From patchwork Fri Mar 24 14:09:00 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Juri Lelli X-Patchwork-Id: 95954 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.140.89.233 with SMTP id v96csp64386qgd; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:10:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.98.139.78 with SMTP id j75mr9469430pfe.122.1490364601962; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 204si2152997pfx.75.2017.03.24.07.10.01; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934874AbdCXOJy (ORCPT + 13 others); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:09:54 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:41300 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935823AbdCXOJr (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:09:47 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAD51596; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e106622-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e106622-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.211.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3367F3F575; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:09:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Juri Lelli To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it, bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, tkjos@android.com, joelaf@google.com, andresoportus@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, juri.lelli@arm.com, Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J . Wysocki" Subject: [RFD PATCH 5/5] sched/deadline: make bandwidth enforcement scale-invariant Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:09:00 +0000 Message-Id: <20170324140900.7334-6-juri.lelli@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.10.0 In-Reply-To: <20170324140900.7334-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> References: <20170324140900.7334-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Apply frequency and cpu scale-invariance correction factor to bandwidth enforcement (similar to what we already do to fair utilization tracking). Each delta_exec gets scaled considering current frequency and maximum cpu capacity; which means that the reservation runtime parameter (that need to be specified profiling the task execution at max frequency on biggest capacity core) gets thus scaled accordingly. Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Viresh Kumar Cc: Luca Abeni Cc: Claudio Scordino --- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++---- kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 -- kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.10.0 diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index 853de524c6c6..7141d6f51ee0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -940,7 +940,9 @@ static void update_curr_dl(struct rq *rq) { struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr; struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &curr->dl; - u64 delta_exec; + u64 delta_exec, scaled_delta_exec; + unsigned long scale_freq, scale_cpu; + int cpu = cpu_of(rq); if (!dl_task(curr) || !on_dl_rq(dl_se)) return; @@ -974,9 +976,26 @@ static void update_curr_dl(struct rq *rq) if (unlikely(dl_entity_is_special(dl_se))) return; - if (unlikely(dl_se->flags & SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM)) - delta_exec = grub_reclaim(delta_exec, rq, curr->dl.dl_bw); - dl_se->runtime -= delta_exec; + /* + * XXX When clock frequency is controlled by the scheduler (via + * schedutil governor) we implement GRUB-PA: the spare reclaimed + * bandwidth is used to clock down frequency. + * + * However, what below seems to assume scheduler to always be in + * control of clock frequency; when running at a fixed frequency + * (e.g., performance or userspace governor), shouldn't we instead + * use the grub_reclaim mechanism below? + * + * if (unlikely(dl_se->flags & SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM)) + * delta_exec = grub_reclaim(delta_exec, rq, curr->dl.dl_bw); + * dl_se->runtime -= delta_exec; + */ + scale_freq = arch_scale_freq_capacity(NULL, cpu); + scale_cpu = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu); + + scaled_delta_exec = cap_scale(delta_exec, scale_freq); + scaled_delta_exec = cap_scale(scaled_delta_exec, scale_cpu); + dl_se->runtime -= scaled_delta_exec; throttle: if (dl_runtime_exceeded(dl_se) || dl_se->dl_yielded) { diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 2805bd7c8994..37f12d0a3bc4 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -2818,8 +2818,6 @@ static u32 __compute_runnable_contrib(u64 n) return contrib + runnable_avg_yN_sum[n]; } -#define cap_scale(v, s) ((v)*(s) >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT) - /* * We can represent the historical contribution to runnable average as the * coefficients of a geometric series. To do this we sub-divide our runnable diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 7b5e81120813..81bd048ed181 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ static inline int task_has_dl_policy(struct task_struct *p) return dl_policy(p->policy); } +#define cap_scale(v, s) ((v)*(s) >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT) + static inline int dl_entity_is_special(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) { return dl_se->flags & SCHED_FLAG_SPECIAL;