mbox series

[v4,00/18] ASoC: mediatek: Add support for MT8186 SoC

Message ID 20220428093355.16172-1-jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com
Headers show
Series ASoC: mediatek: Add support for MT8186 SoC | expand

Message

Jiaxin Yu (俞家鑫) April 28, 2022, 9:33 a.m. UTC
This series of patches adds support for Mediatek AFE of MT8186 Soc.
Patches are based on broonie tree "for-next" branch.

Changes since v3:
  - [v4 09/18]
    - remove DEBUG_COEFF debugging code
  - [v4 10/18]
    - simplify the logic of the code
  - [v4 13/18]
    - split out the MT6366 bits into mt8186-mt6366-commom.c
    - fix build error of "error: 'struct dev_pm_info' has no member named 'runtime_error'"
    - fix bug of adda dai driver
    - add route for pcm interface channel 2.
  - [v4 15/18]
  - [v4 17/18]
    - commonize the configuration of the codecs
    - move MT6366 common bits into mt8186-mt6366-common.c

Changes since v2:
  - add a new compatible string "mediatek,mt6366-sound"
  - modify the log level for simplicity
  - use dev_err_probe(...) instead of dev_err(...) in dev probe()
  - optimized the logic of some code
  - use BIT() and GENMASK() macros to descript the registers

  Thanks for AngeloGioacchino's careful reviews.

Changes since v1:
  [v2 01/17]
    - add a new ID to the existing mt6358 codec driver
  [v2 03/17]
    - modify log level in DAPM events
    - use standard numeric control with name ending in Switch
    - return 1 when the value changed in mixer control's .get callback
  [v2 05/17]
    - ending in Switch to the standard on/off controls
    - change to "HW Gain 1 Volume" and "HW Gain 2 Volume"
  [v2 09/17]
    - return an error in the default case rather than just picking one of
      the behaviours when do .set_fmt
    - use the new defines that are _PROVIDER_MASK, _DAIFMT_CBP_CFP and
      _DAIFMT_CBC_CFC
  [v2 10/17]
  [v2 11/17]
    - the clock and gpio are aplit out into separate  patches

  The source file's GPL comment use c++ style, and the header fils's GPL
  comment use c style. We have added "Switch" after the names of all the
  controls that just are simple on/off.

Jiaxin Yu (18):
  ASoC: mediatek: mt6366: support for mt6366 codec
  dt-bindings: mediatek: mt6358: add new compatible for using mt6366
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support audsys clock control
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support adda in platform driver
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support hostless in platform driver
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support hw gain in platform driver
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support i2s in platform driver
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support pcm in platform driver
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support src in platform driver
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support tdm in platform driver
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support audio clock control in platform driver
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support gpio control in platform driver
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: add platform driver
  dt-bindings: mediatek: mt8186: add audio afe document
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: add machine driver with mt6366, da7219 and
    max98357
  dt-bindings: mediatek: mt8186: add mt8186-mt6366-da7219-max98357
    document
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: add machine driver with mt6366, rt1019 and
    rt5682s
  dt-bindings: mediatek: mt8186: add mt8186-mt6366-rt1019-rt5682s
    document

 .../devicetree/bindings/sound/mt6358.txt      |    4 +-
 .../bindings/sound/mt8186-afe-pcm.yaml        |  175 +
 .../sound/mt8186-mt6366-da7219-max98357.yaml  |   71 +
 .../sound/mt8186-mt6366-rt1019-rt5682s.yaml   |   71 +
 sound/soc/codecs/mt6358.c                     |    1 +
 sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig                    |   44 +
 sound/soc/mediatek/Makefile                   |    1 +
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/Makefile            |   22 +
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-clk.c    |  651 ++++
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-clk.h    |  106 +
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-common.h |  235 ++
 .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c  |  261 ++
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-gpio.c   |  244 ++
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-gpio.h   |   19 +
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-pcm.c    | 3005 +++++++++++++++++
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-audsys-clk.c |  150 +
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-audsys-clk.h |   15 +
 .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-audsys-clkid.h |   45 +
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c   |  873 +++++
 .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-hostless.c |  298 ++
 .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-hw-gain.c  |  236 ++
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-i2s.c    | 1355 ++++++++
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-pcm.c    |  423 +++
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-src.c    |  695 ++++
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-tdm.c    |  695 ++++
 .../mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-interconnection.h  |   69 +
 .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-misc-control.c |  294 ++
 .../mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-mt6366-common.c    |   59 +
 .../mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-mt6366-common.h    |   17 +
 .../mt8186/mt8186-mt6366-da7219-max98357.c    | 1003 ++++++
 .../mt8186/mt8186-mt6366-rt1019-rt5682s.c     |  979 ++++++
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-reg.h        | 2913 ++++++++++++++++
 32 files changed, 15028 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/mt8186-afe-pcm.yaml
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/mt8186-mt6366-da7219-max98357.yaml
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/mt8186-mt6366-rt1019-rt5682s.yaml
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/Makefile
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-clk.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-clk.h
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-common.h
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-gpio.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-gpio.h
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-pcm.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-audsys-clk.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-audsys-clk.h
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-audsys-clkid.h
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-hostless.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-hw-gain.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-i2s.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-pcm.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-src.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-tdm.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-interconnection.h
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-misc-control.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-mt6366-common.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-mt6366-common.h
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-mt6366-da7219-max98357.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-mt6366-rt1019-rt5682s.c
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-reg.h

