bulky to include in the body
of the loop?

> > > @@ -200,6 +188,9 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data_csv(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > >  
> > >  static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > >  {
> > > +	int cpu;
> > > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > > +
> > >  	seq_puts(m, "\"CPU\",\"Online?\",\"c\",\"g\",\"pq\",\"pgp\",\"pq\",");
> > >  	seq_puts(m, "\"dt\",\"dt nesting\",\"dt NMI nesting\",\"df\",");
> > >  	seq_puts(m, "\"of\",\"qll\",\"ql\",\"qs\"");
> > > @@ -207,14 +198,11 @@ static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > >  	seq_puts(m, "\"kt\",\"ktl\"");
> > >  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
> > >  	seq_puts(m, ",\"b\",\"ci\",\"co\",\"ca\"\n");
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > > -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_preempt:\"\n");
> > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> > > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > > -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_sched:\"\n");
> > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> > > -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_bh:\"\n");
> > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> > > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> > > +		seq_printf(m, "\"%s:\"\n", rsp->name);
> > > +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > > +			print_one_rcu_data_csv(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
> > > +	}
> > 
> > As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_data_csv.
> 
> Also too bulky.

Also just a few calls to seq_printf. :)

> > > @@ -304,9 +292,9 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > >  	struct rcu_node *rnp;
> > >  
> > >  	gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
> > > -	seq_printf(m, "c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
> > > +	seq_printf(m, "%s: c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
> > >  		      "nfqs=%lu/nfqsng=%lu(%lu) fqlh=%lu oqlen=%ld/%ld\n",
> > > -		   rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
> > > +		   rsp->name, rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
> > >  		   (long)(rsp->jiffies_force_qs - jiffies),
> > >  		   (int)(jiffies & 0xffff),
> > >  		   rsp->n_force_qs, rsp->n_force_qs_ngp,
> > > @@ -329,14 +317,10 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > >  
> > >  static int show_rcuhier(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > >  {
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
> > > -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> > > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
> > > -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
> > > -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> > > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > > +
> > > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > > +		print_one_rcu_state(m, rsp);
> > 
> > As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_state.
> 
> Also too bulky.

This one I'll grant, since it would introduce an additional level of
nested loop.

> > > @@ -377,11 +361,10 @@ static void show_one_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > >  
> > >  static int show_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > >  {
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > > -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> > > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > > -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> > > -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> > > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > > +
> > > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > > +		show_one_rcugp(m, rsp);
> > 
> > As above, I'd suggest inlining show_one_rcugp.
> 
> Also too bulky.

show_one_rcugp seems like an extremely simple function; what makes it
unsuitable for the body of this loop?

- Josh Triplett
Paul E. McKenney June 16, 2012, 6:42 a.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:22:14PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:56:05PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 04:59:57PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:06:09PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > @@ -129,24 +125,16 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > > >  		   rdp->n_cbs_invoked, rdp->n_cbs_orphaned, rdp->n_cbs_adopted);
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > -#define PRINT_RCU_DATA(name, func, m) \
> > > > -	do { \
> > > > -		int _p_r_d_i; \
> > > > -		\
> > > > -		for_each_possible_cpu(_p_r_d_i) \
> > > > -			func(m, &per_cpu(name, _p_r_d_i)); \
> > > > -	} while (0)
> > > > -
> > > >  static int show_rcudata(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > > >  {
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
> > > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> > > > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
> > > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> > > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
> > > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
> > > > +	int cpu;
> > > > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > > > +
> > > > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> > > > +		seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", rsp->name);
> > > > +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > > > +		print_one_rcu_data(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
> > > > +	}
> > > 
> > > As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_data.
> > 
> > Not this one, too bulky.
> 
> I looked at the implementation; it just consists of a pile of calls to
> seq_printf.  What about that makes it too bulky to include in the body
> of the loop?

Your referring to it as "a pile of calls" is strong evidence.  ;-)

> > > > @@ -200,6 +188,9 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data_csv(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > > >  
> > > >  static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > > >  {
> > > > +	int cpu;
> > > > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > > > +
> > > >  	seq_puts(m, "\"CPU\",\"Online?\",\"c\",\"g\",\"pq\",\"pgp\",\"pq\",");
> > > >  	seq_puts(m, "\"dt\",\"dt nesting\",\"dt NMI nesting\",\"df\",");
> > > >  	seq_puts(m, "\"of\",\"qll\",\"ql\",\"qs\"");
> > > > @@ -207,14 +198,11 @@ static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > > >  	seq_puts(m, "\"kt\",\"ktl\"");
> > > >  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
> > > >  	seq_puts(m, ",\"b\",\"ci\",\"co\",\"ca\"\n");
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > > > -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_preempt:\"\n");
> > > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> > > > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > > > -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_sched:\"\n");
> > > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> > > > -	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_bh:\"\n");
> > > > -	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
> > > > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> > > > +		seq_printf(m, "\"%s:\"\n", rsp->name);
> > > > +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > > > +			print_one_rcu_data_csv(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
> > > > +	}
> > > 
> > > As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_data_csv.
> > 
> > Also too bulky.
> 
> Also just a few calls to seq_printf. :)

