From patchwork Mon Feb 22 09:37:49 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shannon Zhao X-Patchwork-Id: 62533 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.112.43.199 with SMTP id y7csp1124157lbl; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:45:12 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.98.74.144 with SMTP id c16mr36482006pfj.129.1456134312259; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:45:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2001:1868:205::9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h6si38737619pfd.5.2016.02.22.01.45.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:45:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:1868:205::9; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aXn2C-0006Pl-Kw; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:44:04 +0000 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aXmym-0002M0-QY for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:40:37 +0000 Received: from 172.24.1.51 (EHLO szxeml434-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.1.51]) by szxrg03-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.4.3-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BWL63334; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:39:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from HGHY1Z002260041.china.huawei.com (10.177.16.142) by szxeml434-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.225) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:38:53 +0800 From: Shannon Zhao To: , , Subject: [PATCH v12 13/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMSWINC register Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:37:49 +0800 Message-ID: <1456133877-9584-14-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.0.msysgit.0 In-Reply-To: <1456133877-9584-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> References: <1456133877-9584-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.177.16.142] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.56CAD736.0009, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-05-26 15:14:31, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 2ddf3087837950d5a8875ca2cb1c7352 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20160222_014033_646462_03AAFEC9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.69 ) X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-4.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [119.145.14.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [119.145.14.66 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: wei@redhat.com, hangaohuai@huawei.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, shannon.zhao@linaro.org, zhaoshenglong@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, cov@codeaurora.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org From: Shannon Zhao Add access handler which emulates writing and reading PMSWINC register and add support for creating software increment event. Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones --- arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h | 2 ++ arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 2 ++ virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.0.4 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h index 867140d..c3f5937 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ #define ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK 0xc80003ff /* Mask for writable bits */ #define ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT 0x3ff /* Mask for EVENT bits */ +#define ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT_SW_INCR 0 /* Software increment event */ + /* * Event filters for PMUv3 */ diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index 7769b19..f31023b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -672,6 +672,23 @@ static bool access_pmovs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p, return true; } +static bool access_pmswinc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p, + const struct sys_reg_desc *r) +{ + u64 mask; + + if (!kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu)) + return trap_raz_wi(vcpu, p, r); + + if (p->is_write) { + mask = kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu); + kvm_pmu_software_increment(vcpu, p->regval & mask); + return true; + } + + return false; +} + /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in one go */ #define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(n) \ /* DBGBVRn_EL1 */ \ @@ -882,7 +899,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = { access_pmovs, NULL, PMOVSSET_EL0 }, /* PMSWINC_EL0 */ { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b100), - trap_raz_wi }, + access_pmswinc, reset_unknown, PMSWINC_EL0 }, /* PMSELR_EL0 */ { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b101), access_pmselr, reset_unknown, PMSELR_EL0 }, @@ -1221,6 +1238,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = { { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), access_pmcnten }, { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), access_pmcnten }, { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), access_pmovs }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 4), access_pmswinc }, { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), access_pmselr }, { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 6), access_pmceid }, { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 7), access_pmceid }, diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h index 60061da..348c4c9 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); +void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data, u64 select_idx); #else @@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) static inline void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} +static inline void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data, u64 select_idx) {} #endif diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c index 0232861..9fc775e 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c @@ -180,6 +180,36 @@ void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu); } +/** + * kvm_pmu_software_increment - do software increment + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer + * @val: the value guest writes to PMSWINC register + */ +void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) +{ + int i; + u64 type, enable, reg; + + if (val == 0) + return; + + enable = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCNTENSET_EL0); + for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX; i++) { + if (!(val & BIT(i))) + continue; + type = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + i) + & ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT; + if ((type == ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT_SW_INCR) + && (enable & BIT(i))) { + reg = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + i) + 1; + reg = lower_32_bits(reg); + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + i) = reg; + if (!reg) + kvm_pmu_overflow_set(vcpu, BIT(i)); + } + } +} + static bool kvm_pmu_counter_is_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx) { return (vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E) && @@ -208,6 +238,10 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data, kvm_pmu_stop_counter(vcpu, pmc); eventsel = data & ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT; + /* Software increment event does't need to be backed by a perf event */ + if (eventsel == ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT_SW_INCR) + return; + memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(struct perf_event_attr)); attr.type = PERF_TYPE_RAW; attr.size = sizeof(attr);