| Message ID | 20220111190528.445248-3-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | feb00b736af64875560f371fe7f58b0b7f239046 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ASoC: topology: Fixes | expand |
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c index e0f72ddd72c1..9d24184f85f9 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c @@ -512,7 +512,8 @@ static int soc_tplg_kcontrol_bind_io(struct snd_soc_tplg_ctl_hdr *hdr, if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->ops.info) == SND_SOC_TPLG_CTL_BYTES && k->iface & SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER - && k->access & SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_TLV_READWRITE + && (k->access & SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_TLV_READ + || k->access & SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_TLV_WRITE) && k->access & SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_TLV_CALLBACK) { struct soc_bytes_ext *sbe; struct snd_soc_tplg_bytes_control *be;
There is no reason to force readwrite access on TLV controls. It can be either read, write or both. This is further evidenced in code where it performs following checks: if ((k->access & SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_TLV_READ) && !sbe->get) return -EINVAL; if ((k->access & SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_TLV_WRITE) && !sbe->put) return -EINVAL; Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> --- sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)