For some definition or another of a few lines of code.  ;-)

> > > > @@ -304,9 +292,9 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > > >  	struct rcu_node *rnp;
> > > >  
> > > >  	gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
> > > > -	seq_printf(m, "c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
> > > > +	seq_printf(m, "%s: c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
> > > >  		      "nfqs=%lu/nfqsng=%lu(%lu) fqlh=%lu oqlen=%ld/%ld\n",
> > > > -		   rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
> > > > +		   rsp->name, rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
> > > >  		   (long)(rsp->jiffies_force_qs - jiffies),
> > > >  		   (int)(jiffies & 0xffff),
> > > >  		   rsp->n_force_qs, rsp->n_force_qs_ngp,
> > > > @@ -329,14 +317,10 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > > >  
> > > >  static int show_rcuhier(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > > >  {
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
> > > > -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> > > > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
> > > > -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> > > > -	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
> > > > -	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> > > > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > > > +
> > > > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > > > +		print_one_rcu_state(m, rsp);
> > > 
> > > As above, I'd suggest inlining print_one_rcu_state.
> > 
> > Also too bulky.
> 
> This one I'll grant, since it would introduce an additional level of
> nested loop.
> 
> > > > @@ -377,11 +361,10 @@ static void show_one_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > > >  
> > > >  static int show_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > > >  {
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > > > -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
> > > > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> > > > -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_sched_state);
> > > > -	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_bh_state);
> > > > +	struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > > > +
> > > > +	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> > > > +		show_one_rcugp(m, rsp);
> > > 
> > > As above, I'd suggest inlining show_one_rcugp.
> > 
> > Also too bulky.
> 
> show_one_rcugp seems like an extremely simple function; what makes it
> unsuitable for the body of this loop?

Ummm...  Nothing.  I actually did inline this one.  I was clearly
confused when documenting my actions!

							Thanx, Paul
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
index 057408b..c618665 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
@@ -48,22 +48,18 @@ 
 
 static void print_rcubarrier(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 {
-	seq_printf(m, "%c bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n",
-		   rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress ? 'B' : '.',
+	seq_printf(m, "%s: %c bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n",
+		   rsp->name, rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress ? 'B' : '.',
 		   atomic_read(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count),
 		   rsp->n_barrier_done);
 }
 
 static int show_rcubarrier(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt: ");
-	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched: ");
-	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_sched_state);
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh: ");
-	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_bh_state);
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
+		print_rcubarrier(m, rsp);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -129,24 +125,16 @@  static void print_one_rcu_data(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 		   rdp->n_cbs_invoked, rdp->n_cbs_orphaned, rdp->n_cbs_adopted);
 }
 
-#define PRINT_RCU_DATA(name, func, m) \
-	do { \
-		int _p_r_d_i; \
-		\
-		for_each_possible_cpu(_p_r_d_i) \
-			func(m, &per_cpu(name, _p_r_d_i)); \
-	} while (0)
-
 static int show_rcudata(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
+	int cpu;
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
+		seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", rsp->name);
+		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		print_one_rcu_data(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -200,6 +188,9 @@  static void print_one_rcu_data_csv(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 
 static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
+	int cpu;
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
 	seq_puts(m, "\"CPU\",\"Online?\",\"c\",\"g\",\"pq\",\"pgp\",\"pq\",");
 	seq_puts(m, "\"dt\",\"dt nesting\",\"dt NMI nesting\",\"df\",");
 	seq_puts(m, "\"of\",\"qll\",\"ql\",\"qs\"");
@@ -207,14 +198,11 @@  static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 	seq_puts(m, "\"kt\",\"ktl\"");
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
 	seq_puts(m, ",\"b\",\"ci\",\"co\",\"ca\"\n");
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_preempt:\"\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_sched:\"\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
-	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_bh:\"\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
+		seq_printf(m, "\"%s:\"\n", rsp->name);
+		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+			print_one_rcu_data_csv(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -304,9 +292,9 @@  static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 
 	gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
-	seq_printf(m, "c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
+	seq_printf(m, "%s: c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
 		      "nfqs=%lu/nfqsng=%lu(%lu) fqlh=%lu oqlen=%ld/%ld\n",
-		   rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
+		   rsp->name, rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
 		   (long)(rsp->jiffies_force_qs - jiffies),
 		   (int)(jiffies & 0xffff),
 		   rsp->n_force_qs, rsp->n_force_qs_ngp,
@@ -329,14 +317,10 @@  static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 
 static int show_rcuhier(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
-	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
-	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_sched_state);
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
-	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_bh_state);
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
+		print_one_rcu_state(m, rsp);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -377,11 +361,10 @@  static void show_one_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 
 static int show_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_sched_state);
-	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_bh_state);
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
+		show_one_rcugp(m, rsp);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -430,14 +413,12 @@  static void print_rcu_pendings(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 
 static int show_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
-	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
-	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_sched_state);
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
-	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_bh_state);
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
+		seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", rsp->name);
+		print_rcu_pendings(m, rsp);
+	}
 	return 0;
 }