Comments

Jiaxin Yu (俞家鑫) April 29, 2022, 9:15 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 10:47 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jiaxin,
> 
> Gmail tends to mark your patches as spam.
> Can you please make sure to use "PATCH" in the subject line, e.g.
> "[PATCH v4 00/18] ASoC: mediatek: Add support for MT8186 SoC"?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- 
> geert@linux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a
> hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something
> like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds

Hi Geert,

Sorry for this mistake, I usually use "git format-patch --subject-
prefix "v4" --cover-letter -x" to generate a series of patches.
So it automatically removes "PATCH". I will correct the cmd to "git
format-patch --subject-prefix "PATCH v4" --cover-letter -x".

Thanks,
Jiaxin.Yu
Jiaxin Yu (俞家鑫) April 29, 2022, 10:07 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 13:02 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 05:33:50PM +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote:
> > Add mt8186 platform and affiliated driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig                    |   44 +
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/Makefile                   |    1 +
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/Makefile            |   22 +
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-common.h |  235 ++
> >  .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c  |  261 ++
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-pcm.c    | 3005
> > +++++++++++++++++
> >  .../mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-interconnection.h  |   69 +
> >  .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-misc-control.c |  294 ++
> >  .../mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-mt6366-common.c    |   59 +
> >  .../mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-mt6366-common.h    |   17 +
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-reg.h        | 2913
> > ++++++++++++++++
> >  11 files changed, 6920 insertions(+)
> 
> This looks mostly good though it is enormous so I might've missed
> some
> things.  The patch series is already very large but it might still be
> worth splitting this up a bit more, perhaps split the code and data
> tables/register definitions into separate patches?
> 
Yes, agree with you.

I will spit them into three patches:

PATCH 1: 
  - mt8186-reg.h
  - mt8186-interconnection.h
  - mt8186-misc-control.c

PATCH 2:
  - mt8186-mt6366-common.c
  - mt8186-mt6366-common.h

PATCH 3:
  - sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig 
  - sound/soc/mediatek/Makefile
  - sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/Makefile
  - sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-common.h
  - .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c
  - sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-pcm.c

> A few relatively minor issues with the controls.
> 
> > +/* this order must match reg bit amp_div_ch1/2 */
> > +static const char * const mt8186_sgen_amp_str[] = {
> > +	"1/128", "1/64", "1/32", "1/16", "1/8", "1/4", "1/2", "1" };
> > +static const char * const mt8186_sgen_mute_str[] = {
> > +	"Off", "On"
> > +};
> 
> On/off controls should be normal Switch controls not enums so
> userspace
> can display things sensibly.
> 
> > +static int mt8186_sgen_set(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > +			   struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> > +{
> > +	struct snd_soc_component *cmpnt =
> > snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
> > +	struct mtk_base_afe *afe =
> > snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(cmpnt);
> > +	struct mt8186_afe_private *afe_priv = afe->platform_priv;
> > +	struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol-
> > >private_value;
> > +	int mode;
> > +	int mode_idx;
> > +
> > +	if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->items)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> ...
> 
> > +				   0x3f << INNER_LOOP_BACK_MODE_SFT);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	afe_priv->sgen_mode = mode;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> This should return 1 if the value is different from the previous
> value
> so event generation works, please run mixer-test against a system
> using
> the driver to help spot issues like this.  The same issue applies to
> at
> least some of the other custom controls.
> 
Got it.

> > +static int mt8186_sgen_mute_set(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > +				struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> > +{
> > +	struct snd_soc_component *cmpnt =
> > snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
> > +	struct mtk_base_afe *afe =
> > snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(cmpnt);
> > +	struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol-
> > >private_value;
> > +	int mute;
> > +
> > +	if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->items)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	mute = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
> > +
> > +	dev_dbg(afe->dev, "%s(), kcontrol name %s, mute %d\n",
> > +		__func__, kcontrol->id.name, mute);
> > +
> > +	if (strcmp(kcontrol->id.name, SGEN_MUTE_CH1_KCONTROL_NAME) ==
> > 0) {
> > +		regmap_update_bits(afe->regmap, AFE_SINEGEN_CON0,
> > +				   MUTE_SW_CH1_MASK_SFT,
> > +				   mute << MUTE_SW_CH1_SFT);
> > +	} else {
> > +		regmap_update_bits(afe->regmap, AFE_SINEGEN_CON0,
> > +				   MUTE_SW_CH2_MASK_SFT,
> > +				   mute << MUTE_SW_CH2_SFT);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> I can't tell why some of these are done with custom code rather than
> using a normal SOC_SINGLE()?

Yes, it's better to use SOC_SINGLE. I will fix them in next version.

Thanks,
Jiaxin.yu