From patchwork Tue Mar 9 01:08:08 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kuninori Morimoto X-Patchwork-Id: 396812 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF137C433E0 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B25F651BB for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:11:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1B25F651BB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=renesas.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97773184C; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 02:10:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 97773184C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1615252264; bh=MKvObV1rJh3n7VXsivbdKC7tMBkzUyB6x7Rof+wMXYg=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=toAmpe/gGTa4MdDpcPUg+PAOOSw6fRkTCUgBzTkWzpLQHYuYrUgHh2/4kzqUP2jTb VHcrJGxP5Zqg73SYHXMEUeEwm6EwdDGMDj/4Gm3uDyENf11AC8v4i7kX+/nVmeg/oV mhMF302ty/RqCijZr9VMbZuJKFXDEMFxo3+J2Vk8= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A3FF804B2; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 02:08:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 084E0F804B2; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 02:08:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from relmlie6.idc.renesas.com (relmlor2.renesas.com [210.160.252.172]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF041F802E7 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 02:08:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz BF041F802E7 Date: 09 Mar 2021 10:08:08 +0900 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,233,1610377200"; d="scan'208";a="74255524" Received: from unknown (HELO relmlir5.idc.renesas.com) ([10.200.68.151]) by relmlie6.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2021 10:08:08 +0900 Received: from mercury.renesas.com (unknown [10.166.252.133]) by relmlir5.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFB8400C4D8; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:08:08 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <87czw9uoav.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> From: Kuninori Morimoto Subject: [PATCH v3 6/8] ASoC: soc-pcm: fixup dpcm_be_dai_startup() user count User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 To: Mark Brown In-Reply-To: <87lfaxuoc3.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> References: <87lfaxuoc3.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Cc: Linux-ALSA X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" From: Kuninori Morimoto At dpcm_be_dai_startup_unwind(), it indicates error message at (1) if this function was called with no users. But, it doesn't use "continue" here. Thus, users will be a negative number at (2) void dpcm_be_dai_startup_unwind(...) { ... for_each_dpcm_be(...) { ... (1) if (be->dpcm[stream].users == 0) dev_err(...); (2) if (--be->dpcm[stream].users != 0) continue; At dpcm_be_dai_startup(), it indicates error message if user reached to MAX USERS at (A). But, it doesn't use "continue" here. Thus, it will be over MAX USERS at (B). int dpcm_be_dai_startup(...) { ... for_each_dpcm_be(...) { ... (A) if (be->dpcm[stream].users == DPCM_MAX_BE_USERS) dev_err(...); (B) if (be->dpcm[stream].users++ != 0) continue; These are just bug. This patch fixup these. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 910a6afe9f48..626d6e0a3a15 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -1432,10 +1432,12 @@ static void dpcm_be_dai_startup_unwind(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, struct snd_pcm_substream *be_substream = snd_soc_dpcm_get_substream(be, stream); - if (be->dpcm[stream].users == 0) + if (be->dpcm[stream].users == 0) { dev_err(be->dev, "ASoC: no users %s at close - state %d\n", stream ? "capture" : "playback", be->dpcm[stream].state); + continue; + } if (--be->dpcm[stream].users != 0) continue; @@ -1472,10 +1474,12 @@ int dpcm_be_dai_startup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream) continue; /* first time the dpcm is open ? */ - if (be->dpcm[stream].users == DPCM_MAX_BE_USERS) + if (be->dpcm[stream].users == DPCM_MAX_BE_USERS) { dev_err(be->dev, "ASoC: too many users %s at open %d\n", stream ? "capture" : "playback", be->dpcm[stream].state); + continue; + } if (be->dpcm[stream].users++ != 0) continue; @@ -1517,10 +1521,12 @@ int dpcm_be_dai_startup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream) if (!snd_soc_dpcm_be_can_update(fe, be, stream)) continue; - if (be->dpcm[stream].users == 0) + if (be->dpcm[stream].users == 0) { dev_err(be->dev, "ASoC: no users %s at close %d\n", stream ? "capture" : "playback", be->dpcm[stream].state); + continue; + } if (--be->dpcm[stream].users != 0) continue;