diff --git a/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c b/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c index 1be0b521ac49..5add8e75759d 100644 --- a/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c +++ b/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ int cfpkt_setlen(struct cfpkt *pkt, u16 len) else skb_trim(skb, len); - return cfpkt_getlen(pkt); + return cfpkt_getlen(pkt); } /* Need to expand SKB */
commit 8e0cc8c326d99e41468c96fea9785ab78883a281 upstream. gcc points out code that is not indented the way it is interpreted: net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c: In function 'cfpkt_setlen': net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c:289:4: error: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Werror=misleading-indentation] return cfpkt_getlen(pkt); ^~~~~~ net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c:286:3: note: ...this 'else' clause, but it is not else ^~~~ It is clear from the context that not returning here would be a bug, as we'd end up passing a negative length into a function that takes a u16 length, so it is not missing curly braces here, and I'm assuming that the indentation is the only part that's wrong about it. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.9.0